1,650
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Business Involvement in Accounting: A Case Study of International Financial Reporting Standards Adoption and the Work of Accountants

Pages 335-356 | Received 01 May 2012, Accepted 01 May 2013, Published online: 09 Oct 2013

References

  • d'Arcy, A. (2001) Accounting classification and international harmonization debate – an empirical investigation, Accounting Organization and Society, 26(4–5), pp. 327–349. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00036-2
  • Bechky, B. (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor, Organization Science, 14(3), pp. 312–330. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
  • Bennett, B., Bradbury, M. and Prangnell, H. (2006) Rules, principles and judgments in accounting standards, Abacus, 42(2), pp. 189–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00197.x
  • Benston, G., Bromwich, M. and Wagenhofer, A. (2006) Principles- versus rules-based accounting standards: the FASB's standard setting strategy, Abacus, 42(2), pp. 165–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00196.x
  • Briers, M. and Chua, W. F. (2001) The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(3), pp. 237–269. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00029-5
  • Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation, Organization Science, 2(1), pp. 102–111. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
  • Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1998) Organizing knowledge, California Management Review, 40(3), pp. 90–111. doi: 10.2307/41165945
  • Burns, J. and Baldvinsdottir, G. (2005) An institutional perspective of accountants’ new roles – the interplay of contradictions and praxis, European Accounting Review, 14(4), pp. 725–757. doi: 10.1080/09638180500194171
  • Byrne, S. and Pierce, B. (2007) Towards more comprehensive understanding of the roles of management accountants, European Accounting Review, 16(3), pp. 469–498. doi: 10.1080/09638180701507114
  • Carlile, P. R. (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development, Organization Science, 13(4), pp. 442–455. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
  • Carmona, S. and Trombetta, M. (2008) On the global acceptance of IAS/IFRS accounting standards: the logic and implications of the principles-based system, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(6), pp. 455–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.003
  • Chua, W. F. (1995) Experts, networks and inscriptions in the fabrication of accounting images: a story of the representation of three public hospitals, Accounting, Organization and Society, 20(2/3), pp. 111–145. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(95)95744-H
  • CIMA (2008) , The financial reporting supply chain, Executive report. Available at http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/ImportedDocuments/cid_execrep_the_financial_reporting_supply_chain_may08.pdf
  • CIMA (2009) , Complexity, relevance and clarity of corporate reporting: the views of CIMA FTSE 350. Available at http://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/Imported Documents/cid_techrep_complexity_ relevance_and_clarity_of_corporate_reporting_feb09.pdf
  • Cooper, D. J. and Morgan, W. (2008) Case study research in accounting, Accounting Horizons, 22(2), pp. 159–178. doi: 10.2308/acch.2008.22.2.159
  • Ding, Y., Hope, O.-K., Jeanjean, T. and Stolowy, H. (2006) Differences between domestic accounting standards and IAS: measurement, determinants and implications, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(1), pp. 1–38.
  • Friedman, A. L., Lyne, S. R. (1997) Activity-based techniques and the death of the beancounter, The European Accounting Review, 6(1), pp. 19–44. doi: 10.1080/096381897336854
  • Goretzki, L., Strauss, E. and Weber, J. (2013) An institutional perspective on the changes in management accountants’ professional role, Management Accounting Research, 24(1), pp. 41–63. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.11.002
  • Granlund, M. and Lukka, K. (1997) From Bean-counters to change agents: The Finnish management accounting culture in transition, The Finnish Journal of Business Economics,3/1997 pp. 213–255.
  • Granlund, M. and Lukka, K. (1998) Towards increasing business orientation: Finnish management accountants in a changing cultural context, Management Accounting Research, 9(2), pp. 185–211. doi: 10.1006/mare.1998.0076
  • Hines, R. (1988) Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13(3), pp. 251–261. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(88)90003-7
  • Hopper, T. M. (1980) Role conflicts of management accountants and their position within organisation structures, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), pp. 401–411. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(80)90039-2
  • Humphrey, C. and Scapens, R. W. (1996) Methodological themes – theories and case studies of organizational accounting practices: limitation or liberation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(4), pp. 86–106. doi: 10.1108/09513579610129435
  • Järvenpää, M. (2002) Johdon laskentatoimen liiketoimintaan suuntautuminen laskentakulttuurisena muutoksena – vertaileva case-tutkimus [Summary: Business orientation of management accounting as a cultural change – a comparative case study], Series A-5. Publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Turku.
  • Järvenpää, M. (2007) Making business partners: a case study on how management accounting culture was changed, European Accounting Review, 16(1), pp. 99–142. doi: 10.1080/09638180701265903
  • Jermakowicz, E. K. and Gornik-Tomaszewski, S. (2006) Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EU publicly traded companies, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), pp. 170–196. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.003
  • Lambert, C. and Sponem, S. (2012) Roles, authority and involvement of the management accounting function: a multiple case-study perspective, European Accounting Review, 21(3), pp. 565–589.
  • Lantto, A.-M. and Sahlström, P. (2009) Impact of international financial reporting standard adoption on key financial ratios, Accounting and Finance, 49(2), pp. 341–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2008.00283.x
  • Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (New York: Cambridge University Press).
  • Maas, V. S. and Matějka, M. (2009) Balancing the dual responsibilities of business unit controllers: field and survey evidence, The Accounting Review, 84(4), pp. 1233–1253. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.4.1233
  • Malmi, T., Seppälä, T. and Rantanen, M. (2001) The practice of management accounting in Finland – a change?, The Finnish Journal of Business Economics,4/2001 pp. 480–501.
  • Mouritsen, J. (1996) Five aspects of accounting departments’ work, Management Accounting Research, 7(3), pp. 283–303. doi: 10.1006/mare.1996.0017
  • Nelson, M. W. (2003) Behavioral evidence on the effects of principles- and rules-based standards, Accounting Horizons, 17(1), pp. 91–104. doi: 10.2308/acch.2003.17.1.91
  • Nobes, C. (1998) Towards a general model of the reasons for the international differences in financial reporting, Abacus, 34(2), pp. 162–187. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00028
  • Pawlowski, S. and Robey, D. (2004) Bridging user organizations: knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals, MIS Quarterly, 28(4), pp. 645–672.
  • Pirinen, P. (2005) Economic and normative pressures as drivers for the adoption of international accounting standards in Finland since 1976, European Accounting Review, 14(1), pp. 213–235. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000338979
  • Sathe, V. (1982) Controller Involvement in Management (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
  • Schipper, K. (2003) Principles-based accounting standards, Accounting Horizons, 17(1), pp. 61–72. doi: 10.2308/acch.2003.17.1.61
  • Siegel, G. and Sorensen, J. E. (1999) Counting More, Counting Less: Transformations in the Management Accounting Profession (Montvale, NJ: Institute of Management Accountants).
  • Simon, H. A., Guetzkow, H., Kozmetsky, G. and Tyndall, G. (1954) Centralization vs. Decentralization in Organizing the Controller’s Department (New York: The Controllership Foundation).
  • Star, S. L. (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: heterogeneous problem-solving, boundary objects and distributed artificial intelligence. in: HuhnsM.GasserL. (Eds) Distributed Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2, (pp. 37–54). (Menlo Park, CA: Morgan Kaufman).2
  • Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1930, Social Studies of Science, 19(3), pp. 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
  • Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y. and Young, M. (2003) From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction. in: Tuomi-GröhnT.EngeströmY. (Eds) Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-Crossing, (pp. pp. 1–15). (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
  • Vaivio, J. and Kokko, T. (2006) Counting big: re-examining the concept of the bean counter controller, The Finnish Journal of Business Economics,1/2006 pp. 49–74.
  • Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Wenger, E. (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems, Organization, 7(2), pp. 225–246. doi: 10.1177/135050840072002
  • Wenger, E., Snyder, W. (2000) Communities of practice? The organizational frontier, Harvard Business Review, January–February, pp. 139–145.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.