https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5086-7989
References
- 5GAA. (2019). Safety Treatment in Connected and Autonomous Driving Functions Report. 5GAA Automotive Association Technical Report.
- Agirre, I., Cazorla, F. J., Abella, J., Hernandez, C., Mezzetti, E., Azkarate-Askatsua, M., & Vardanega, T. (2018). Fitting software execution-time exceedance into a residual random fault in ISO-26262. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 67(3), 1314–1327. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2018.2828222
- ARC. (2022). International Engineering Safety Management (IESM) Good Practice Handbook, Volume 2, Issue 1.4: Methods, Tools and Techniques for Projects. Abbot Risk Consulting Ltd. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/60e5bc3a5cbea5566b74ada9/t/627093c0ef8e2040b9a3def8/1651545038338/iESM_Volume_2_Issue_1.4.pdf
- ARC. (2022a). International Engineering Safety Management (IESM) Good Practice Handbook, Application Note 9, Issue 1.2: Safety Integrity Within Engineering Safety Management. Abbot Risk Consulting Ltd. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/60e5bc3a5cbea5566b74ada9/t/62709965fa5f667208d2a3c2/1651546475902/iESM_AN9_Issue_1.2.pdf
- Braband, J., Vom Hovel, R., & Schabe, H. (2009). Probability of failure on demand – The why and the how. In B. Buth, G. Rabe, & T. Seyfarth (Eds.), 26th International Conference, SAFECOMP, 2009 (pp. 46–54). Springer.
- Divaklar, K. P. (2017). ISO26262 and IEC61508 Functional Safety Overview. AMF-AUT-T2713. Retrieved from https://community.nxp.com/pwmxy87654/attachments/pwmxy87654/tech-days/160/1/AMF-AUT-T2713.pdf
- Efody, A. (2023). Getting ISO 26262 Faults Straight. Siemens. Retrieved from https://verificationacademy.com/topics/functional-safety/articles/Getting-ISO-26262-faults-straight
- EN 50126. (2017). Railway Applications - The Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC).
- EN 50128. (2020). Railway applications - Communication, signalling and processing systems - Software for railway control and protection systems. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC).
- EN 50129. (2018). Railway applications - Communication, signalling and processing systems - Safety related electronic systems for signalling. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC).
- Exida. (2023). Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL). Retrieved from https://www.exida.com/Resources/Term/Automotive-Safety-Integrity-Level-ASIL
- Frigerio, A. (2022). Functional-safety analysis of ASIL decomposition for redundant automotive systems [PhD thesis 1 (Research TU/e/Graduation TU/e), Electrical Engineering]. Eindhoven University of Technology.
- IEC 61508. (2010). Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-related Systems.
- ISO 26262. (2018). Road vehicles – Functional safety.
- Khastgir, S. (2022). Cross domain safety assurance framework for automated transport systems. Retrieved from https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/wmg/research/research-areas/verification-and validation/ukriflf/cross_domain_safety_assurance_framework_for_automated_systems.pdf
- Marcus, F., & Mieslinger, J. (2012). Embedded processing marketing MCU industrial & automotive. In Functional Safety Seminar & 1-Day HerculesTM Workshop. Arrow Roadshow Silkeborg.
- Mariajoseph, M., Gallina, B., Carli, M., & Bibbo, D. (2020). A physiology-based driver readiness estimation model for tuning ISO 26262 controllability. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC2020-Spring48590.2020.9129132
- Meany, T. (2019). Automotive vs industrial functional safety. ADI engineer Zone. Retrieved from https://ez.analog.com/ez-blogs/b/engineerzone-spotlight/posts/automotive-vs-industrial-functional-safety
- Military Aerospace Electronics. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.militaryaerospace.com/computers/article/16714656/what-is-safetycertifiable-avionics-hardware-that-meets-design-assurance-levels-dal
- Munir, A. (2017). Safety assessment and design of dependable cybercars: For today and the future. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 6(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2640738
- Okoh, P. (2023). The application of inherent safety to functional safety. Safety and Reliability, 42(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2023.2263727
- Okoh, P., Dong, H. S., & Liu, Y. (2022). Cross-acceptance of fire safety systems based on SIL equivalence in relation to IEC 61508 and EN 50129. Safety and Reliability, 41(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2022.2107255
- Okoh, P., & Haugen, S. (2013). Maintenance-related major accidents: Classification of causes and case study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(6), 1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.04.002
- Okoh, P., & Haugen, S. (2014). Application of inherent safety to maintenance-related major accident prevention on offshore installations. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 36, 175–180.
- Rausand, M. (2011). Risk assessment: Theory, methods, and applications (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
- Rausand, M. (2014). Reliability of safety-critical systems: Theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
- SAE J3016. (2012). Recommended practice: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Verhulst, E., Vara, J., Sputh, B., & Florio, V. (2013). ARRL: A criterion for composable safety and systems engineering.
- Weits, E., Munck, S., & Eigenraam, A. (2019). Deriving THR and SIL from National Safety Targets, accounting for scale and exposure. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Railway Symposium Aachen 2019. Retrieved from https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/775096/files/775096.pdf