Rethinking impact: understanding the complexity of poverty and change – overview

References

• Adato, Michelle and Ruth Suseela Meinzen-Dick (eds.) (2007) Agricultural Research, Livelihoods and Poverty: Studies of Economic and Social Impacts in Six Countries, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press..
   Google Scholar
• CGIAR Science Council, 2008. Presented at ‘Defining and Refining Good Practice in Ex-post Impact Assessment’, draft unpublished report of the CGIAR Impact Assessment Focal Point (IAFP) Group and Standing Panel for Impact Assessment Meeting, EMBRAPA. Brasilia, Brazil, 10–11, November.
   Google Scholar
• CGIAR Secretariat, 2007. Presented at ‘Investment Proposals and Financing of the 2008 CGIAR Research Agenda’, document presented at the CGIAR Annual General Meeting. Beijing, December.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, William, 2006. Presented at ‘Lessons from Partial Success in Linking Knowledge with Action’, presentation at the workshop ‘Bridging the Gap: Translating Livestock Research Knowledge into Action for Sustainable Development’, ILRI. Nairobi, 16–17, November.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, William, Contreras, Arnoldo, and Harmsen, Karl, 2005. "Evaluation and Impact Assessment of the Alternatives to Slash and Burn Programme. Report of the External Review of the Systemwide Programme on Alternatives to Slash and Burn (ASB)". Rome: Science Council Secretariat, FAO; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, William, Pamela Matson, and Nancy Dickson (organisers) (2008) ‘Linking Knowledge with Action for Sustainable Development’, Arthur M. Sackler Colloquia of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academies of Sciences, Washington, DC, 3–4 April, available at http://www.nasonline.org/SACKLER_sustainable_development (retrieved October 2009)..
   Google Scholar
• EES, 2007. "EES Statement: The Importance of a Methodologically Diverse Approach to Impact Evaluation". Nijkirk, Netherlands: European Evaluation Society Secretariat; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., and Mackay, R., 2003. Learning for the future: innovative approaches to evaluating agricultural research’, special issue, Agricultural Systems 78 (2) (2003), pp. 119–336.
   Google Scholar
• ILAC Initiative, PRGA Program, and ILRI (2008) ‘Rethinking Impact: Understanding the Complexity of Poverty and Change: Key Issues Discussed at the Workshop’, ILAC Working Paper 7; PRGA Program Working Document no. 26; ILRI Innovation Works Discussion Paper no. 4, Rome: Institutional Learning and Change Initiative; Cali, Colombia: CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation; Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute..
   Google Scholar
• Kristjanson, Patti, Lilja, Nina, Watts, Jamie, et al., 2008. , ‘Rethinking Impact: Understanding the Complexity of Poverty and Change – A Pre-Workshop Dialogue. Challenge Paper’, Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute; Cali, Colombia: PRGA Program; Rome: Institutional Learning and Change Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Lilja, Nina, and Dixon, John, 2008a. Impact assessment’, special issue, Experimental Agriculture 44 (1) (2008a), pp. 1–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja, Nina, and Dixon, John, 2008b. Operationalising participatory research and gender analysis, special issue Development in Practice 18 (4&5) (2008b), pp. 467–669.
   Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Dick, R., Adato, M., Haddad, L., and Hazell, P., 2004. "Science and poverty: an interdisciplinary assessment of the impact of agricultural research". In: Food Policy Report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• NONIE (2008) ‘Subgroup 2: NONIE Impact Evaluation Guidance’, available at http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/nonie/docs/NONIE_SG2.pdf (retrieved 24 November 2009)..
   Google Scholar
• Raitzer, D., and Ryan, J. G., 2008. State of the art in impact assessment of policy-oriented international agricultural research’, Evidence & Policy 4 (1) (2008), pp. 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Patricia, 2008a. Presented at ‘Four Key Tasks in Impact Assessment of Complex Interventions’, presentation made at Bioversity International. Rome, September.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Patricia J., 2008b. Using programme theory for complicated and complex programmes, Evaluation 14 (1) (2008b), pp. 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Savedoff, William D., Levine, Ruth, and Birdsall, Nancy, 2006. "When Will We Ever Learn? Improving Lives Through Impact Evaluation". In: Report of the Evaluation Gap Working Group. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, Ian, John Thompson, and Robert Chambers (2008) ‘Farmer First Revisited: Some Reflections on the Future of the CGIAR, An Informal Note to the CGIAR Independent Review Team’, available at http://www.cgiar.org/changemanagement/pdf/farmer_first_revisited.pdf (retrieved 23 October 2009)..
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E., 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Tomich, Thomas P., Dagmar W. Timmer, Sandra J. Velarde, Julio Alegre, Veronika Areskoug, David W. Cash, Andrea Cattaneo, Polly Ericksen, Laxman Joshi, Joyce Kasyoki, Christopher Legg, Marilia Locatelli, Daniel Mardiyarso, Cheryl Palm, Roberto Porro, Alejandro Rescia Perazzo, Angel Salazar-Vega, Meine van Noordwijk, Stephen Weise, and Douglas White (2007) ‘Integrative science in practice: process perspectives from ASB, the Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121: 269–86..
   Google Scholar
• Walker, T., Maredia, M., Kelley, T., La Rovere, R., Templeton, D., Thiele, G., and Douthwaite, B., 2008. "Strategic Guidance for Ex Post Impact Assessment of Agricultural Research’, report prepared for the Standing Panel on Impact Assessment, CGIAR Science Council". Rome: CGIAR Science Council Secretariat; 2008.
   Google Scholar