When Organisations Deinstitutionalise Control Practices: A Multiple-Case Study of Budget Abandonment

References

• Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(3), 189–204. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00059-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadjian, C. L., & Robinson, P. (2001). Safety in numbers: Downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 622–654. doi: 10.2307/3094826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management control systems (12th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. (1952). The impact of budgets on people. Ithaca, NY: School of Business and Public Administration, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Ax, C., & Bjørnenak, T. (2005). Bundling and diffusion of management accounting innovations: The case of the Balanced Scorecard in Sweden. Management Accounting Research, 16(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2004.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255–276. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00099-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 491–518). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93–117. doi: 10.1177/017084069701800106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. E., & Fraser, L. B. (1977). Conflicting roles in budgeting for operations. Harvard Business Review, 55(4), 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107. doi: 10.1080/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. D., Messner, M., & Schäffer, U. (2010). The evolution of a management accounting idea: The case of Beyond Budgeting. Paper presented at the European Accounting Association 33rd Annual Congress, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Bogsnes, B. (2009). Implementing Beyond Budgeting: Unlocking the performance potential. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34. doi: 10.2307/2393807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, W., & Waterhouse, J. (1975). Budgetary control and organization structure. Journal of Accounting Research, 13(2), 177–203. doi: 10.2307/2490360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, P., Fraser, R., & Hope, J. (2002). Beyond Budgeting: Breaking free from the annual performance trap. In P. Horváth (Ed.), Performance controlling (pp. 33–49). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
   Google Scholar
• Burkert, M., Davila, A., Mehta, K., & Oyon, D. (2014). Relating alternative forms of contingency fit to the appropriate methods to test them. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 6–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkert, M., & Lueg, R. (2013). Differences in the sophistication of value-based management: The role of top executives. Management Accounting Research, 24(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, J. (2009). Addressing definitional ambiguity: Management accounting routines as propensities to act. Working paper, University of Exeter Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J., & Scapens, R. W. (2008). Organizational routines in accounting. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 87–106). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, L. R., & Wholey, D. R. (1993). Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 106–138. doi: 10.2307/256514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busco, C., Quattrone, P., & Riccaboni, A. (2007). Management accounting: Issues in interpreting its nature and change. Management Accounting Research, 18(2), 125–149. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2007.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). Factors influencing the role of management accounting in the development of performance measures within organizational change programs. Management Accounting Research, 9(4), 361–386. doi: 10.1006/mare.1998.0080
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, N. C. (1984). Budget choice: Planning vs. control. Harvard Business Review, 62(4), 150–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covaleski, M. A., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1988). The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: An historically informed field study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13, 1–24. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(88)90023-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., & Dacin, P. A. (2008). Traditions as institutionalized practice: Implications for deinstitutionalization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 327–351). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45–57. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2002.6283388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., Munir, K., & Tracey, P. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393–1418. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2010.57318388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daum, J., & Hope, J. (2005). The origins of Beyond Budgeting and of the Beyond Budgeting Round Table (BBRT): An interview with Jeremy Hope, co-founder and research director of the BBRT. In J. Daum (Ed.), Beyond Budgeting: Impulse zur grundlegenden Neugestaltung der Unternehmensführung und-steuerung (pp. 63–78). Munich: Meidenbauer.
   Google Scholar
• David, R. J., & Bitektine, A. B. (2009). The deinstitutionalization of institutional theory? Exploring divergent agendas in institutional research. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 160–175). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F., Diekmann, K. A., & Tinsley, C. H. (1994). The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review, 59(4), 547–570. doi: 10.2307/2095931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWith, E., & Dijkman, A. (2008). Budgeting practices of listed companies in the Netherlands. Management Accounting Quarterly, 10(1), 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dover, G., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). A gap year for institutional theory: Integrating the study of institutional work and participatory action research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(4), 305–316. doi: 10.1177/1056492610371496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekholm, B.-G., & Wallin, J. (2000). Is the annual budget really dead? European Accounting Review, 9(4), 519–539. doi: 10.1080/09638180020024007
   Google Scholar
• Farjoun, M. (2002). The dialectics of institutional development in emerging and turbulent fields: The history of pricing conventions in the on-line database industry. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 848–874. doi: 10.2307/3069318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 117–134. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.15993150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, L. D., & Merchant, K. A. (1992). Field research in management accounting and control: A review and evaluation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(4), 3–34. doi: 10.1108/09513579210019503
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C. G. (2005). Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 741–763. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. doi: 10.2307/3069285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurton, A. (1999). Bye bye budget…the annual budget is dead. Accountancy (March), p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. C. (2011). A theoretical analysis of the impact of adopting rolling budgets, activity-based budgeting, and Beyond Budgeting. European Accounting Review, 20(2), 289–319. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.496260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. C., Otley, D. T., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2003). Practice developments in budgeting: An overview and research perspective. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15(1), 95–116. doi: 10.2308/jmar.2003.15.1.95
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. C., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2004). Multiple facets of budgeting: An exploratory analysis. Management Accounting Research, 15(4), 415–439. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2004.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Henttu-Aho, T., & Järvinen, J. (2013). A field study of the emerging practice of Beyond Budgeting in industrial companies: An institutional perspective. European Accounting Review, 22(4), 765–785. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.758596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiatt, S. R., Sine, W. D., & Tolbert, P. S. (2009). From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(4), 635–667. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2009.54.4.635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinings, C. R., Greenwood, R., Reay, T., & Suddaby, R. (2004). Dynamics of change in organizational fields. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (pp. 303–323). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. H. (1968). The game of budget control. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, J., & Fraser, R. (1997). Beyond Budgeting…breaking through the barrier to ‘the third wave’. Management Accounting, 75(11), 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, J., & Fraser, R. (2003). Beyond Budgeting: How managers can break free from the annual performance trap. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. (1987). The archaeology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 207–234. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. S., & Moore, J. H. (2002). Executive migration and institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 120–143. doi: 10.2307/3069288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. R. Nord, & T. B. Lawrence (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248–266. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1.3.248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, T., & Lindsay, R. M. (2010). Beyond Budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice. Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 56–75. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, T., & Waterhouse, J. H. (1996). Predicting change in management accounting systems. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 8(1), 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, A. M. (1999). A framework for the analysis of interview data from multiple field research. Accounting and Finance, 39(1), 79–105. doi: 10.1111/1467-629X.00018
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, A. M., & Mundy, J. (2005). Cross-sectional field studies in management accounting research: Closing the gap between surveys and case studies. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 17(1), 119–141. doi: 10.2308/jmar.2005.17.1.119
   Google Scholar
• Lok, J., & DeRond, M. (2013). On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 185–207. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 349–361. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 148–178. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/Aids treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679. doi: 10.2307/20159610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmi, T. (2001). Balanced scorecards in Finnish companies: A research note. Management Accounting Research, 12(2), 207–220. doi: 10.1006/mare.2000.0154
   Google Scholar
• Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package: Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, J. (1988). Reliability and validity in field research: Some strategies and tactics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(1), 34–54. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000004619
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, K. A., & Otley, D. T. (2007). A review of the literature on control and accountability. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of management accounting research (Vol. 2, pp. 785–802). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, S. (2001). Performance measurement and institutional processes: A study of managerial responses to public sector reform. Management Accounting Research, 12(4), 437–464. doi: 10.1006/mare.2001.0164
   Google Scholar
• Morlidge, S., & Player, S. (2010). Future ready: How to master business forecasting. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, J. (2005). Beyond accounting change: Design and mobilisation of management control systems. Journal of Accounting & Organisational Change, 1(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1108/18325910510635317
   Google Scholar
• Munir, K. A. (2005). The social construction of events: A study of institutional change in the photographic field. Organization Studies, 26(1), 93–113. doi: 10.1177/0170840605049463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Sutcliff, M. R., & Heyns, H. R. (2001). Driving value through strategic planning and budgeting. New York, NY: Accenture.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588. doi: 10.1177/017084069201300403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østergren, K., & Stensaker, I. (2011). Management control without budgets: A field study of “Beyond Budgeting” in practice. European Accounting Review, 20(1), 149–181. doi: 10.1080/09638180903487842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D. T. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382. doi: 10.1006/mare.1999.0115
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1989). Longitudinal methods to study change: Theory and practice. In R. Mansfield (Ed.), Frontiers of management: Research and practice (pp. 21–49). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. M., & Gray, B. (2009). Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 355–380. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.22798178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. A. (1996). Deinstitutionalization and the logic of fashion. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sévon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 139–172). Berlin, NY: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108–140). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seal, W. (2003). Modernity, modernization and the deinstitutionalization of incremental budgeting in local government. Financial Accountability & Management, 19(2), 93–116. doi: 10.1111/1468-0408.00165
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sine, W. D., & David, R. J. (2003). Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Research Policy, 32(2), 185–207. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00096-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., Morris, T. I. M., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: Multi-level model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524. doi: 10.2307/2392337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, D., & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511. doi: 10.1007/BF00993595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Huber, G. P. (1990). Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organization Science, 1(3), 213–219. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1.3.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallander, J. (1994). Budgeten: Ett onödigt ont. Stockholm: SNS-Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wallander, J. (1999). Budgeting: An unnecessary evil. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 15(4), 405–421. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5221(98)00032-3
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, R. H. (2012). Reflecting on perceived deinstitutionalization of gender-biased employment practices in accountancy. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 9(4), 300–336. doi: 10.1108/11766091211282652
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theory of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar