The influence of different cooking treatments on vegetables’ bolus properties

References

• Capuano E, Pellegrini N. 2019. An integrated look at the effect of structure on nutrient bioavailability in plant foods. J Sci Food Agric. 99(2):493–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J. 2009. Food oral processing—a review. Food Hydrocoll. 23(1):1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiavaro E, Barbanti D, Vittadini E, Massini R. 2006. The effect of different cooking methods on the instrumental quality of potatoes (cv. Agata). J Food Eng. 77(1):169–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lavergne MD, van de Velde F, Stieger M. 2017. Bolus matters: the influence of food oral breakdown on dynamic texture perception. Food Funct. 8(2):464–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wijk RA, Prinz JF, Engelen L, Weenen H. 2004. The role of α-amylase in the perception of oral texture and flavour in custards. Physiol Behav. 83(1):81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djekic I, Ilic J, Lorenzo JM, Tomasevic I. 2021. How do culinary methods affect quality and oral processing characteristics of pork ham? J Texture Stud. 52(1):36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donadini G, Fumi MD, Porretta S. 2012. Influence of preparation method on the hedonic response of preschoolers to raw, boiled or oven-baked vegetables. LWT Food Sci Technol. 49(2):282–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forde CG, Van Kuijk N, Thaler T, De Graaf C, Martin N. 2013. Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation. Appetite. 60(1):208–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Funami T. 2017. In vivo and rheological approaches for characterizing food oral processing and usefulness of polysaccharides as texture modifiers—a review. Food Hydrocoll. 68:2–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilic J, Tomasevic I, Djekic I. 2021a. Influence of boiling, steaming, and sous-vide on oral processing parameters of celeriac (Apium graveolens var. rapaceum). Int J Gastron Food Sci. 23:100308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilic J, Tomasevic I, Djekic I. 2021b. Influence of water-based and contact heating preparation methods on potato mechanical properties, mastication, and sensory perception. Int J Gastron Food Sci. 25:100401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilic J, Tomasevic I, Djekic I. 2021c. Purple eggplant and zucchini color, mechanical properties, mastication, and sensory perception influenced by boiling and grilling. J Texture Stud. 1(11):174–184.
   Google Scholar
• Ilic J, Tomasevic I, Djekic I. 2021d. Ease of mastication index – quantification of mastication effort using quality function deployment. J Texture Stud. 52(4):447–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilic J, Tomasevic I, Djekic I. 2022. Purple eggplant and zucchini color, mechanical properties, mastication, and sensory perception influenced by steaming and sous-vide. Int J Gastron Food Sci. 28:100549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 1997. Meat and meat products – determination of moisture content. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Jalabert-Malbos M-L, Mishellany-Dutour A, Woda A, Peyron M-A. 2007. Particle size distribution in the food bolus after mastication of natural foods. Food Qual Pref. 18(5):803–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joubert M, Septier C, Brignot H, Salles C, Panouillé M, Feron G, Tournier C. 2017. Chewing bread: impact on alpha-amylase secretion and oral digestion. Food Funct. 8(2):607–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketel EC, Aguayo-Mendoza MG, de Wijk RA, de Graaf C, Piqueras-Fiszman B, Stieger M. 2019. Age, gender, ethnicity and eating capability influence oral processing behaviour of liquid, semi-solid and solid foods differently. Food Res Int. 119:143–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koç H, Vinyard CJ, Essick GK, Foegeding EA. 2013. Food oral processing: conversion of food structure to textural perception. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 4(1):237–266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lassauzay C, Peyron M, Albuisson E, Dransfield E, Woda A. 2000. Variability of the masticatory process during chewing of elastic model foods. Eur J Oral Sci. 108(6):484–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillford PJ. 2000. The materials science of eating and food breakdown. MRS Bull. 25(12):38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillford PJ. 2011. The importance of food microstructure in fracture physics and texture perception. J Texture Stud. 42(2):130–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panouillé M, Saint-Eve A, Déléris I, Le Bleis F, Souchon I. 2014. Oral processing and bolus properties drive the dynamics of salty and texture perceptions of bread. Food Res Int. 62:238–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poelman AAM, Delahunty CM, de Graaf C. 2017. Vegetables and other core food groups: a comparison of key flavour and texture properties. Food Qual Prefer. 56:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizo A, Peña E, Alarcon-Rojo AD, Fiszman S, Tárrega A. 2019. Relating texture perception of cooked ham to the bolus evolution in the mouth. Food Res Int. 118:4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salles C, Chagnon M-C, Feron G, Guichard E, Laboure H, Morzel M, Semon E, Tarrega A, Yven C. 2010. In-mouth mechanisms leading to flavor release and perception. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 51(1):67–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes JR, Boehm MW, Baier SK. 2013. Oral processing, texture and mouthfeel: from rheology to tribology and beyond. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 18(4):349–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasevic I, Tomovic V, Milovanovic B, Lorenzo J, Đorđević V, Karabasil N, Djekic I. 2019. Comparison of a computer vision system vs. traditional colorimeter for color evaluation of meat products with various physical properties. Meat Sci. 148:5–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2022. Using the nutrition facts label and MyPlate to make healthier choices [online]. https://www.fda.gov/food/new-nutrition-facts-label/using-nutrition-facts-label-and-myplate-make-healthier-choices.
   Google Scholar
• van Eck A, Fogliano V, Galindo-Cuspinera V, Scholten E, Stieger M. 2019. Adding condiments to foods: how does static and dynamic sensory perception change when bread and carrots are consumed with mayonnaise? Food Qual Prefer. 73:154–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe-Descamps M, Sulmont-Rossé C, Septier C, Feron G, Labouré H. 2017. Using food comfortability to compare food’s sensory characteristics expectations of elderly people with or without oral health problems. J Texture Stud. 48(4):280–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Chen J. 2017. Food oral processing: recent developments and challenges. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 28:22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar