Who wins? Lessons on the use of innovation prizes to achieve social change for the benefit of the very poorest

References

• Ballantyne, P. 2014. Challenge Prizes: A Practice Guide. Nesta, UK: Centre for Challenge Prizes.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, M. 2010. The Total Economic Impact of InnoCentive’s Enterprise Solution: Challenges. InnoCentive@Work and ONRAMP Single-Company Case Study, Forrester Consulting, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. 2017. LPG Cylinder Prize Evaluation Report, July 2017, Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. 2020. 2016-17 Global Leap Off-Grid Refrigerator Competition (Round 1): Follow-Up Review. Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., C. Gould, and C. Stott. 2020. Rising to the Challenge: How to Get the Best Value from Using Prizes to Drive Innovation for Development. Ideas to Impact Research Report, Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Brunt, L., J. Lerner, and T. Nicholas. 2008. Inducement Prizes and Innovation. Discussion Paper, Number 6917. London, UK: Center for Economic Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, M. J., and F. E. Murray. 2015. Innovation prizes in practice and theory. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 29, Harvard Law School, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, S. 2015. Stimulating Solutions to Energy Access Through the use of Innovation Prizes. Report for Ideas to Impact. Redhill: GVEP International in association with IMC Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, A., T. Narayan, J. Geyer, J. Bell, and Luciano Kay. 2017. A Framework for Evaluating Innovation Challenges. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Everett, B., C. Barnett, and R. Verma. 2011. Evidence Review: Environmental Innovation Prizes for Development. DFID Resource Centre for Environment, Water and Sanitation, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gök, A. 2013. The Impact of Innovation Inducement Prizes. Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention, University of Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, C., and C. Brown. 2019. The Dreampipe Challenge II: Final Evaluation Report. November 2019, Ideas to Impact, Itad in associations with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, C., and C. Brown. 2020. The Sanitation Challenge for Ghana: Dignified City Award (Stage 2). Final Evaluation Report, May 2020, Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey and Company. 2009. And the Winner Is … Capturing the Promise of Philanthropic Prizes. Sydney: McKinsey and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., C. Brown, and C. Stott. 2019. Using Innovation Inducement Prizes for Development: What More Has Been Learned? Discussion paper, Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C. 2020. Adaptation at Scale: Final Evaluation Report. January 2020, Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C., and C. Brown. 2019. The Climate Information Prize: Tekeleza (Stage 2) Final Evaluation Report. August 2019, Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C., and C. Brown. 2020. The Climate Information Prize: What Happened Next? Final Report, January 2020, Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, C., and C. Gould. Forthcoming. Evaluating the Value for Money of Ideas to Impact’s Innovation Inducement Prizes: Final Report, Ideas to Impact, Itad in association with IMC Worldwide, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J., and C. Dixon. 2015. Innovation Prizes: A Guide for Use in a Developing Country Context. Ideas to Impact. Waterlines 36 (3), Practical Action Publishing, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, H. 2012. “Innovation Inducement Prizes: Connecting Research to Policy.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 31 (3): 752–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar