Integrating energy efficiency into private home repair, maintenance and improvement practice in England and Wales

References

• Bergman, N., & Foxon, T. J. (2020). Reframing policy for the energy efficiency challenge: Insights from housing retrofits in the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science, 63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101386
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, B., Darby, S., killip, G., Hinnells, M., Jardine, C. N., Palmer, J., & Sinden, G. (2005). 40% house. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfield, P. (2016). Each home counts: An independent review of consumer advice, protection, standards and enforcement for energy efficiency and renewable energy. UK Government: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy & Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. (2018). PAS2035: 2019 retrofitting dwellings for improved energy efficiency: Specification and guidance (draft for peer review and public comment).
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, M., Clarke, L., & Winch, C. (2010a). The apprenticeship framework in england: A new beginning or a continuing sham? Journal of Education and Work, 23(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13639081003627439
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann, M., Clarke, L., & Winch, C. (2010b). Bricklaying is more than Flemish bond: Bricklaying qualifications in Europe. Bricklaying Qualifications, Work and VET in Europe (Leonardo do Vinci Project, European Commission DG Education and Culture, Lifelong Learning Programme) CLR: the European Institute for Construction Labour Research.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D., Wheately, H., Kumar, C., & Marshall, J. (2020). A Green stimulus for housing: The macroeconomic impacts of a UK whole house retrofit programme. New Economics Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Building Performance Institute Europe. (2016). Trigger points as a ‘must’ in national renovation strategies. Policy Factsheet.
   Google Scholar
• Building Research Establishment. (2017). Post installation performance of cavity wall and external wall insulation. Constructing Excellence in Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, L., Gleeson, C. P., & Winch, C. (2017). What kind of expertise is needed for low energy construction? Construction Management and Economics, 35(3), 78–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1248988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Climate Change. (2018). Reducing UK emissions: 2018 progress report to parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Climate Change. (2019). Reducing UK emissions: 2019 progress report to parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Fuel Poverty. (2020). Fourth Annual report. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2011). The good research guide. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2019). Energy consumption in the UK (ECUK) 1970 to 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy and Climate Change. (2014). UK national energy efficiency action plan.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Saving Trust. (2011). Trigger points: A convenient truth. EST.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, T., & Mayne, R. (2012). Exploring an ‘over time’ model of eco-renovation. Retrofit 2012, University of Salford, Salfrod Quays.
   Google Scholar
• Federation of Master Builders. (2018). Raising the bar: A post-grenfell agenda for quality and professionalism in construction. www.fmb.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio–technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6-7), 897–920. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese, A., Koh, S. C. L., & Acquaye, A. (2013). Energy efficiency retrofitting services supply chains: Evidence about stakeholders and configurations from the yorskhire and humber region case. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D., & O'Neill, K. (2014). Rethinking sociotechnical transitions and Green entrepreneurship: The potential for transformative change in the Green building sector. Environment and Planning A, 46(5), 1088–1107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a46259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction, Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hansford, P. (2015). Solid wall insulation: Unlocking demand and driving up standards. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• H M Government. (2001). UK Fuel Poverty Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• H M Government. (2008). Climate Change Act.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5°C.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, K. B., & Parag, Y. (2013). A middle-out approach for improving energy performance in buildings. Building Research and Information, 41(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.743396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, M., & Curtis, R. (2014). Improving energy efficiency in traditional buildings. Information for historic building owners. Historic Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2017). Policy packaging or policy patching? The development of complex energy efficiency policy mixes. Energy Research and Social Science, 23, 11–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killip, G. (2011). Implications of an 80% CO2 reduction target for small and medium sized enterprises in the UK housing refurbishment industry [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Killip, G., Fawcett, T., Janda, K. B., Beillan, V., & Nösperger, S. (2013). Building expertise: Industry responses to the low-energy housing retrofit agenda in the UK and France. ECEEE summer study 2013 – rethink, renew, restart, European council for an energy efficient economy, Presqu'ile de Giens, France, 3rd-8th 2013, 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2016). Innovation towards low energy buildings and the role of intermediaries in the transition – review of scholarly case studies in Europe. In K. Kähkönen, & M. Keinänen (Eds.), CIB World building congress 2016, Tampere. Tampere University of Technology. Department of Civil Engineering. Construction Management and Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, L., Marchand, R., Genovese, A., & Brennan, A. (2012). Fuel poverty – perspectives from the front line. University of Sheffield, Centre for Energy, Environment and Sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Maby, C. (2019). Enabling the integration of energy improvements into mainstream home repair, maintenance and improvement practice in the UK. Doctor of Philosophy, Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Maby, C., & Owen, A. (2015). Installer power: The key to unlocking low carbon retrofit in private housing. Severn Wye Energy Agency and University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Maller, C. J., & Horne, R. E. (2011). Living lightly: How does climate change feature in residential home improvements and what are the implications for policy? Urban Policy and Research, 29(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2011.539514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government. (2019a). The Future Homes Standard: 2019 Consultation on changes to Part L (conservation of fuel and power) and Part F (ventilation) of the Building Regulations for new dwellings.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government. (2019b). Statistical data set: Dwelling stock by tenure, United Kingdom (historical series). Table 101: Dwelling stock by tenure.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government. (2019c). Statistical data set: Live tables on house building: new build dwellings. Table 209: Permanent dwellings completed by tenure and country. October 2019 ed.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, N., Achkar, L., & Roberts, A. (2016). The people that no-one notices? The power of building control inspectors in sustainable construction. In P. W. Chan, & C. J. Neilson (Eds.), 32nd Annual ARCOM conference, Manchester (pp. 1151–1160). Association of Researchers in Construction Management, V.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2019a). Construction Statistics Great Britain 2018. Table 3.1a; Construction firms: number of firms, by size of firm. London.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2019b). EMP 14: Employees and self-employed by industry.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2020). Output in the Construction Industry. Table 7: Construction output value London.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, W., & Garmston, H. (2012). Building Regulations in energy efficiency: Compliance in England and Wales. Energy Policy, 45, 594–605. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., & Jaksch, C. (2016). Warmer and greener: A guide to the future of domestic energy efficiency policy. Westminster Sustainable Business Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Pye Tait Consulting. (2014). A potential system of regulation or licensing of domestic builders in Wales Cardiff: Welsh Government.
   Google Scholar
• Pye Tait Consulting. (2018). Licence to build: A pathway to licensing UK construction. Federation of Master Builders.
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications Wales. (2018). Building the future: Sector review of qualifications and the qualification system in construction and the built environment.
   Google Scholar
• RIBA. (2013). RIBA Plan of Work.
   Google Scholar
• Rickaby, P. (2015). Where does retrofit go wrong? Retrofit Summit, Stoke on Trent, UK. Centre of Refurbishment Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. G., Cooper, S. J. G., O'Grady, Á, McManus, M. C., Howard, H. R., & Hammond, G. P. (2015). The 20% house – An integrated assessment of options for reducing net carbon emissions from existing UK houses. Applied Energy, 138, 108–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistical Release: National Statistics. (2019). 1990-2017 total greenhouse gas emissions by end user. Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, L., & Santini, M. (2020). Filling the policy gap: Minimum energy performance standards for European buildings Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP).
   Google Scholar
• The Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings. (2014). Energy efficiency in old buildings. S.P.A.B. Briefing. S.P.A.B.
   Google Scholar
• Tweed, C. (2013). Socio-technical issues in dwelling retrofit. Building Research and Information, 41(5), 551–562. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.815047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, F., Hitchings, R., & Shipworth, M. (2016). Understanding the missing middlemen of domestic heating: Installers as a community of practice in the United Kingdom. Energy Research and Social Science, 19, 39–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, F., Murtagh, N., & Hitchings, R. (2017). Managing professional jurisdiction and domestic energy use. Building Research & Information, 46(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1324698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar