A social–product–process framework for construction

References

• Abduh, M., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2003). Utility assessment of electronic networking technologies for design-build projects. Automation in Construction, 12(2), 167–183. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(02)00042-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriaanse, A. M., Voordijk, H., & Dewulf, G. P. M. R. (2004). Alignment between ICT and communication in construction projects. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 4(4), 346–357.
   Google Scholar
• Alarcón, D. M., Alarcón, I. M., & Alarcón, L. F. (2013, August). Social network analysis: A diagnostic tool for information flow in the AEC industry. In C. T. Formoso, & P. Tzortzopoulos (Eds.), 21th Annual conference of the international group for lean construction, Fortaleza, Brazil (pp. 947–956).
   Google Scholar
• Allen, B. R., & Boynton, A. C. (1991). Information architecture: In search of efficient flexibility. MIS Quarterly, 15(4), 435–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arayici, Y., Egbu, C. O., & Coates, P. (2012). Building information modelling (BIM) implementation and remote construction projects: Issues, challenges, and critiques. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 17, 75–92.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. London, UK: Claredon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avineri, S. (1968). The social and political thought of Karl Marx (Vol. 619). Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139171410
   Google Scholar
• Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241–252. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000127
   Google Scholar
• Babič, N. Č., Podbreznik, P., & Rebolj, D. (2010). Integrating resource production and construction using BIM. Automation in Construction, 19(5), 539–543. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, F. (1626). New Atlantis. In R.-M. Sargent (Ed.), Francis Bacon: Selected philosophical works ( 1999, pp. 241–268). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, G., & Sommerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers, 23(1), 4–17. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetz, J., Borrmann, A., & Weise, M. (2018). Process-based definition of model content. In A. Borrmann, M. König, C. Koch, & J. Beetz (Eds.), Building information modeling: Technology foundations and industry practice (pp. 127–138). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3
   Google Scholar
• Björk, B.-C. (2002). A formalised model of the information and materials handling activities in the construction process. Construction Innovation, 2(3), 133–149.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L. (2003). Designing and learning: A disjunction in contexts. Design Studies, 24(3), 295–311.
   Google Scholar
• buildingSMART (2018). IfcProcess [technical document]. Retrieved from https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC4_1/FINAL/HTML/schema/ifckernel/lexical/ifcprocess.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cerić, A. (2014). Strategies for minimizing information asymmetries in construction projects: Project managers’ perceptions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 15(3), 424–440. doi: 10.3846/16111699.2012.720601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerovšek, T. (2011). A review and outlook for a “building information model” (BIM): A multi-standpoint framework for technological development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(2), 224–244. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W. L., Li, H., Love, P. E. D., & Irani, Z. (2001). Network communication in the construction industry. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(2), 61–70. doi: 10.1108/13563280110390314
   Google Scholar
• Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., & Galotti, V. (2008). Social network model of construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(10), 804–812. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:10(804)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., & O’Brien, J. (2009). Project organizations as social networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(4), 452–458. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. A., & Tavares, L. V. (2014). Social E-business as support for construction e-procurement: E-procurement network dynamics. Automation in Construction, 43, 180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossick, C., Anderson, A., Azari, R., Iorio, J., Neff, G., & Taylor, J. (2014). Messy talk in virtual teams: Achieving knowledge synthesis through shared visualizations. ASCE Journal of Management in Engineering, 31, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000301
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger's being and time, division I. USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ellul, J., & Merton, R. K. (1964). The technological society. New York: Vintage books.
   Google Scholar
• Emmitt, S., & Gorse, C. A. (2003). Construction communication: 1 edition. Oxford/Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1953). An analysis of compliant behavior. In M. Sherif, & M. O. Wilson (Eds.), Group relations at the crossroads (pp. 232–256). New York: Harper & Bros.
   Google Scholar
• Framework. (n.d./a). In Oxford Learner's Dictionary of Academic English. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/academic/framework
   Google Scholar
• Framework. (n.d./b). In Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/framework
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, G. C., & Maher, M. L. (2002). Coding and modelling communication in architectural collaborative design. Automation in Construction, 11(2), 199–211. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00098-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gade, P. N., Gade, A. N., Otrel-Cass, K., & Svidt, K. (2019). A holistic analysis of a BIM-mediated building design process using activity theory. Construction Management and Economics, 37(6), 336–350. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2018.1533644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardan, Y. (2012). Architectural design and CAD: A selection of papers from MICAD. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, Nichols Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. I). Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, M., & Ekholm, A. (2012). A BIM-Info delivery protocol. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 12(4), 39–52. doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v12i4.3031
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2015). ISO 9000:2015(en) Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary [Technical description]. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9000:ed-4:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. B., & Brennan, M. (1996). Planning or organizing: The implications of theories of activity for management of operations. OMEGA, 24(4), 367–384. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(96)00016-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, S., & Fells, R. (2017). Reflection-in-action as a collective process: Findings from a study in teaching students of negotiation. Reflective Practice, 18(1), 67–80. doi: 10.1080/14623943.2016.1251410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D., Mayes, T., & McAleese, R. (1993). A manifesto for a constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education. In T. M. Duffy et al. (Ed.), Designing environments for constructive learning (pp. 231–247). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kalay, Y. E. (1985). Redefining the role of computers in architecture: From drafting/modelling tools to knowledge based assistants. Computer-Aided Design, 17(7), 319–328. doi: 10.1016/0010-4485(85)90165-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. M. (ed.). (2009). Readings in the philosophy of technology, second edition. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• König, M. (2018). Process Modeling. In A. Borrmann, M. König, C. Koch, & J. Beetz (Eds.), Building information modeling: Technology foundations and industry practice (pp. 63–78). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3
   Google Scholar
• Koskela, L., & Howell, G. (2002). The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. PMI research conference 2002: Frontiers of project management research and applications (pp. 293-301). Seattle, WA: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget: A manifesto. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Linderoth, H. C. J. (2010). Understanding adoption and use of BIM as the creation of actor networks. Automation in Construction, 19(1), 66–72. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P., & Deasley, P. (1998). Ethnographic description of design networks. Automation in Construction, 7(2), 101–110. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00051-4
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren, A. (2005). Socio-technical management of collaborative mobile computing in construction. In R. Scherer, P. Katranuschkov, & S.-E. Schapke (Eds.), W78 2005, Proceedings of the CIB W78 22nd conference on information technology in construction (pp. 137–146). Dresden, DE: Technische Universität Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• Medina-Mora, R., Wong, H. K. T., & Flores, P. (1993). Action workflow as the enterprise integration technology. IEEE Computer Society Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 16(2), 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J., & McCullough, M. (1995). Digital design media. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Molin, K. (2003, April). Divided loyalties in project management. Third European Academy of management conference, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2014). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Negroponte, N. (1975). Soft architecture machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• NIST - National Institute of Standards and Technology, Computer Systems Laboratory. (1993). Integration definition for function Modeling (idef0), Draft Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183 [Technical definition]. Retrieved from http://www.idef.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/idef0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, 1, 17. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1008839
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1992a). Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 362–369). doi: 10.1145/143457.143549
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (1992b). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulini, M., Murty, P., & Maher, M. L. (2012). Understanding collective design communication in open innovation communities. International Journal of CoCreation in Design and Arts, 9(2), 90–112. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2012.716850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, E., & Songer, A. (1999). Web-centric systems: A new paradigm for collaborative engineering. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15(1), 39–45. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:1(39)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Institute of British Architects – RIBA. (2013). RIBA plan of work 2013 [work document]. Retrieved from http://www.ribaplanofwork.com/
   Google Scholar
• Royal Institute of British Architects – RIBA. (2016). RIBA small project plan of work [work document]. Retrieved from https://www.architecture.com/-/media/gathercontent/riba-plan-of-work/additional-documents/ribasmallprojectplanofworkonlinepdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schäl, T. (1995). Supporting cooperative work with workflow management technology. In C. Zucchermaglio, S. Bagnara, & S. U. Stucky (Eds.), Organizational learning and technological change. NATO ASI series (series F: computer and systems sciences) (pp. 141). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. USA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts – An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, T., & Mead, S. (2001). Project-specific web sites: Friend or foe? Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(5), 406–413. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:5(406)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk, Ž. (1998). On theoretical backgrounds of CAD. In I. Smith (Ed.), Artificial intelligence in structural engineering: Information technology for design, collaboration, maintenance, and monitoring (pp. 490–496). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0030480
   Google Scholar
• Turk, Ž. (2000). Communication workflow approach to CIC. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on computing in civil and building engineering (ICCCBE-VIII) (pp. 1094–1101). Stanford, CA: American Society of Civil Engineers. doi: 10.1061/40513(279)142
   Google Scholar
• Ustinovichius, L., Popov, V., Cepurnaite, J., Vilutienė, T., Samofalov, M., & Miedziałowski, C. (2018). BIM-based process management model for building design and refurbishment. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 18(4), 1136–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uusitalo, P., Seppänen, O., Peltokorpi, A., & Olivieri, H. (2019). A lean design management process based on planning the level of detail in BIM-based design. In I. Mutis, & T. Hartmann (Eds.), Advances in informatics and computing in civil and construction engineering (pp. 147–152). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• von Mises, L. (1949). Human action: A treatise on economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. K., & Hartmann, T. (2017). How digitizing building information transforms the built environment (editorial). Building Research & Information, 45(6), 591–595. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1324726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikforss, Ö., & Löfgren, A. (2007). Rethinking communication in construction. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 12, 337-346. Retrieved from http://www.itcon.org/2007/23
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. (2005). Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(4), 497–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, X., Shen, Q., Fan, H., Li, H., & Fan, S. (2012). IT supported collaborative work in A/E/C projects: A ten-year review. Automation in Construction, 21(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.05.016
   Google Scholar
• Zamanian, M. K., & Pittman, J. H. (1999). A software industry perspective on AEC information models for distributed collaboration. Automation in Construction, 8(3), 237–248, doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00074-0
   Google Scholar