Design process for an occupant survey system to assess satisfaction with indoor environmental quality

References

• ABNT. (2021). 3o Projeto de Revisão NBR 16401-2 Instalações de ar-condicionado - Sistemas centrais e unitários Parte 2: Parâmetros de conforto térmico
   Google Scholar
• ABNT. (2022). NBR 15666 – Acústica – Avaliação do incômodo sonoro por meio de pesquisas sociais e socioacústicas. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, 25. www.abnt.org.br
   Google Scholar
• Altomonte, S., Allen, J., Bluyssen, P. M., Brager, G., Heschong, L., Loder, A., Schiavon, S., Veitch, J. A., Wang, L., & Wargocki, P. (2020). Ten questions concerning well-being in the built environment. Building and Environment, 180, 106949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARUP. (2020). BUS methodology. https://busmethodology.org.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Bortolini, R., & Forcada, N. (2021). Association between building characteristics and indoor environmental quality through post-occupancy evaluation. Energies, 14(6), 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOSSA System. (2021). BOSSA – ABOUT BOSSA. http://www.bossasystem.com/
   Google Scholar
• Budie, B., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Kemperman, A., & Weijs-Perree, M. (2018). Employee satisfaction with the physical work environment: The importance of a need based approach. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 23(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2019.6372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candido, C., Kim, J., De Dear, R., & Thomas, L. (2016). BOSSA: A multidimensional post-occupancy evaluation tool. Building Research & Information, 44(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1072298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBE. (2020). Occupant indoor environmental quality survey and building benchmarking. https://cbe.berkeley.edu/research/occupant-survey-and-building-benchmarking/
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X. (2023). Contactless sensing of indoor thermal comfort and air quality using computer vision technology. In F. Wang, B. Yang, Q. Deng, & M. Luo (Eds.), Personal comfort systems for improving indoor thermal comfort and air quality (pp. 265–280). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0718-2_13
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, T., Graham, L. T., & Schiavon, S. (2022). Impacts of life satisfaction, job satisfaction and the Big Five personality traits on satisfaction with the indoor environment. Building and Environment, 212, 108783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, T., Schiavon, S., Graham, L. T., & Tham, K. W. (2021). Occupant satisfaction with the indoor environment in seven commercial buildings in Singapore. Building and Environment, 188, 107443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognito LLC. (2022). Cognito forms: Free online form builder. https://www.cognitoforms.com/
   Google Scholar
• Colenberg, S., Jylhä, T., & Arkesteijn, M. (2021). The relationship between interior office space and employee health and well-being – A literature review. Building Research & Information, 49(3), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2019.1710098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, J. (2018). Survey and interview approaches to studying occupants. In A. Wagner, W. O. Brien & B. Dong (Eds.), Exploring occupant behavior in buildings Methods and challenges. (pp. 213–238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61464-9
   Google Scholar
• Day, J. K., & O’Brien, W. (2017). Oh behave! Survey stories and lessons learned from building occupants in high-performance buildings. Energy Research & Social Science, 31, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelen, L., Chau, J., Young, S., Mackey, M., Jeyapalan, D., & Bauman, A. (2019). Is activity-based working impacting health, work performance and perceptions? A systematic review. Building Research & Information, 47(4), 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1440958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN ISO. (2012). EN ISO 28802:2012 – Ergonomics of the physical environment – An environmental survey involving. The European Standardization. Na, 20. https://www.iso.org/standard/44964.html
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, W. J., Black, D., & Brunner, G. (2011). Benefits and costs of improved IEQ in U.S. offices. Indoor Air, 21(5), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00719.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraldi, M. S., & Ghisi, E. (2022). Integrating evidence-based thermal satisfaction in energy benchmarking: A data-driven approach for a whole-building evaluation. Energy, 244(B), 123161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123161
   Google Scholar
• Gnecco, V. M., Geraldi, M. S., Fossati, M., & Triana, M. A. (2022). Comparison between national and local benchmarking models: The case of public nursery schools in Southern Brazil. Sustainable Cities and Society, 78, 103639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göçer, Ö, Candido, C., Thomas, L., & Göçer, K. (2019). Differences in occupants’ satisfaction and perceived productivity in high- and low-performance offices. Buildings, 9(9), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9090199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossauer, E., & Wagner, A. (2007). Post-occupancy evaluation and thermal comfort: State of the art and new approaches. Advances in Building Energy Research, 1(1), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512549.2007.9687273
   Google Scholar
• Graham, L. t., parkinson, T., & schiavon, S. (2021). Lessons learned from 20 years of CBE’s occupant surveys. Buildings and Cities, 2(1), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.76
   Google Scholar
• Groen, B., van der Voordt, T., Hoekstra, B., & van Sprang, H. (2019). Impact of employee satisfaction with facilities on self-assessed productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 17(5), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-12-2018-0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günter, H. (2008). Como elaborar um questionário. In H. Günter & J. de Q. Pinheiro (Eds.), Métodos de pesquisa nos estudos pessoa-ambiente (p. 369). Casa do Psicólogo.
   Google Scholar
• Heinzerling, D., Schiavon, S., Webster, T., & Arens, E. (2013). Indoor environmental quality assessment models: A literature review and a proposed weighting and classification scheme. Building and Environment, 70, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. A. (2005). Quantifying occupant comfort: Are combined indices of the indoor environment practicable? Building Research & Information, 33(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500161950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. (2021). ISO 22955:2021 – Acoustics – Acoustic quality of open office spaces. The European Standardization, 39. https://www.iso.org/standard/74237.html
   Google Scholar
• Jayathissa, P., Quintana, M., Abdelrahman, M., & Miller, C. (2020). Humans-as-a-sensor for buildings—intensive longitudinal indoor comfort models. Buildings, 10(10), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, M., Parkinson, T., Kim, J., & Schiavon, S. (2021). A data-driven analysis of occupant workspace dissatisfaction. Building and Environment, 205, 108270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & de Dear, R. (2012). Nonlinear relationships between individual IEQ factors and overall workspace satisfaction. Building and Environment, 49(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.022
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & de Dear, R. (2013). Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off inopen-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (1999). Productivity in buildings: The ‘killer’ variables. Building Research & Information, 27(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132199369615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2007). Are users more tolerant of ‘green’ buildings? Building Research & Information, 35(6), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701529518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., & Bordass, B. (2010). Building evaluation: Practice and principles. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2010.495217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S., & Guerin, D. A. (2009). Indoor environmental quality related to occupant satisfaction and performance in LEED-certified buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 18(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X09105455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-W., Lee, S.-M., & Lee, S.-E. (2023). Importance of indoor environmental quality surveys for evaluating renovation effects. Journal of Building Engineering, 78, 107726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leesman. (n.d.). Retrieved November 24, 2023, from https://www.leesmanindex.com/
   Google Scholar
• Meir, I. A., Garb, Y., Jiao, D., & Cicelsky, A. (2009). Post-occupancy evaluation: An inevitable step toward sustainability. Advances in Building Energy Research, 3(1), 189–219. https://doi.org/10.3763/aber.2009.0307
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, T., Schiavon, S., Kim, J., & Betti, G. (2023). Common sources of occupant dissatisfaction with workspace environments in 600 office buildings. Buildings and Cities, 4(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.274
   Google Scholar
• Peretti, C., & Schiavon, S. (2011). Indoor environmental quality surveys: A brief literature review. In UC Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0wb1v0ss
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, B., Held, F., Engelen, L., Powell, L., & de Dear, R. (2021). Data fusion in buildings: Synthesis of high-resolution IEQ and occupant tracking data. Science of the Total Environment, 776, 146047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser, W. F. E. (1995). How to make buildings work better. 1996, 13(11), 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Preiser, W. F. E., & Vischer, J. C. (2006). Assessing building performance (W. F. E. Preiser, Ed.) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quevedo, T. C., Geraldi, M. S., & Melo, A. P. (2023). Applying machine learning to develop energy benchmarking for university buildings in Brazil. Journal of Building Engineering, 63(A), 105468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105468
   Google Scholar
• Residovic, C. (2017). The new NABERS Indoor Environment tool – The next frontier for Australian buildings. Procedia Engineering, 180, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.189
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez Leitner, D., Christine Sotsek, N., & de Paula Lacerda Santos, A. (2020). Postoccupancy evaluation in buildings. systematic literature review. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 34(1), 03119002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHE. (2020). SHE post-occupancy evaluation survey – Melbourne school of design. https://msd.unimelb.edu.au/she/research/she-post-occupancy-evaluation-survey
   Google Scholar
• Song, C., & Lee, S. (2022). Accurate non-contact body temperature measurement with thermal camera under varying environment conditions. In 2022 16th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM53663.2022.9721760
   Google Scholar
• USABLE BUILDINGS. (2011). The building use studies (Bus) occupant survey: Origins and approach Q&A. www.gigawiz.com
   Google Scholar
• USGBC. (n.d.). LEED project profiles. Retrieved September 15, 2023, from https://www.usgbc.org/projects?Country=%5B%22Brazil%22%5D
   Google Scholar
• Vischer, J. C. (2008). Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: How people are affected by environments for work. Architectural Science Review, 51(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5114
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Zhang, F., Wang, J., Doyle, J. K., Hancock, P. A., Mak, C. M., & Liu, S. (2021). How indoor environmental quality affects occupants’ cognitive functions: A systematic review. Building and Environment, 193, 107647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WELL. (n.d.). Projects directory. Retrieved November 24, 2023, from https://account.wellcertified.com/directories/projects/
   Google Scholar
• World Green building Council. (2014). Productivity in offices. World Green Building Council, 1, 46.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, J., Parkinson, T., Kim, J., & de Dear, R. (2024). Honeymoon-hangover effect: Occupant workspace satisfaction decreases over time. Indoor Environments, 1(1), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100005
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Cheng, X., Dai, D., Olofsson, T., Li, H., & Meier, A. (2019). Real-time and contactless measurements of thermal discomfort based on human poses for energy efficient control of buildings. Building and Environment, 162, 106284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar