Are workspaces gender neutral? A literature review and a research agenda

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, S. J., Heywood, J. S., & Miller, L. A. (2012). Caregivers, firm policies and gender discrimination claims. Review of Economics of the Household, 12(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-012-9169-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins, L. (1999). Community and economy: A retraditionalization of gender? Theory,Culture and Society, 16(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327699016001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, L. M. M. C. E., Tam, V. W. Y., Le, K. N., Huang, Z., & Forbes, S. (2020). Survey of energy-related occupant perceptions in a green-rated and in a non-rated building. Advances in Building Energy Research, 16(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2020.1768897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The new industrial revolution. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Ardener, S. (1993). Women and space: Ground rules and social maps. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Aroles, J., Mitev, N., & de Vaujany, F.-X. (2019). Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B., Kreiner, G., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. The Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.2307/259305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, A. L. (2004). Female artistic identity in place: The studio. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360410001690204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldry, C. (1999). Space – the final frontier. Sociology, 33(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038599000346
   Google Scholar
• Banks, M., & Milestone, K. (2010). Individualization, gender and cultural work. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskin, E., Gorlin, M., Chance, Z., Novemsky, N., Dhar, R., Huskey, K., & Hatzis, M. (2016). Proximity of snacks to beverages increases food consumption in the workspace: A field study. Appetite, 103, 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, J. C., & Murray, M. A. (2018). Leave your emotions at home”: Bereavement, organizational space, and professional identity. Women’s Studies in Communication, 41(1), 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2018.1424061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, V., Farmer, N. M., & Kerr, B. A. (2015). An exploration of women’s engagement in makerspaces. Gifted and Talented International, 30(1-2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2015.1137456
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1, Part 2), S33–S58. https://doi.org/10.1086/298075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y. (2009). Making safer places: Gender and the right to the city. Security Journal, 22(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Conner, T.-L., & Fisek, M. H. (eds.). (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Winthrop.
   Google Scholar
• Bettis, R. A. (2011). The search for asterisks: Compromised statistical tests and flawed theories. Strategic Management Journal, 33(1), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyes, T., & Steyaert, C. (2011). Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, 19(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411401946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin Danielsson, C., Bodin, L., Wulff, C., & and Theorell, T. (2015). The relation between office type and workplace conflict: A gender and noise perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin Danielsson, C., Chungkham, H. S., Wulff, C., & Westerlund, H. (2014). Office design’s impact on sick leave rates. Ergonomics, 57(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2013.871064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin Danielsson, C., & Theorell, T. (2019). Office employees’ perception of workspace contribution: A gender and office design perspective. Environment and Behavior, 51(9-10), 995–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518759146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin Danielsson, C., Wulff, C., & Westerlund, H. (2013). Is perception of leadership influenced by office environment? Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 15(3/4), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-03-2013-0008
   Google Scholar
• Bono, J. E., & McNamara, G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ – Part 2: Research design. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 657–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64869103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolini, R., & Forcada, N. (2021). Regular and temporary occupants’ perceptions of satisfaction in tertiary education buildings. Ergonomics, 4(7), 926–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1882706
   Google Scholar
• Bosak, L., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). The impact of social roles on trait judgments: A critical reexamination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(4), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211427308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno, S., Rodríguez-Baltanás, G., & Gallego, M. D. (2018). Coworking spaces: A new way of achieving productivity. Journal of Facilities Management, 16(4), 452–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-01-2018-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, B., Reuschke, D., & Zhang, M. (2021). Spatial and temporal segmenting of urban workplaces: The gendering of multi-locational working. Urban Studies, 58(11), 2207–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020903248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Candido, C., Marzban, S., Haddad, S., Mackey, M., & Loder, A. (2020). Designing healthy workspaces: Results from Australian certified open-plan offices. Facilities, 39(5/6), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/f-02-2020-0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. H., & Moon, J. (2017). Impacts of human and spatial factors on user satisfaction in office environments. Building and Environment, 114, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Aziz, A., & Loftness, V. (2010). Investigation on the impacts of different genders and ages on satisfaction with thermal environments in office buildings. Building and Environment, 45(6), 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-H., & Lee, K. (2018). Investigation of the feasibility of POE methodology for a modern commercial office building. Building and Environment, 143, 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-H., & Yeom, D. (2019). Development of the data-driven thermal satisfaction prediction model as a function of human physiological responses in a built environment. Building and Environment, 150, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., & van der Horst, M. (2018). Flexible working and unpaid overtime in the UK: The role of gender, parental and occupational status. Social Indicators Research, 151, 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organisation and the organisation of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. Palgrave/McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsson, C. B., Bodin, L., Wulff, C., & Theorell, T. (2015). The relation between office type and workplace conflict: A gender and noise perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Been, I., & Beijer, M. (2014). The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2013-0011
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, D., Meijers, E., & van Ham, M. (2018). Working from home and the willingness to accept a longer commute. The Annals of Regional Science, 61, 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0873-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Blasio, S., Shtrepi, L., Puglisi, G., & Astolfi, A. (2019). A cross-sectional survey on the impact of irrelevant speech noise on annoyance, mental health and well-being, performance and occupants’ behavior in shared and open-plan offices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(2), 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291173011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 181–224. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essig, E., & Soparnot, R. (2019). Re-thinking gender inequality in the workplace – a framework from the male perspective. Management, 22(3), 373–410. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.223.0373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonner, K. L., & Stache, L. C. (2012). All in a day’s work, at home: Teleworkers’ management of micro role transitions and the work-home boundary. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(3), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frontczak, M., Schiavon, S., Goins, J., Arens, E., Zhang, H., & Wargocki, P. (2012). Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air, 22(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S., & Hirsh, C. E. (2019). “Family-Friendly” jobs and motherhood pay penalties: The impact of flexible work arrangements across the educational spectrum. Work and Occupations, 46(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888418771116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., & Rose, G. (2000). Taking Butler elsewhere: Performativities, spatialities and subjectivities. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(4), 433–452. https://doi.org/10.1068/d232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Towards a corporeal feminism. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, S. (2006). Collapsing the boundaries? Fatherhood, organization and home-working. Gender, Work and Organization, 13(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halford, S., & Leonard, P. (2003). Space and place in the construction and performance of gendered nursing identities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02601.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. L. (2009). ‘Caring/sharing': Gender and horizontal co-ordination in the workspace. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(1), e23–e48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00468.x
   Google Scholar
• Hartog, L., Weijs-Perrée, M., & Appel-Meulenbroek, R. (2018). The influence of personality on user satisfaction: multi-tenant offices. Building Research & Information, 46(4), 402–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1307015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, B., Suckley, L., & Nunnington, N. (2017). Workspace productivity and office type. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 19(2), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-11-2016-0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazak, A., Männasoo, K., & Virkebau, M. (2017). Effects of work arrangements on creative R&D work outcomes. Eastern European Economics, 55(6), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2017.1381567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., & Borjas, G. J. (1980). Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Economica, 47(187), 247. https://doi.org/10.2307/2553150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedge, A. (1984). Evidence of a relationship between office design and self-reports of ill health among office workers in the United Kingdom. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 1(3), 163–174. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43028693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workspace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, 32, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Heinzen, M., Cacciatori, E., Zoller, F. A., & Boutellier, R. (2018). Who talks to whom about what? How interdisciplinary communication and knowledge of expertise distribution improve in integrated R&D labs. Ergonomics, 61(8), 1139–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1449254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendler, S. (2005). Towards a feminist code of planning ethics. Planning Theory & Practice, 6(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000334967
   Google Scholar
• Hills, R., & Levy, D. (2014). Workspace design and fit-out: What knowledge workers value. Property Management, 32(5), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-02-2014-0011
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, A., & Schwabenland, C. (2018). Doing gender in the ‘new office’. Gender, Work & Organization, 25(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1989). Reply to Cas Wouters’ review essay on the managed heart. Theory, Culture & Society, 6(3), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327689006003005
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. C. (1999). Bringing work home: Developing a model residentially-based Telework facility. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 8(2), 119–142. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44318008
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. C., Andrey, J., & Shaw, S. M. (2007). Mr. Dithers comes to dinner: Telework and the merging of women’s work and home domains in Canada. Gender, Place & Culture, 14(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690701213701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, S. (2007). Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments. Building and Environment, 42(4), 1594–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, S. (2012). Thermal comfort and gender: A literature review. Indoor Air, 22(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann-Buhler, J. (2016). Progressive partitions: The promises and problems of the American open plan office. Design and Culture, 8(2), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2016.1189308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelan, E. K. (2017). Men doing and Undoing gender at work: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshbakht, M., Baird, G., & Rasheed, E. O. (2020). The influence of work group size and space sharing on the perceived productivity, overall comfort and health of occupants in commercial and academic buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(5), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20912312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshbakht, M., Gou, Z., Xie, X., He, B., & Darko, A. (2018). Green building occupant satisfaction: Evidence from the Australian Higher Education Sector. Sustainability, 10(8), 2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., de Dear, R., Cândido, C., Zhang, H., & Arens, E. (2013). Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Building and Environment, 70, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojo, I., & Nenonen, S. (2014). Evolution of co-working places: Drivers and possibilities. Intelligent Buildings International, 9(3), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2014.987640
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D., & McGinn, K. (2009). Beyond gender and negotiation to gendered negotiation. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00024.x
   Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. (2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25(7), 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604046312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwallek, N., & Lewis, C. M. (1990). Effects of environmental colour on males and females: A red or white or green office. Applied Ergonomics, 21(4), 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(90)90197-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laegran, A. S. (2008). Domesticating home anchored work: Negotiating flexibility when bringing ICT based work home in rural communities. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 39(6), 1991–1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Re-assembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, S., Newsham, G. R., Veitch, J. A., Mancini, S., & Charles, K. E. (2016). Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: A new analysis. Building Research & Information, 44(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.1003176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Park, M. H., & Jeong, B. Y. (2017). Gender differences in public office workers’ satisfaction, subjective symptoms and musculoskeletal complaints in workspace and office environments. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 24(2), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2016.1272959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. (1974/1991). The production of space. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1942). Field theory and learning. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin (pp. 60–86). Science Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Limbers, C. A., McCollum, C., & Greenwood, E. (2020). Physical activity moderates the association between parenting stress and quality of life in working mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 19, 100358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2020.100358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, I., Akhavan, M., & Rossi, F. (2021). The preferred location of coworking spaces in Italy: An empirical investigation in urban and peripheral areas. European Planning Studies, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, identity and place. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey. (2022). Beyond gender: Promoting diversity in French companies. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, R. L., & Macky, K. A. (2017). The demands and resources arising from shared office spaces. Applied Ergonomics, 60, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, R. L., & Smollan, R. K. (2020). Open plan office space? If you’re going to do it, do it right: A fourteen-month longitudinal case study. Applied Ergonomics, 82, 102933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munsch, C. L., Ridgeway, C. L., & Williams, J. C. (2014). Pluralistic ignorance and the flexibility bias: Understanding and mitigating flextime and flexplace bias at work. Work and Occupations, 41(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888413515894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, L. (2018). Gendered places: Place, performativity and flânerie in the city of London. Gender, Work & Organization, 25(6), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ne’eman, E., Sweitzer, G., & Vine, E. (1984). Office worker response to lighting and daylighting issues in workspace environments: A pilot survey. Energy and Buildings, 6(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(84)90071-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezis, I., Biskos, G., Eleftheriadis, K., & Kalantzi, O.-I. (2019). Particulate matter and health effects in offices – A review. Building and Environment, 156, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2016-en
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts and how they get you through the day. Paragon House.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mara, M. (1999). Strategy and place. Managing Corporate Real Estate and facilities for competitive advantage. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oracle. (2021). Addressing diversity and inclusion: Going beyond the benchmark. https://www.oracle.com/uk/human-capital-management/diversity-and-inclusion/report/
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayiotou, A. (2014). Spacing gender, gendering space: A radical strong plot in film. Management Learning, 46(49), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507614541200
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, A. T., Reid, R., McKerrow, H., & Wright, D. (2017). Evaluating positivist theories of occupant satisfaction: A statistical analysis. Building Research & Information, 46(4), 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1314148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, E. (2019). Where does work belong? Home-based work and communication technology within the American middle-class postwar home. Technology and Culture, 60(2), 523–552. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2019.0034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peteri, V., Lempiäinen, K., & Kinnunen, M. (2021). From cubicles to open space: An analysis of gendered meanings of workspace. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(2), 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420902792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platts, L. G., Seddigh, A., Berntson, E., & Westerlund, H. (2020). Sickness absence and sickness presence in relation to office type: An observational study of employer-recorded and self-reported data from Sweden. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0231934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J.-L. L. (2019). “Ease to fit”: managing the intersection of “public” and “private” in dressmakers lives in Australia. Gender, Place & Culture, 27(10), 1481–1500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2019.1693348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J., & McKenna, S. (2013). Reordering spatial and social relations: A case study of professional and managerial flexworkers. British Journal of Management, 25(4), 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robelski, S., Keller, H., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2019). Coworking spaces: The better home office? A psychosocial and health-related perspective on an emerging work environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roderick, I. (2016). Representing affective labour and gender performativity in knowledge work: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. Gender and Language, 10(3), 386–411. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v10i3.32040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Modroño, P. (2021). Non-standard work in unconventional workspaces: Self-employed women in home-based businesses and coworking spaces. Urban Studies, 58(11), 2258–2275. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211007406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp, R. F., Kim, J., Ghisi, E., & de Dear, R. (2019). Thermal sensitivity of occupants in different building typologies: The Griffiths constant is a variable. Energy and Buildings, 200, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.07.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakellaris, I., Saraga, D., Mandin, C., Roda, C., Fossati, S., de Kluizenaar, Y., … Bluyssen, P. (2016). Perceived indoor Environment and occupants’ comfort in European “modern” office buildings: The OFFICAIR study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, A. C., Yavorsky, J. E., & Sandoval, R. G. (2021). Organizational logic in coworking spaces: Inequality regimes in the new economy. Gender & Society, 35(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220974691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavon, S., & Altomonte, S. (2014). Influence of factors unrelated to environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Building and Environment, 77, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd-Banigan, M., Bell, J. F., Basu, A., Booth-LaForce, C., & Harris, J. R. (2015). Workplace stress and working from home influence depressive symptoms among employed women with young children. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-015-9482-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinicropi, S., & Cortese, D. (2021). (Re)Thinking diversity within sustainable development: A systematic mapping study. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang Våland, M., & Georg, S. (2018). Spacing identity: Unfolding social and spatial-material entanglements of identity performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational space. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toomingas, A., Forsman, M., Mathiassen, S. E., Heiden, M., & Nilsson, T. (2012). Variation between seated and standing/walking postures among male and female call centre operators. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D. R., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, D.-G., & Thomsin, L. (2012). Telework and mobile working: Analysis of its benefits and drawbacks. International Journal of Work Innovation, 1(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWI.2012.047995
   Google Scholar
• Troup, C., & Rose, J. (2012). Working from home: Do formal or informal telework arrangements provide better work–family outcomes? Community, Work & Family, 15(4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2012.724220
   Google Scholar
• Turesky, M., & Warner, M. E. (2020). Gender dynamics in the planning workplace. Journal of the American Planning Association, 86(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1691041
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M., & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609357381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Voordt, T., Bakker, I., & de Boon, J. (2017). Color preferences for four different types of spaces. Facilities, 35(3/4), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-06-2015-0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, V. (2012). Open spaces, closed boundaries: Transparent workspaces as clerical female ghettos. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2012.048589
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, V., & Frenkel, M. (2015). Spatial Work in Between Glass Ceilings and Glass Walls: Gender-Class Intersectionality and Organizational aesthetics. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1485–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijs-Perrée, M., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Arentze, T., & Romme, G. (2019a). The influence of personal- and business centre characteristics on knowledge sharing types in business centres. Facilities, 37(1/2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-07-2017-0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijs-Perrée, M., Bück, L., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2019b). Location choices of face-to-face interactions in academic buildings: An experience sampling approach. Ergonomics, 62(12), 1499–1514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2019.1660419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinfurtner, T., & Seidl, D. (2018). Towards a spatial perspective: An integrative review of research on organisational space. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, M. M. (2000). Office clutter or meaningful personal displays: The role of office personalization in employee and organizational well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, A. H., Usdan, S. L., Knowlden, A. P., Leeper, J. L., Birch, D. A., & Hibberd, E. E. (2018). Ecological influences on employees’ workspace sedentary behavior: A cross-sectional study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 2(8), 1688–1696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118767717
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, T. (2016). Women’s experience of workspace interactions in male-dominated work: The intersections of gender, sexuality and occupational group. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(3), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, C. A. (2011). Organizing women in the spaces between home, work and community. Relations Industrielles, 66(4), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.7202/1007635ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerkes, M. A., André, S. C. H., Besamusca, J. W., Kruyen, P. M., Remery, C. L. H. S., van der Zwan, R., Beckers, D. B .J., & Geurts, S. A. E. (2020). ‘Intelligent’ lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 lockdown. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0242249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, T. M., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2020). The differential impact of COVID-19 on the work conditions of women and men academics during the lockdown. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(S1), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12529
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, F., & de Dear, R. (2019). Impacts of demographic, contextual and interaction effects on thermal sensation – evidence from a global database. Building and Environment, 162, 106286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Spicer, A. (2013). “Leader, you first”: The everyday production of hierarchical space in a Chinese bureaucracy. Human Relations, 67(6), 739–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713503021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar