Audit Partner Public-Client Specialisation and Client Abnormal Accruals

References

• Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney, W. R., & LaFond, R. (2008). The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 217–250. doi: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsam, S., Krishnan, J., & Yang, J. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 71–97. doi: 10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, C., DeFond, M., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
   Google Scholar
• Bédard, J. (1989). Expertise in auditing: Myth or reality? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14, 113–131. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(89)90037-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bédard, J., & Chi, M. T. H. (1993). Expertise in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12(Supplement), 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, S., & Walker, P. (1994). The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge. The Accounting Review, 69, 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H., & Johnstone, K. M. (2009). Resolving disputed financial reporting issues: Effects of auditor negotiation experience and engagement risk on negotiation process and outcomes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 65–92. doi: 10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653–676. doi: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, H., & Chin, C. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 201–229. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Chi, H. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–765. doi: 10.1506/car.26.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, D., & Hribar, P. (2000). Earnings-based and accrual based market anomalies: One effect or two. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 101–123. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00015-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core, J., Holthausen, R., & Larcker, D. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371–406. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2006). Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/60/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union L157/87, 9 June 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297–322. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00403-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. R. (2005). Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(Supplement), 5–30. doi: 10.2308/aud.2005.24.Supplement.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Park, C. W. (2001). The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 76(3), 5–30. doi: 10.2308/accr.2001.76.3.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., Francis, J. R., & Stokes, D. J. (2003). The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review, 78(2), 429–448. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fich, E., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00852.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework of understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J. (1999). Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 135–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1999.tb00577.x
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Reichelt, K., & Wang, D. (2005). The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 113–136. doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Richard, C., & Vanstraelen, A. (2009). Assessing France's joint audit requirement: Are two heads better than one? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 35–63. doi: 10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Stokes, D. J., & Anderson, D. (1999). City markets as a unit of analysis in audit research and the re-examination of Big 6 market shares. Abacus, 35(2), 185–206. doi: 10.1111/1467-6281.00040
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and Big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157–191. doi: 10.1506/car.25.1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1521–1552. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, M., Haller, A., & Nobes, C. (2010). The influence of tax on IFRS consolidated statements: The convergence of Germany and the UK. Accounting in Europe, 7(1), 97–122. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2010.485382
   Google Scholar
• Hribar, P., & Nichols, C. (2007). The use of unsigned earnings quality measures in tests of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(5), 1017–1053. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00259.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittonen, K., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). Female auditors and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 205–228. doi: 10.2308/acch-50400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, K., & Tan, H. T. (2001). Can auditors predict the choices made by other auditors? Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 583–597. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, K. M., Bedard, J. C., & Biggs, S. F. (2002). Aggressive client reporting: Factors affecting auditors’ generation of financial reporting alternatives. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 47–65. doi: 10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, K. M., Li, C., & Luo, S. (in press). Client-auditor supply chain relationships, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, K. M., Sutton, M., & Warfield, T. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of independence risk: Framework for analysis. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 1–18. doi: 10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228. doi: 10.2307/2491047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., O'Donnell, E., & Arel, B. (2008). The influence of auditor experience on the persuasiveness of information provided by management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 27(1), 67–83. doi: 10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G. V. (2003). Does Big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons, 17(Supplement), 1–16. doi: 10.2308/acch.2003.17.s-1.1
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G. V. (2005). The association between Big 6 auditor industry expertise and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance, 20(3), 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Zhang, P. (2011). Can big 4 versus non-big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? The Accounting Review, 86(1), 259–286. doi: 10.2308/accr.00000009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. S., Francis, J. R., & Wang, Z. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616. doi: 10.2308/accr-10195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425–450. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R., & Tan, H. T. (1994). Modeling determinants of audit expertise. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19(8), 701–716. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(94)90030-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maijoor, S., & Vanstraelen, A. (2006). Earnings management within Europe: The effects of member state audit environment, audit firm quality and international capital markets. Accounting and Business Research, 36(1), 33–52. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730005
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. W., Libby, R., & Bonner, S. E. (1995). Knowledge structure and the estimation of conditional probabilities in audit planning. The Accounting Review, 70(1), 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peasnell, K., Pope, P., & Young, S. (2005). Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(7), 1311–1346. doi: 10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00630.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek, E., Meuwissen, R., Moers, F., & Vanstraelen, A. (2013). An evaluation of abnormal accruals measurement models in an international context. European Accounting Review, 22(3), 533–572. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.746518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2009). Concept release on requiring the engagement partner to sign the audit report. PCAOB Release No. 2009–005.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, R. J. (1994). Senior/manager differences in audit workpaper review performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 127–145. doi: 10.2307/2491391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichelt, K., & Wang, D. (2010). National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J., & Francis, J. R. (2001). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375–400. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00010-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackelford, D. A., & Shevlin, T. (2001). Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 31(1–3), 321–387. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, I., Shields, M., & Whittington, O. (1999). What do industry-specialist auditors know? Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 191–208. doi: 10.2307/2491403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, J. C. (2003). The development and transferability of task knowledge. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 22(1), 47–67. doi: 10.2308/aud.2003.22.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tendeloo, B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe: Evidence from the private client segment market. European Accounting Review, 17(3), 447–469. doi: 10.1080/09638180802016684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerni, M. (2012). Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 312–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerni, M., Haapamäki, E., Järvinen, T., & Niemi, L. (2012). Do joint audits improve audit quality? Evidence from voluntary joint audits. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 731–765. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.678599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar