Extending sociological theorising on high ability: the significance of values and lived experience

References

• Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. The John Dewey lecture series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2004). Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: Towards the performative society. In S. Ball (Ed.), The Routledge Falmer reader in sociology of education (pp. 143–155). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Bamfield, L., & Horton, T. (2010). What’s fair? Applying the fairness test to education. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational transmissions (Vol. 3). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.10.4324/9780203011430
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Borland, J. H. (1997). The construct of giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 6–20.10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681863
   Google Scholar
• Borland, J. H. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610455
   Google Scholar
• Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (2004). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Identification of students for gifted and talented programs (Vol. 2, 25–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brighouse, H. (2010). Educational equality and school reform. In G. Haydon (Ed.), Educational equality: Harry Brighouse, Kenneth R. Howe and James Tooley (pp. 15–70). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. J., Muijs, R. D., Neelands, J. G. A., Robinson, W., Eyre, D., & Hewston, R. (2007). The social origins of students identified as gifted and talented in England: A geo‐demographic analysis. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 103–120.10.1080/03054980601119664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, D. (2013). Some thoughts on education and political priorities. Retrieved from http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/804396/some-thoughts-on-education-and-political.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review. Nottingham: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (1999). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, D. (2011). Room at the top: Inclusive education for high performance. London: Policy Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, L., Duckworth, K., & Sabates, R. (2008). Education and the family: Passing success across the generations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (1998). Educating the very able: Current international research. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. A. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Katsipataki, M., Kokotsaki, D., Coleman, R., Major, L. E., & Coe, R. (2013). The sutton trust-education endowment foundation teaching and learning toolkit. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hymer, B. (2009). Gifted & talented pocketbook. Alresford: Teachers’ Pocketbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, P. (1997). Postmodern welfare: Reconstructing an emancipatory project. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lignier, W. (2012). La petite noblesse de l’intelligence: une sociologie des enfants surdoués [ The Little Nobility of Intelligence – A Sociology of Gifted Children]. Paris: Éditions La Découvete.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., & Claxton, G. (2010). New kinds of smart: How the science of learnable intelligence is changing education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (2001). Creating a dialogue between sociological and egalitarian theory in education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11, 237–260.10.1080/09620210100200077
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, L. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoli Smith, L. (2014). Giftedness and globalisation: The challenge of cultural diversity for gifted education programmes in a neoliberal educational marketplace. Gifted Education International, 30, 197–211.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoli Smith, L., & Campbell, R. J. (2012). Families, Education and Giftedness. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6091-991-6
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. D., John, E. P. S., Jalava, M., Kroth, A. J., & Somers, P. (2013). Fairness in access to higher education in a global perspective: Reconciling excellence, efficiency and justice. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-230-3
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (1999). Bourdieu, ‘habitus’, and educational research: Is it all worth the candle? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 176–187.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (2001). Class, ‘ability’ and attainment: A problem for the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22, 189–202.10.1080/01425690120054821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, R. (2002). Numbers and narratives: Further reflections in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23, 397–412.10.1080/0142569022000015436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21, 147–161.10.1080/02680930500500138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestly, M., & Biesta, G. (2012). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, H., Koshy, V., & Taylor, A. (2007). Gifts, talents and meritocracy. Journal of Educational Policy, 22, 283–299.10.1080/02680930701269186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, G., Power, S., & Taylor, C. (2007). The governance of educational inequalities: The limits of area-based initiatives. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 9, 261–274.10.1080/13876980701494665
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488863
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, S. (2005). The gifted: Identity construction through the practice of gifted education. International Education Journal, 5, 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. (2003). Respect: The formation of character in an age of inequality. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Shenk, D. (2011). The genius in all of us: Why everything you’ve been told about genetics, talent, and IQ is wrong. London: Icon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (2007). Personal life: New directions in sociological thinking. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• The Childcare Act. (2006). It is an act of parliament. London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• The Global Sociology Blog. (2012). Review of Wilfred Lignier’s The little nobility of intelligence – A sociology of gifted children. Retrieved from http://globalsociology.com/2012/08/25/book-review-a-sociology-of-gifted-children/
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., Casey, R., & Koshy, V. (1996, April). The education of able and exceptionally able children in England and Wales. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. (2006). Intelligence, destiny and education: The ideological roots of intelligence testing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winstanley, C. (2004). Too clever by half: A fair deal for gifted children. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. (1998). Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27, 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar