The influence of virtual human representations on first-year architecture students’ perceptions of digitally designed spaces: a pilot study

References

• Aburamadan, R., & Trillo, C. (2020). Applying design science approach to architectural design development. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9(1), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. T. (2002). On the human figure in architectural representation. Journal of Architectural Education, 55(4), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1162/104648802753657941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates-Brkljac, N. (2009). Assessing perceived credibility of traditional and computer generated architectural representations. Design Studies, 30(4), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519167
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, G. P., Bradley, A., Bailey, M., & Vinner, R. (2001). Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(6), 1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.6.1314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, I. D., & Rohrmann, B. (2003). Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00070-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, S. (2020). Using virtual reality to improve visual recognition skills of first year architecture students: A comparative study. CSEDU (2).
   Google Scholar
• Ceylan, S., Şahin, P., Seçmen, S., Somer, M. E., & Süher, K. H. (2021). An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID-19 outbreak. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. S., Chien, Y. H., Lin, H. C., Chen, M. Y., & Hsieh, H. H. (2016). Effects of 3D CAD applications on the design creativity of students with different representational abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colonnese, F. (2012). Man As measure: Human figure in modern architectural drawings. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Colonnese, F. (2017). Human figure as a cultural mediator in architectural drawings. In G. Koç, M.-T. Claes & B. Christiansen (Eds.), Cultural influences on architecture (pp. 90–129). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. C., & Meitner, M. M. (2001). Representational validity of landscape visualizations: The effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Klerk, R., Duarte, A. M., Medeiros, D. P., Duarte, J. P., Jorge, J., & Lopes, D. S. (2019). Usability studies on building early stage architectural models in virtual reality. Automation in Construction, 103, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deliktas, B. (2011). Computer technology for enhancing teaching and learning modules of engineering mechanics. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 19(3), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Sánchez, M. T., & Martínez Díaz, Á. (2020). Inhabited drawings: A century of manners of representing the architecture experience. In L. Agustín-Hernández, A. Vallespín Muniesa & A. Fernández-Morales (Eds.), Graphical Heritage. EGA 2020. Springer Series in Design and Innovation (Vol. 5). Cham: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1952). The perception of the visual world. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (2014). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740218
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Tone, H. C., Manchego-Huaquipaco, E. G., & Calcino-Caceres, M. A. (2021). The digital perception of architectural space. In 2021 62nd International Scientific Conference on Information Technology and Management Science of Riga Technical University (ITMS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMS52826.2021.9615339
   Google Scholar
• Haber, R. N., & Levin, C. A. (2001). The independence of size perception and distance perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(7), 1140–1152. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H., & Nasar, J. L. (2000). Evaluating environmental scenes using dynamic versus static displays. Environment and Behavior, 32(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916500323001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. W., Kim, H., Song, Y., Yoon, S. H., & Lee, J. (2020). Effects of human behavior simulation on usability factors of social sustainability in architectural design education. Sustainability, 12(17), 7111. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. W., & Lee, Y. G. (2018). The effects of human behavior simulation on architecture major students’ fire egress planning. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 17(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.17.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. W., & Lee, Y. G. (2019). Behavioural responsiveness of virtual users for students’ creative problem-finding in architectural design. Architectural Science Review, 62(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2019.1594673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S. W., Schaumann, D., & Kalay, Y. E. (2016). Human behavior simulation in architectural design projects: An observational study in an academic course. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 60, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., He, X., Ma, X., Ren, Y., Zhao, T., Zeng, X., Li, H., & Chen, Y. (2018). Sequential biases on subjective judgments: Evidence from face attractiveness and ringtone agreeableness judgment. PloS One, 13(6), e0198723. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, R. (2003). Architects’ conceptions of the human body. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1068/d271t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalalian, A., Chalup, S. K., & Ostwald, M. J. (2011). Architectural evaluation of simulated pedestrian spatial behaviour. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kalay, Y. E. (2004). Architecture's new media: Principles, theories, and methods of computer-aided design. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. Y. (2019). A design methodology using prototyping based on the digital-physical models in the architectural design process. Sustainability, 11(16), 4416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, R. S., Jones, A. L., & Sharma, D. (2013). Sequential effects in judgements of attractiveness: The influences of face race and sex. PloS One, 8(12), e82226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. L., & Lee, Y. (2021). Developing an autonomous psychological behaviour of virtual user to atypical architectural geometry. Building Research & Information, 49(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2020.1786348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. L., & Lee, Y. G. (2019). Developing an autonomous behavior of virtual users based on psychological interpretation of human behavior to an atypical architectural shape. International Journal of ICT-Aided Architecture and Civil Engineering, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21742/IJIACE.2019.6.1.01
   Google Scholar
• Lesik, S. A. (2018). Applied statistical inference with MINITAB®. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429444951
   Google Scholar
• Loyola, M. (2018). The influence of the availability of visual cues on the accurate perception of spatial dimensions in architectural virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 22(3), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0331-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscogiuri, M. (2013). Concept modeling and sketching: Towards a new heuristic architectural design in digital era. MO. DI. PHY. Modeling from Digital to Physical: Innovation in Design Languages and Project Procedures.
   Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L. (2008). Assessing perceptions of environments for active living. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(4), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadonikolaki, E., Krystallis, I., & Morgan, B. (2021). Digital technologies in built environment projects: Review and Future directions. Project Management Journal, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211070225
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., Jin, Y., Ahn, S., & Lee, S. (2019). The impact of design representation on visual perception: Comparing eye-tracking data of architectural scenes between photography and line drawing. Archives of Design Research, 32(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.15187/ADR.2019.02.32.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Rajab, M., Chaudhry, A. R., & Cherian, M. (2019). The development of 3D visualization and its potential impact on interior design and its clients. 2019 Sixth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT), https://doi.org/10.1109/ITT48889.2019.9075098
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. G., Card, S. K., & Mackinlay, J. D. (1993). Three views of virtual reality: Nonimmersive virtual reality. Computer, 26(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.192002
   Google Scholar
• Roupé, M., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., & Johansson, M. (2014). Interactive navigation interface for virtual reality using the human body. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 43, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama, A. M. (2016). Spatial design education: New directions for pedagogy in architecture and beyond. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315610276
   Google Scholar
• Scarpa, C., & Frascari, M. (1987). The president and fellows of Harvard College Peabody museum of archaeology and ethnology the body and architecture in the drawings of. Source: Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 14, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1086/RESv14n1ms20166778
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, D. (2014). The death of drawing: Architecture in the age of simulation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813950
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, H. (2021). JJ Gibson’s “ground theory of space perception”. i-Perception, 12(3), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695211021111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X. (2010). Performance-based and performance-driven architectural design and optimization. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 4(4), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0090-6
   Google Scholar
• Shi, X., & Yang, W. (2013). Performance-driven architectural design and optimization technique from a perspective of architects. Automation in Construction, 32, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeone, D., Kalay, Y., Schaumann, D., & Hong, S. (2013). Modelling and simulating use processes in buildings. In Computation and Performance–Proceedings of the 31st eCAADe Conference, Faculty of Architecture, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, September 18-20, vol. 2, pp. 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman, A. M. (2017). Appropriate teaching and learning strategies for the architectural design process in pedagogic design studios. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 6(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps IIIA. E. (1993). Simulation effects on environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 38(2), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1993.1033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, G. J., Bienz, T., Wali, N., Condie, J., & Schismenos, S. (2021). Online university education is the new normal: But is face-to-face better? Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(3), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak, V., de Vriesh, B., & Dijkstra, J. (2010). Simulation and validation of human movement in building spaces. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), 592–609. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35127
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S., Berry, L. L., Quan, X., & Parish, J. T. (2010). A conceptual framework for the domain of evidence-based design. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(1), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/193758671000400107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, A., & Jafri, M. S. (2021). COVID-19 responsive teaching of undergraduate architecture programs in India: Learnings for post-pandemic education. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 15(1), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Castell, C., Oberfeld, D., & Hecht, H. (2014). The effect of furnishing on perceived spatial dimensions and spaciousness of interior space. PloS One, 9(11), e113267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. (2009). Rethinking teaching with information and communication technologies (ICTs) in architectural education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, W., & Kalay, Y. (2006). “Geometric, Cognitive, and Behavioral Modeling of Environmental Users”. In J.S. Gero (Ed.), Design Computing and Cognition' 06, (vol. 1, 61–79). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., Byun, E., Chung, N. S., Wrtual, K., & After, H. (2000). Comparison of space perception between a real environment and a virtual environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 44(5), 515–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120004400508
   Google Scholar
• Zobel, R. W. (1995). The representation of experience in architectural design. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1995.4.3.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar