865
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Intersectionality and reflexivity in gender research: disruptions, tracing lines and shooting arrows

Pages 169-182 | Received 21 Jun 2014, Accepted 02 Jun 2015, Published online: 30 Jun 2015

References

  • Blackmore, J. (2010). ‘The other within’: Race/gender disruptions to the professional learning of white educational leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13, 45–61. doi:10.1080/13603120903242931
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Callaway, H. (1992). Anthopology and autobiograpy: Participatory experience and embodied knowledge. In J. Okely & H. Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and autobiography (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203450536
  • Collins, P. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13, 62–82.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x
  • Collins, S. (2008). The hunger games. New York, NY: Scholastic Press.
  • Connell, R. (2012). Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1675–1683. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.006
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991a). Demarginalizing the interscetion of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. In K. T. Bartlett & R. Kennedy (Eds.), Feminist legal theory: Readings in law and gender (pp. 57–80). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991b). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.10.2307/1229039
  • Davies, C. A. (1999). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67–85.10.1177/1464700108086364
  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • England, K. V. L. (1994). Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer, 46, 80–89.10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x
  • Human Rights Commission. (2012). New Zealand census of women’s participation. Retrieved from http://www.hrc.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/web-census.pdf
  • Ingraham, C. (1994). The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender. Sociological Theory, 12, 203–219.10.2307/201865
  • Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. New York, NY : Routledge.
  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 30, 1771–1800.10.1086/signs.2005.30.issue-3
  • Nietzsche, F. (1969). Thus spoke zarathustra. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Okely, J., & Callaway, H. (Eds.). (1992). Anthropology and autobiography. London: Routledge.
  • Søndergaard, D. M. (2001). Consensual and disensual university cultures: Gender and power in academia. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 9, 143–153. doi:10.1080/713801036
  • Søndergaard, D. M. (2005a). Academic desire trajectories: Retooling the concepts of subject, desire and biography. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12, 297–313. doi:10.1177/1350506805054270
  • Søndergaard, D. M. (2005b). Making sense of gender, age, power and disciplinary position: Intersecting discourses in the academy. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 189–208.
  • Ståhle, B. (2013). Videnskabeligt personale på universiteterne 2013 [Academic staff at universities 2013]. Styrelsen for Videregående Uddannelser Statistik og Analyse [Agency for higher education statistics and analysis]. Retrieved from http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/forskere-ved-universiteterne/videnskabeligt-personale-pa-universiteterne-2013-statistiknotat-1.pdf
  • Staunæs, D. (2003). Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 11, 101–110.10.1080/08038740310002950
  • Staunæs, D., & Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Intersectionality: A theoretical adjustment. In R. Buikema, G. Griffin, & N. Lykke (Eds.), Theories and methodologies in postgraduate feminist research (pp. 45–59). London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.