5,376
Views
231
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Valuation Relevance of Greenhouse Gas Emissions under the European Union Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme

, , &
Pages 551-580 | Received 12 Dec 2012, Accepted 03 May 2014, Published online: 19 Jun 2014

References

  • Barth, M., & McNichols, M. (1994). Estimation and market valuation of environmental liabilities relating to superfund sites. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(Suppl.), 177–209. doi: 10.2307/2491446
  • Bebbington, J., & Larrinaga-Gonza'lez, C. (2008). Carbon trading: Accounting and reporting issues. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 697–717. doi: 10.1080/09638180802489162
  • Black, C. (2013). Accounting for carbon emission allowances in the European Union: In search of consistency. Accounting in Europe, 10(2), 223–239. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2013.834730
  • Carmona, S. (2009). Editorial. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/09638180902859884
  • Chapple, L., Clarkson, P., & Gold, D. (2013). The cost of carbon: Capital market effects of the proposed emission trading scheme (ETS). Abacus, 49(1), 1–33. doi: 10.1111/abac.12006
  • Clarkson, P., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2004). The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 329–353. doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.329
  • Clarkson, P., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013
  • Collins, D., Maydew, E., & Weiss, I. (1997). Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book value over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 39–67. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00015-3
  • Commission of the European Communities. (2004). On guidance to assist Member States in the implementation of the criteria listed in Annex III to Directive 2003/87/EC.
  • Commission of the European Communities. (2005). Further guidance on allocation plans for the 2008 to 2012 trading period of the EU Emission Trading Scheme.
  • Connors, E., & Silva-Gao, L. (2008). The impact of environmental risk on the cost of equity capital: Evidence from the toxic release inventory. Working paper. Boston: University of Massachusetts.
  • Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (1997). Investors’ assessment of implicit environmental liabilities: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 215–241. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4254(97)00002-1
  • Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Morand, B. (1993). The impact of corporate pollution on market valuation: Some empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 8(2), 135–155. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(93)90041-4
  • Deutsche Bank. (2009, October 23). Australian Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: De-carbonising the CPRS. Sydney: Author.
  • Ertimur, Y., Francis, J., Gonzales, A., & Schipper, K. (2011). Financial reporting for cap-and-trade emissions reduction program. Working paper. Duke University.
  • Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reactions: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0744
  • Fullerton, D., & Heutel, G. (2007). The general equilibrium incidence of environmental taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 91(3–4), 571–591. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.07.004
  • Goncharov, I., & Veenman, D. (2014). Stale and scale effects in markets-based accounting research: Evidence from the valuation of dividends. European Accounting Review, 23(1), 25–55. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2013.795870
  • Goodstein, E. (2002). Economics and the environment (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
  • Grainger, C., & Kolstad, C. (2010). Who pays a price on carbon? Environmental and Resource Economics, 46(3), 359–376. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9345-x
  • Griffin, P., Lont, D., & Sun, Y. (2013). The relevance to investors of greenhouse gas emissions disclosures. Working paper. University of California, Davis.
  • Hamilton, J. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 98–113. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1995.1007
  • Hart, S., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between pollution prevention and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199603)5:1<30::AID-BSE38>3.0.CO;2-Q
  • Haupt, M., & Ismer, R. (2013). The EU emissions trading system under IFRS – towards a “true and fair view”. Accounting in Europe, 10(1), 71–97. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2013.772726
  • Hughes, K. (2000). The value relevance of nonfinancial measures of air pollution in the electric utility industry. The Accounting Review, 75(2), 209–228. doi: 10.2308/accr.2000.75.2.209
  • IRRC Institute and Trucost. (2009). Carbon risks and opportunities in the S&P 500. Retrieved from http://www.trucost.com/publications
  • Jaggi, B., & Freedman, M. (1992). An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: Pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19(5), 697–713. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1992.tb00652.x
  • Johnson, D., Sefcik, S., & Soderstrom, N. (2008). The value relevance of greenhouse gas emissions allowances: An exploratory study in the related United States SO2 market. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 747–764. doi: 10.1080/09638180802481615
  • Klassen, R., & McLaughlin, C. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1199
  • Kolk, A., Levy, D., & Pinske, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719–745. doi: 10.1080/09638180802489121
  • Laine, M. (2010). Towards sustaining the status quo: Business talk of sustainability in Finnish corporate disclosures 1987–2005. European Accounting Review, 19(2), 247–274. doi: 10.1080/09638180903136258
  • Lennox, C., Francis, J., & Wang, Z. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616. doi: 10.2308/accr-10195
  • Maddala, G. (1991). A perspective on the use of limited-dependent qualitative variable models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 66(4), 788–807.
  • Matisoff, D. (2010). Carbon trading, policy design and firm behavior: Improving the efficiency of climate change policy. Environment, 52(1), 10–19. doi: 10.1080/00139150903479530
  • Matsumura, E., Prakash, R., & Vera-Munoz, S. (2014). Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosure. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695–724. doi: 10.2308/accr-50629
  • Ohlson, J. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x
  • Petersen, M. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
  • PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2007). Trouble-entry accounting – Revisited.
  • Schneider, T. (2011). Is environmental performance a determinant of bond pricing? Evidence from the U.S. pulp and paper and chemical industries. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1537–1561. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01064.x
  • Sharfman, M., & Fernando, C. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592. doi: 10.1002/smj.678
  • Sijim, J., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y. (2006). CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6(1), 49–72. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588
  • Smale, R. Hartley, C., Hepburn, C., Ward, J., & Grubb, M. (2006). The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices. Climate Policy, 6(1), 31–48. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685587
  • Veith, S., Werner, J., & Zimmermann, J. (2009). Competing accounting treatments for emission rights: A capital market perspective. Working paper, University of Bremen.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.