Processing effects on susceptibility of starch to digestion in some dietary starch sources

References

• Bjorck I, Grandfelt Y, Liljeberg H, Tovar J & Asp NG (1994): Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates. Am J. Clin. Nutr. 59(3 Suppl.), 699S -705S.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo L, Siddhuraju P & Saura-Calixto F (1998): Effect of various processing methods on the in vitro starch digest- ibility and resistant starch content of Indian pulses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 4667–4674.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung PCK & Chau C (1998): Changes in dietary fiber (resistant starch and non-starch polysaccharides) content of cooked flours prepared from three Chinese indigenous legume seeds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher ML, Dreher CJ & Berry JW (1984): Starch digest- ibility of foods: a nutritional perspective. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 20(1), 47–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggum BO, Juliano BO, Perez CM & Acedo EF (1993): The resistant starch, undigestible energy and undigestible protein contents of raw and cooked milled rice. J. Cereal Sci. 18, 159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englyst HN, Kingman SM & Cummings JH (1992): Classification and measurement of nutritionally impor- tant starch fractions. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 46(Suppl. 2), S33 - S50.
   Google Scholar
• Englyst KN, Englyst HN, Hudson GJ, Cole TJ & Cummings JH (1999): Rapidly available glucose in foods: an in vitro measurement that reflects glycemic response. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69, 448–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escarpa A, Gonzalez MC, Manas E, Garcia-Diz L & Saura- Calixto F (1998): Resistant starch formation: standardi- zation of a high pressure autoclave process. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44, 924–926.
   Google Scholar
• Grindley PB, Omoruyi FO, Asemota HN, Morrison EY & St. A (2001): Effect of yam (Dioscorea cayenensis) and dasheen (Colocassia esculenta) on extracts of the kidney of streptozocin-induced diabetes rats. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 52, 429–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover R (2001): Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches: a review. Carb. Polym. 45, 253–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihekeronye AI & Ngoddy PO (1985): Integrated Food Science and Technology for the Tropics, pp. 266–270. Hong Kong: Macmillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson PNT & Brennan JG (2000): Moisture sorption isotherm characteristics of plantain (Musa, AAB). J. Food Eng. 44, 79–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez HW, Levrat-Werny M, Coudray C, Besson C, Krespine V, Messager A, Demigne C & Remesy C (2001): Class 2 resistant starches lower plasma and liver lipid levels and improve mineral retention in rats. J. Nutr. 131, 1283–1289.
   Google Scholar
• Marconi E, Ruggeri S, Capelloni M, Leonardi D & Carnovale E (2000): Physicochemical, nutritional and microstructural characteristics of chickpeas (Cicer arieti- num L.) and common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) following microwave cooking. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48, 5986–5994.
   Google Scholar
• Marsono Y & Topping DL (1993): Complex carbohydrates in Australian rice products * influence of microwave cooking and food processing. Lebens.-Wiss. Technol. 26, 364–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noah L, Guillon F, Bouchet B, Buleon A, Molis C, Gratas M & Champ M (1998): Digestion of carbohydrate from white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in healthy humans. J. Nutr. 128, 977–985.
   Google Scholar
• Ranhotra GS, Gelroth JA & Leinen SD (1999): Resistant starch in selected grain-based foods. Cereal Foods World. 44(5), 357–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Periago MJ, Englyst HN & Hudson GJ (1996): The influence of thermal processing on the non-starch poly- saccharide (NSP) content and in vitro digestibility of starch in peas (Pisum sativum L.). Lebens.-Wiss. Technol. 29, 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagum R & Arcot J (2000): Effect of domestic processing methods on the starch, non-starch polysaccharides and in vitro starch and protein digestibility of three varieties of rice with varying levels of amylose. Food Chem. 70, 107–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrabanja V & Kreft I (1998): Resistant starch formation following autoclaving of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculen- tum Moench) groats. An in vitro study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46, 2020–2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrabanja V, Liljeberg HGM, Hedley CL, Kreft I & Bjork IME (1999): Influence of genotype and processing on the in vitro rate of starch hydrolysis and resistant starch formation in peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 2033–2039.
   Google Scholar
• Skrede G, Sahlstrom S, Skrede A, Holck A & Slinde E (2001): Effect of lactic acid soaking of wheat and barley whole meal flour on carbohydrate composition and digestibility in mink (Mustela vison). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 90, 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson DB (2000): Strategies for the manufacture of resistant starch. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 11, 245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping DL & Clifton PM (2001): Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and non-starch polysaccharides. Phys. Rev. 81 (3),1031 -1064. Tovar J & Melito C (1996): Steam-cooking and dry heating produce resistant starch in legumes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44(9), 2642–2645.
   Google Scholar
• van der Merwe B, Erasmus C & Taylor JRN (2001): African maize porridge: a food with slow in vitro starch digest- ibility. Food Chem. 21, 347–353.
   Google Scholar
• Voragen AGJ (1998): Technological aspects of functional food related carbohydrates. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 9, 328 - 335. Weurding RE, Veldman A, Veen WAG, van der Aar P & Verstegen MWA (2001): In vitro starch digestion corre- lates well with rate and extent of starch digestion in broiler chickens. J. Nutr. 131, 2336–2342.
   Google Scholar