Making sense of smart features in the smart office: a stated choice experiment of office user preferences

References

• Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Oussena, S., & Burns, C. (2015). Human work interaction design of the Smart University. In J. Abdelnour Nocera, B. Barricelli, A. Lopes, P. Campos, & T. Clemmensen (Eds.), Human work interaction design. Work analysis and interaction design methods for pervasive and smart workplaces. HWID 2015 IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (p. 468). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7
   Google Scholar
• Al Horr, Y., Arif, M., Kaushik, A., Mazroei, A., Katafygiotou, M., & Elsarrag, E. (2016). Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature. Building and Environment, 105(15), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Alberdi, A., Weakley, A., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Cook, D. J., Aztiria, A., Basarab, A., & Barrenechea, M. (2018). Smart home-based prediction of multidomain symptoms related to Alzheimer's disease. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(6), 1720–1731. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2018.2798062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Clippard, M., & Pfnür, A. (2018). The effectiveness of physical office environments for employee outcomes: An interdisciplinary perspective of research efforts. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 20(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-04-2017-0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Le Blanc, P., & de Kort, Y. (2019). Person–environment fit: Optimizing the physical work environment. Organizational Behaviour and the Physical Environment, 251–267. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167237-14
   Google Scholar
• Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Weijs-Perrée, M., Orel, M., Gauger, F., & Pfnür, A. (2021). User preferences for coworking spaces; a comparison between The Netherlands, Germany and the Czech Republic. Review of Managerial Science, 15(7), 2025–2048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00414-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aries, M. B. C., Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2010). Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barišić, A., Amaral, V., & Challenger, M. (2020). Enhancing Occupants Comfort and Well-being through a Smart Office setup. In 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia (pp. 1825–1830).
   Google Scholar
• Bati, A. C., Coşkun, E., Gözüaçık, Ö., İlhan, G., Şahin, F. A., Uncuoğlu, U., Güngen, M. A., & Telli, A. (2017). Iot based smart office application for advanced indoor working environment and energy efficiency. In 2017 25th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Antalya, Turkey (pp. 1–4) IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2017.7960664
   Google Scholar
• Bluyssen, P. M., Aries, M., & van Dommelen, P. (2011). Comfort of workers in office buildings: The European HOPE project. Building and Environment, 46(1), 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill, M., & Weidemann, S. (2001). Disproving widespread myths about workplace design. Kimball International.
   Google Scholar
• Budie, B., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Kemperman, A., & Weijs-Perree, M. (2019). Employee satisfaction with the physical work environment: The importance of a need based approach. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 23(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2019.6372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candido, C., Candido, C., Zhang, J., Kim, J., de Dear, R., Thomas, L., Strapasson, P., & Joko, C. (2016). Impact of workspace layout on occupant satisfaction, perceived health and productivity. 9th Windsor Conference: Making comfort relevant, Windsor Great Park, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cherchi, E., & Hensher, D. A. (2015). Workshop synthesis: Stated preference surveys and experimental design, an audit of the journey so far and future research perspectives. Transportation Research Procedia, 11, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.013
   Google Scholar
• Cicirelli, F., Fortino, G., Guerrieri, A., Spezzano, G., & Vinci, A. (2017). Metamodeling of smart environments: From design to implementation. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 33, 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements-Croome, D. (2006). Creating the productive workplace (2nd ed.). Oxford: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Clements-Croome, D. (2015). Creative and productive workplaces: A review. Intelligent Buildings International, 7(4), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2015.1019698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D. J., Augusto, J. C., & Jakkula, V. R. (2009). Ambient intelligence: Technologies, applications, and opportunities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5(4), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čulić, A., Šolić, P., Perković, T., & Čongradac, V. (2021). Smart monitoring technologies for personal thermal comfort: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, 127685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, C. B., Bodin, L., Wulff, C., & Theorell, T. (2015). The relation between office type and workplace conflict: A gender and noise perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson, C. B. & Bodin, L. (2008). Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 636–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507307459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Been, I., & Beijer, M. (2014). The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12(2), 6571. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-02-2013-0011
   Google Scholar
• De Been, I., Van Der Voordt, T., & Haynes, B. (2016). Productivity. In P.A. Jensen & T. van der Voordt (Eds.), Facilities management and corporate real estate management as value drivers (pp. 19). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315695150.
   Google Scholar
• D’oca, S., Ferrer, C., Pernetti, R., Gralka, A., & Sebastian, R. (2018). Technical, financial, and social barriers and challenges in deep building renovation: Integration of lessons learned from the H2020 cluster projects. Buildings, 8(12), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8120174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frontczak, M. J., Schiavon, S., Goins, J., Arens, E., Zhang, H., & Wargocki, P. (2011). Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air, 22(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00745.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frontczak, M., & Wargocki, P. (2011). Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Building and Environment, 46(4), 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasiu, A. D., & Veitch, J. A. (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 728–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddings, B., Thomas, J., & Little, L. (2013). Evaluation of the workplace environment in the UK, and the impact on users’ levels of stimulation. Indoor and Built Environment, 22(6), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X13476078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goins, J., Jellema, J., & Zhang, H. (2010). Architectural enclosure's effect on office worker performance: A comparison of the physical and symbolic attributes of workspace dividers. Building and Environment, 45(4), 944–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2003). A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 37(8), 681–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, G., Yang, D., Feng, T., & Timmermans, H. (2019). Influence of the adoption of new mobility tools on investments in home renewable energy equipment: Results of a stated choice experiment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., Weng, D., Zhang, Z., Jiang, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Duh, H. B. L. (2019). Mixed reality office system based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Towards the long-term immersion in virtual environments. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) (pp. 224–235). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., & Singer, B. (1984). Econometric duration analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 24(1), 63–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, R., & Levy, D. (2014). Workspace design and fit-out: What knowledge workers value. Property Management, 32(5), 2326. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-02-2014-0011
   Google Scholar
• Leesman. (2018). The Leesman index. www.leesmanindex.com/measure-employee-experience/
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, K., Salvendy, G., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). Smart home design and operation preferences of Americans and Koreans. Ergonomics, 53(5), 636–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903581623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, S., & Koistinen, O. (2007). User problems with individual temperature control in offices. Building and Environment, 42(8), 2880–2887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A. A., Wang, S., & Mccunn, L. J. (2019). Building value proposition for interactive lighting systems in the workplace: Combining energy and occupant perspectives. Journal of Building Engineering, 24, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Chung, K. (2019). Prediction model of user physical activity using data characteristics-based long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 13(4), 2060–2077. http://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2019.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokolakis, S. (2017). Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security, 64, 22–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, M., Remøy, H., & Van Den Dobbelsteen, A. (2019). User-focused office renovation: A review into user satisfaction and the potential for improvement. Property Management, 37(4), 470–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-04-2018-0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limesurvey: Project Team/Carstem Schmitz. (n.d.). LimeSurvey: An Open-Source Survey Tool. LimeSurvey Project, Hamburg, Germany. http://www.limesurvey.org
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Zhang, H., Li, J., Ye, C., & Hsieh, J. (2022). Evaluating smart office buildings from a sustainability perspective: A model of hybrid multi-attribute decision-making. Technology in Society, 68, 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Lee, S., Bilionis, I., Karava, P., Joe, J., & Sadeghi, S.A. (2021a). A user-interactive system for smart thermal environment control in office buildings. Applied Energy, 298, 117005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Yang, D., Timmermans, H.J.P., & Vries, B. (2020). Analysis of the impact of street-scale built environment design near metro stations on pedestrian and cyclist road segment choice: A stated choice experiment. Journal of Transport Geography, 82, 102570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftness, V., Aziz, A., Choi, J., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K., Atkinson, M., & Heerwagen, J. (2009). The value of post-occupancy evaluation for building occupants and facility managers. Intelligent Buildings International, 1(4), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.3763/inbi.2009.SI04
   Google Scholar
• Mcvicar, A., Munn Giddings, C., & Seebohm, P. (2013). Workplace stress interventions using participatory action research designs. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 6(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538351311312303
   Google Scholar
• Mohandes, M., Deriche, M., Abuelma'atti, M.T. & Tasadduq, N. (2019). Preference-based smart parking system in a university campus. IET Intell. Transp. Syst., 13, 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2018.5207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro Visconti, R., & Morea, D. (2020). Healthcare digitalization and pay-for-performance incentives in smart hospital project financing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag, P. K. (2019). Spatial and behavioural attributes in office design. In Office buildings. Design science and innovation (pp. 29–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2577-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Oseland, N. (2009). The impact of psychological needs on office design. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(4), 3845. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010911006738
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., & Sgroi, D. (2015). Happiness and productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(4), 789–822. https://doi.org/10.1086/681096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijula, J., Gröhn, M., Müller, K., & Reijula, K. (2011). Human well-being and flowing work in an intelligent work environment. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(4), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2011.608837
   Google Scholar
• Rioux, L. (2017). Comfort at work: An indicator of quality of life at work In G. Fleury–Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 401–419). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_22
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, P., Lindholm, A., Hyvönen, A., & Nenonen, S. (2011). User preferences of office occupiers: Investigating the differences. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630011111136803
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, P., Lindholm, A., Hyvönen, A., & Nenonen, S. (2012). Work environment preferences–does age make a difference? Facilities, 30(1/2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771211194284
   Google Scholar
• Salamone, F., Belussi, L., Danza, L., & Meroni, I. (2021). A survey-based approach used to analyse the indoor satisfaction and productivity level of user in smart working during lock-down due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Physics.: Conference. Series, 2042(1), 012139. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/012139
   Google Scholar
• Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., & Wartzack, S. (2017). Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, D., Psychoula, I., Kropf, J., Hanke, S., & Holzinger, A. (2018). Users’ perceptions and attitudes towards smart home technologies. In M. Mokhtari, B. Abdulrazak, & H. Aloulou, (Eds.), Smart Homes and Health Telematics, Designing a Better Future: Urban Assisted Living. ICOST 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10898). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94523-1_18
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & M, P. I. T. T. (2011). Sustainable workplaces and building user comfort and satisfaction. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13(3), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/14630011111170436
   Google Scholar
• Soriano, A., W. Kozusznik, M., Peiró, J. M., & Mateo, C. (2020). The role of employees’ work patterns and office type fit (and misfit) in the relationships between employee well-being and performance. Environment and Behavior, 52(2), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518794260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol M., & Dennick R. (2011). Making sense of cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 27(2), 53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzcuoğlu, D., Yang, D., de Vries, B., Sungur, A., & Appel-Meulenbroek, R. (2021). The phases of user experience during relocation to a smart office building: A qualitative case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuzcuoğlu, D., de Vries, B., Yang, D., & Sungur, A. (2023). What is a smart office environment? An exploratory study from a user perspective. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 25(2), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2021-0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veitch, J. A., Geerts, J., Charles, K.E., & Newsham, G.R. (2005). Satisfaction with lighting in open-plan offices: COPE field findings. In Proceedings of Lux Europa, 10th European Lighting Conference, Berlin, Germany (pp. 414–417).
   Google Scholar
• Veitch, J. A., Charles, K.E., Farley, K.M.J., & Newsham, G.R. (2007). A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vischer, J. C. (2007). The effects of the physical environment on job performance: Towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 23(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijs-Perrée, M., van de Koevering, J., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2019). Analysing user preferences for co-working space characteristics. Building Research & Information, 47(5), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1463750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Nurse, J. R., & Creese, S. (2019). Smartwatch games: Encouraging privacy-protective behaviour in a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., De Vries, B., & Van Der Schaft, L. (2021). The construction workers’ preference and acceptance of innovations in data provision: A stated choice experiment study in The Netherlands. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 101970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar