Detection of defects in building walls using modified OptD method for down-sampling of point clouds

References

• Alkadri, M. F., Turrin, M., & Sariyildiz, S. (2019). A computational workflow to analyse material properties and solar radiation of existing contexts from attribute information of point cloud data. Building and Environment, 155, 268–282. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armesto-González, J., Riveiro-Rodríguez, B., González-Aguilera, D., & Rivas-Brea, M. T. (2010). Terrestrial laser scanning intensity data applied to damage detection for historical buildings. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37(12), 3037–3047. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błaszczak-Bąk, W., Koppanyi, Z., & Toth, C. (2018). Reduction method for mobile laser scanning data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(7), 1–13. doi: 10.3390/ijgi7070285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błaszczak-Bąk, W., Sobieraj-Żłobińska, A., & Kowalik, M. (2017). The OptD-multi method in LiDAR processing. Measurement Science and Technology, 28(7), 7500–7509. doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/aa7444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Tian, D., Feng, C., Vetro, A., & Kovačević, J. (2018). Fast resampling of three-dimensional point clouds via graphs. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 66(3), 666–681. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2017.2771730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. K., & Lin, Y. F. (2014). Multi-objective decision-making supporting system of maintenance strategies for deteriorating reinforced concrete buildings. Automation in Construction, 39, 15–31. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Jover, A., Lluis i Ginovart, J., Coll-Pla, S., & López Piquer, M. (2019). Using the terrestrial laser scanner and simple methodologies for geometrically assessing complex masonry vaults. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 36, 247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, D. H., & Peucker, T. K. (1973). Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 10(2), 112–122. doi: 10.3138/FM57-6770-U75U-7727
   Google Scholar
• Erdélyi, J., Kopacik, A., & Kyrinovič, P. (2018). Construction control and documentation of facade elements using terrestrial laser scanning. Applied Geomatics, 10(2), 113–121. doi: 10.1007/s12518-018-0208-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerke, M., & Xiao, J. (2014). Fusion of airborne laserscanning point clouds and images for supervised and unsupervised scene classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87, 78–92. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Jorge, H., Gonzalez-Aguilera, D., Rodriguez-Gonzalvez, P., & Arias, P. (2012). Monitoring biological crusts in civil engineering structures using intensity data from terrestrial laser scanners. Construction and Building Materials, 31, 119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruen, A., Behnisch, M., & Kohler, N. (2009). Perspectives in the reality-based generation, nD modelling, and operation of buildings and building stocks. Building Research and Information, 37(5–6), 503–519. doi: 10.1080/09613210903189509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, L. K., Le Borgne, S., & Videla, H. A. (2009). Modern methods for materials characterization and surface analysis to study the effects of biodeterioration and weathering on buildings of cultural heritage. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 3, 74–91. doi: 10.1080/15583050802149995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honti, R., Erdélyi, J., & Kopacik, A. (2018). Plane segmentation from point clouds. Pollack Periodica, 13(2), 159–171. doi: 10.1556/606.2018.13.2.16
   Google Scholar
• Höfle, B., & Pfeifer, N. (2007). Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62(6), 415–433. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, H., Fernandez-Steeger, T. M., Dong, M., & Azzam, R. (2012). Numerical modeling of LiDAR-based geological model for landslide analysis. Automation in Construction, 24, 184–193. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaasalainen, S., Jaakkola, A., Kaasalainen, M., Krooks, A., & Kukko, A. (2011). Analysis of incidence angle and distance effects on terrestrial laser scanner intensity: Search for correction methods. Remote Sensing, 3(10), 2207–2221. doi: 10.3390/rs3102207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaasalainen, S., Niittymäki, H., Krooks, A., Koch, K., Kaartinen, H., Vain, A., & Hyyppä, H. (2010). Effect of target moisture on laser scanner intensity. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(4), 2128–2136. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2036841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashani, A. G., Olsen, M. J., Parrish, C. E., & Wilson, N. (2015). A review of LIDAR radiometric processing: From ad hoc intensity correction to rigorous radiometric calibration. Sensors, 15(11), 1–31. doi: 10.3390/s151128099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukko, A., Anttila, K., Manninen, T., Kaasalainen, S., & Kaartinen, H. (2013). Snow surface roughness from mobile laser scanning data. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 96, 23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, X., Yuan, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, M. (2019). Full-waveform LiDAR point clouds classification based on wavelet support vector machine and ensemble learning. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19(14), 1–14. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2912683
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-J., Benziger, R. R., & Habib, A. (2016). Planar-based adaptive down-sampling of point clouds. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 82(12), 955–966. doi: 10.14358/PERS.82.12.955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglo, A., Lavoue, G., Dupont, F., & Hudelot, C. (2015). 3D mesh compression: Survey, comparisons, and emerging trends. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(3), 1–41. doi: 10.1145/2693443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, F., Castagnetti, C., Rossi, P., Dubbini, M., Fazio, N. L., Perrotti, M., & Lollino, P. (2017). An integrated procedure to assess the stability of coastal rocky cliffs: From UAV close-range photogrammetry to geomechanical finite element modeling. Remote Sensing, 9(1235), 1–24. doi: 10.3390/rs9121235
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, J., Soria-Medina, A., Arias, P., & Buffara-Antunes, A. F. (2012). Automatic processing of terrestrial laser scanning data of building façades. Automation in Construction, 22, 298–305. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Carricondo, P., Carvajal-Ramírez, F., Yero-Paneque, L., & Agüera-Vega, F. (2019). Combination of nadiral and oblique UAV photogrammetry and HBIM for the virtual reconstruction of cultural heritage. Case study of Cortijo del Fraile in Níjar, Almería (Spain). Building Research and Information, 48(2), 140–159. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2019.1626213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajak, K., & Blaszczak-Bak, W. (2019). Baltic sea level changes from satellite altimetry data based on the OptD method. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 16(3), 235–244. doi: 10.13168/AGG.2019.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J., Kim, C. S., & Kuo, C. C. J. (2005). Technologies for 3D mesh compression: A survey. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 16(6), 688–733. doi: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesci, A., & Teza, G. (2008). Effects of surface irregularities on intensity data from laser scanning: An experimental approach. Annals of Geophysics, 51(5/6), 839–848. doi: 10.4401/ag-4462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, A. J., Vásquez, V., Silva, A., Horn, A., Alejandre, F. J., & Macías-Bernal, J. M. (2019). Protection value and functional service life of heritage timber buildings. Building Research and Information, 47(5), 567–584. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2017.1404827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riveiro, B., Morer, P., Arias, P., & De Arteaga, I. (2011). Terrestrial laser scanning and limit analysis of masonry arch bridges. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1726–1735. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., Del Pozo, S., Ramos, L. F., Arce, A., & Fernandes, F. M. (2018). Heritage site preservation with combined radiometric and geometric analysis of TLS data. Automation in Construction, 85, 24–39. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan, J., Samet, H., & Varshney, A. (2007). A fast all nearest neighbor algorithm for applications involving large point-clouds. Computers and Graphics, 31(2), 157–174. doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2006.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, A., Neves, L. C., Gaspar, P. L., & De Brito, J. (2016). Probabilistic transition of condition: Render facades. Building Research and Information, 44(3), 301–318. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2015.1023645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stateczny, A., Błaszczak-Bak, W., Sobieraj-Złobińska, A., Motyl, W., & Wisniewska, M. (2019). Methodology for processing of 3D multibeam sonar big data for comparative navigation. Remote Sensing, 11(19), 1–23. doi: 10.3390/rs11192245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchocki, C., & Błaszczak-Bąk, W. (2019). Down-sampling of point clouds for the technical diagnostics of buildings and structures. Geosciences, 9(2), 1–14. doi: 10.3390/geosciences9020070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchocki, C., & Katzer, J. (2018). Terrestrial laser scanning harnessed for moisture detection in building materials – problems and limitations. Automation in Construction, 94, 127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchocki, C., Katzer, J., & Panuś, A. (2017). Remote sensing to estimate saturation differences of chosen building materials using terrestrial laser scanner. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 103(1), 94–105. doi: 10.1515/rgg-2017-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, K., & Cheng, X. (2017). Specular reflection effects elimination in terrestrial laser scanning intensity data using Phong model. Remote Sensing, 9(8), 1–15. doi: 10.3390/rs9080853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teza, G., Galgaro, A., Zaltron, N., & Genevois, R. (2007). Terrestrial laser scanner to detect landslide displacement fields: A new approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(5), 3425–3446. doi: 10.1080/01431160601024234
   Google Scholar
• Valença, J., Puente, I., Júlio, E., González-Jorge, H., & Arias-Sánchez, P. (2017). Assessment of cracks on concrete bridges using image processing supported by laser scanning survey. Construction and Building Materials, 146, 668–678. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visvalingam, M., & Whyatt, J. D. (1993). Line generalisation by repeated elimination of points. The Cartographic Journal. doi: 10.1179/000870493786962263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voegtle, T., Schwab, I., & Landes, T. (2008). Influences of different materials on the measurements of a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS). Proceedings of the XXI ISPRS Congress. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XXXVII, pp. 1061–1066. Part B5. Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, T., Xu, L., Li, X., & Yao, J. (2018). Detection of water leakage in underground tunnels using corrected intensity data and 3D point cloud of terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Access, XX, 1–9. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2889501
   Google Scholar
• Xu, T., Xu, L., Yang, B., Li, X., & Yao, J. (2017). Terrestrial laser scanning intensity correction by piecewise fitting and overlap-driven adjustment. Remote Sensing, 9(11), 1–16. doi: 10.3390/rs9111090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Shi, G., & Cai, Y. (2015). A method for AIS track data compression based on Douglas-Peucker algorithm. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 36(5), 595–599. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.201401013
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., & Shi, G. (2018). A method for simplifying ship trajectory based on improved Douglas–Peucker algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 166, 37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar