References
- Allison, H. E. (1987). Benedict de Spinoza: An introduction. Yale University Press.
- Angelou, M. (1971). 92 Y interview with Maya Angelou: Mystical, magical, and lyrical. New York: Penguin. www.92y.org.
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
- Barad, K. (2013). Ma(r)king time: Material entanglements and re-memberings: Cutting together- apart. In P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), How matter matters: Objects, artifacts, and materiality in organization studies (pp. 16–31). Oxford University Press.
- Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Bodén, L. (2021, online first). On, to, with, for, by: Ethics and children in research. Children’s Geographies. Routledge. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.1891405
- Boldt, G. (2020). Theorizing vitality in the literacy classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 207-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.307
- Burawoy, M. (2003). Revisits: An outline of a theory of reflexive ethnography. American Sociological Review, 68(5), 645–679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1519757
- Deleuze, G. (1966/1988). Le Bergsonisme (Paris: PUF);, trans. as Bergsonism, by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. Zone Books.
- Dernikos, B. (2019). A gender gap in literacy? Exploring the affective im/materiality and “Magic” of Allure with/in a first grade classroom. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 3(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.3682
- Gilbert, E. (2015). Big magic: Creative living beyond fear. Riverhead Books.
- Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.
- Grosz, E. (2017). The incorporeal: Ontology, ethics, and the limits of materialism. Columbia University Press.
- Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Duke University Press.
- Keating, A. L. (2013). Transformation now!: Toward a post-oppositional politics of change. University of Illinois Press.
- Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. Routledge Press.
- Kuby, C. R. (2017). Poststructural and posthumanist theories as research methodologies: Tensions and possibilities. In R. Zaidi & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Literacy lives in transcultural times (pp. 157–174). Routledge.
- Kuby, C. R. (2019). (Re)imagining multiliteracies research practices with post qualitative inquiry. In N. Kucirkova, J. Rowsell, & G. Fallon (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of learning with technology in early childhood (pp. 127–142). Routledge.
- Kuby, C. R., & Gutshall Rucker, T. (2016). Go be a writer!: Expanding the curricular boundaries of literacy learning with children. Teachers College Press.
- Kuby, C. R., & Gutshall Rucker, T. (2020). (Re)Thinking children as fully (in)human and literacies as otherwise through (re)etymologizing intervene and inequality. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(1), 13–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798420904774
- Lather, P. & St. Pierre, E. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633
- MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation?: Language and materiality in post- qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788755
- MacLure, M. (2020). Inquiry as divination. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1077800420939124
- Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the sensible: Movement, affect, sensation. Duke University Press.
- Mazzei, L. A. (2014). Beyond an easy sense: A diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 742–746. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530257
- Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2010). Artifactual literacies: Every object tells a story. Teachers College Press.
- Pahl, K., Rowsell, J., Collier, D., Pool, S., Rasool, Z., & Trzecak, T. (2020). Living literacies. MIT Press.
- Rowsell, J. (2020). “How emotional do I make it?”: Making a stance in multimodal compositions. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(6), 627–637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1034
- Sefton-Green, J., & Rowsell, J. (Eds.). (2014). Learning and literacy over time: Longitudinal perspectives. Routledge.
- Smith, D., & Protevi, J. (2018). Gilles Deleuze. Stanford University. Retrieved October 9, 2020, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/deleuze/#Dif
- Snaza, N. (2019). Animate literacies: Literature, affect, and the politics of humanism. Duke University Press.
- Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2018). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (In)tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 611–635). Sage.
- Stewart, K. (2010). Afterword: Worlding refrains. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 339–354). Duke University Press.
- Tolkien, J. R. R. (1954). The fellowship of the ring. Allen & Unwin.
- Truman, S. (2021). Feminist speculations and the practice of research-creation: Writing pedagogies and intertextual affects. Routledge.
- Winnicott, D. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena: A study of the first no-me possession. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34(2), 89–97.
- Zapata, A., Kuby, C. R., & Thiel, J. J. (2018). Encounters with writing: Becoming-with posthumanist ethics. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(4), 478–501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X18803707