The Construction of Risk Management Credibility Within Corporate Boardrooms

References

• Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ailon, G. (2012). The discursive management of financial risk scandals: The case of Wall Street Journal commentaries on LTCM and Enron. Qualitative Sociology, 35(3), 251–270. doi: 10.1007/s11133-012-9217-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2014). Habitat and habitus: Boxed-in versus box-breaking research. Organization Studies, 35(7), 967–987. doi: 10.1177/0170840614530916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1194–1220. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 659–675. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, H. (1969). La pensée et le mouvant: Articles et conférences datant de 1903 à 1923. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, S., & Batta, A. (2010). Just doing it: Enjoying commodity fetishism with Lacan. Organization, 17(3), 345–361. doi: 10.1177/1350508410363123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, E., & Rouleau, L. (2011). New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 272–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, M., & Sapp, S. (2007). ICD blue ribbon commission on the governance of executive compensation in Canada: Final report. Toronto: Institute of Corporate Directors.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. E. (2012). A framework for board oversight of enterprise risk. Toronto: Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called Science? (3rd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Colville, I., Brown, A. D., & Pye, A. (2012). Simplexity: Sensemaking, organizing and storytelling for our time. Human Relations, 65(1), 5–15. doi: 10.1177/0018726711425617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. J., & Morgan, W. (2008). Case study research in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 22(2), 159–178. doi: 10.2308/acch.2008.22.2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courpasson, D. (2000). Managerial strategies of domination: Power in soft bureaucracies. Organization Studies, 21(1), 141–161. doi: 10.1177/0170840600211001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 1–34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, S., & Gendron, Y. (2011). IFRS: On the docility of sophisticated users in preserving the ideal of comparability. European Accounting Review, 20(2), 233–262. doi: 10.1080/09638181003687869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (1978). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, S. (1993). Organizations as emotional arenas. In S. Finenam (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (pp. 9–35). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison [Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison]. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault, power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 109–133). Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funston, F., & Wagner, S. (2010). Surviving and thriving in uncertainty: Creating the risk intelligent enterprise. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y. (2013). Rethinking the concept of research contribution. Comptabilité – Contrôle – Audit, 19(3), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., & Bédard, J. (2006). On the constitution of audit committee effectiveness. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(3), 211–239. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., Cooper, D. J., & Townley, B. (2007). The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1/2), 101–129. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., & Spira, L. F. (2010). Identity narratives under threat: A study of former members of Arthur Andersen. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(3), 275–300. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. P., Van Maanen, J., & Oberlechner, T. (2009). Organizations and risk in late modernity. Organization Studies, 30(2/3), 141–155. doi: 10.1177/0170840608101474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Global Risk Institute in Financial Services. (2011). Creating the research agenda: Risk issues in financial services, session summary. Global Risk Institute's inaugural round table. Toronto: Global Risk Institute in Financial Services.
   Google Scholar
• Golant, B. D., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1149–1167. doi: 10.1177/0170840607075671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2007). Composing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grepin, L., Tétrault, J., & Vainberg, G. (2010). After black swans and red ink: How institutional investors can rethink risk management (McKinsey working papers on risk, number 17). McKinsey & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Guénin-Paracini, H., & Gendron, Y. (2010). Auditors as modern pharmakoi: Legitimacy paradoxes and the production of economic order. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(2), 134–158. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2009.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B., & Marché Paillé, A. (2014). Fear and risk in the audit process. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(4), 264–288. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622. doi: 10.1080/00071310020015280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1997). Introduction. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 1–11). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hayne, C., & Free, C. (2014). Hybridized professional groups and institutional work: COSO and the rise of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(5), 309–330. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, C., & Scheytt, T. (2013). The dispositive of risk management: Reconstructing risk management after the financial crisis. Management Accounting Research, 24(2), 88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2013.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., & Miller, P. (2012). Rethinking impact and redefining responsibility: The parameters and coordinates of accounting and public management reforms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(2), 295–327. doi: 10.1108/09513571211198773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., Moizer, P., & Turley, S. (1992). The audit expectations gap—plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3(2), 137–161. doi: 10.1016/1045-2354(92)90008-F
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. (2004). Introduction: Legitimacy processes in organizations. In C. Johnson (Ed.), Legitimacy processes in organizations (pp. 1–24). Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jupe, R., & Funnell, W. (2015). Neoliberalism, consultants and the privatisation of public policy formulation: The case of Britain's rail industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 29, 65–85. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. (2011). Accounting scholarship that advances professional knowledge and practice. The Accounting Review, 86(2), 367–383. doi: 10.2308/accr.00000031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouakou, D., Boiral, O., & Gendron, Y. (2013). ISO auditing and the construction of trust in auditor independence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(8), 1279–1305. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P. (1997). Élites irrégulières: Essai sur la délinquance d'affaires. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. K. (1993). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the 1993 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Linsley, P. M., & Shrives, P. J. (2009). Mary Douglas, risk and accounting failures. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(4), 492–508. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, N. B. (2009). “Effective” genealogical history: Possibilities for critical accounting history research. Accounting Historians Journal, 36(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., & Gendron, Y. (2013). Re-theorizing change: Institutional experimentation and the struggle for domination in the field of public accounting. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), 870–899. doi: 10.1111/joms.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., Gendron, Y., & Grazzini, F. (2011). Investigating interdisciplinary translations: The influence of Pierre Bourdieu on accounting literature. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(2), 194–228. doi: 10.1108/09513571111100681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikes, A. (2011). From counting risk to making risk count: Boundary-work in risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(4/5), 226–245. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & O'Leary, T. (2007). Mediating instruments and making markets: Capital budgeting, science and the economy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7/8), 701–734. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything: Rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6/7), 849–855. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2013). The apparatus of fraud risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6/7), 525–543. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. K. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–394. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. K., & Gendron, Y. (2015). Qualitative research in auditing: A methodological roadmap. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(2), 147–165. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-10423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonian, H. (2011, September 15). Rogue trader loses UBS $2bn. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Skærbæk, P. (2009). Public sector auditor identities in making efficiency auditable: The National Audit Office of Denmark as independent auditor and modernizer. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 971–987. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skærbæk, P., & Christensen, M. (2014). Auditing and the purification of blame. Contemporary Accounting Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, C., Husillos, J., & Correa-Ruiz, C. (2010). Cargo cult science and the death of politics: A critical review of social and environmental accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(1), 76–89. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.008
   Google Scholar
• Spira, L. F. (2002). The audit committee: Performing corporate governance. London: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. (2004). The critical period of disasters: Insights from sense-making and psychoanalytic theory. Human Relations, 57(10), 1243–1261. doi: 10.1177/0018726704048354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolowy, H., Messner, M., Jeanjean, T., & Baker, C. R. (2014). The construction of a trustworthy investment opportunity: Insights from the Madoff fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 354–397. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A. (1997). The consultancy process – An insecure business? Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 389–413. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 539–550. doi: 10.2307/2392360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnari, E., & Skærbæk, P. (2014). The uncertainties of risk management: A field study on risk management internal audit practices in a Finnish municipality. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(3), 489–526. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-09-2012-1106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2012). Organized sensemaking: A commentary on processes of interpretive work. Human Relations, 65(1), 141–153. doi: 10.1177/0018726711424235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. (2014). Separating the political and technical: Accounting standard-setting and purification. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 713–747. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar