Consequences of the Abandonment of Mandatory Joint Audit: An Empirical Study of Audit Costs and Audit Quality Effects

References

• André, P., Broye, G., Pong, C. K. M., & Schatt, A. (2015). Are joint audits associated with higher audit fees? European Accounting Review, doi:10.1080/09638180.2014.998016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÅRL §96. (2001). Lov nr 448 af 07/06/2001. Lov om erhvervsdrivende virksomheders aflæggelse af årsregnskab m.v. (årsregnskabsloven). Danish Act on Commercial Enterprises’ Presentation of Financial Statements.
   Google Scholar
• Audousset-Coulier, S. (2015). Audit fees in a joint audit setting. European Accounting Review, 24(2), 347–377. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2014.892787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. Accounting Review, 81(3), 653–676. doi: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-H., Kim, C. F., Kim, J.-B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit office size, audit quality and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 29(1), 207–220. doi: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-H., Kim, J.-B., Liu, X., & Simunic, D. A. (2009). Cross-listing audit fee premiums: Theory and evidence. Accounting Review, 84(5), 1429–1463. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Financial Statement Act. (2001). Forslag til Lov om erhvervsdrivende virksomheders aflæggelse af årsregnskab m.v. (årsregnskabsloven) (The proposal to Danish Financial Statements Act, §135).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. M., Lukomnik, J., & Pitt-Watson, D. (2006). The new capitalists: How citizen investors are reshaping the corporate agenda. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Park, C. (2001). The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 76(3), 375–404. doi: 10.2308/accr.2001.76.3.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 58(2/3), 275–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, M., Lu, T., Simunic, D. A., & Ye, M. (2014). Do joint audits improve or impair audit quality? Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1029–1060. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2001). A study on systems of civil liability of statutory auditors in the context of a single market for auditing services in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/auditing/docs/liability/auditliability_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Green paper: Audit policy: Lessons from the crisis. Retrieved from Brussels, European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2010/audit/green_paper_audit_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). Commission staff working paper: Impact assessment. Retrieved from Brussels, European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/auditing/docs/reform/impact_assesment_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Memo 13–11, Commissioner Michel Barnier welcomes provisional agreement in trilogue on the reform of the audit sector. Retrieved from Brussels, European Commission: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDEQFjAA&url=http3A2F2Feuropa.eu2Frapid%2Fpress-release_MEMO-13–1171_en.pdf&ei=IOK-UoWdAqOuygO-o4HICw&usg=AFQjCNFW4_ZvUmJ-3fbvkrwK0-P2yj4Dsw&bvm=bv.58187178,d.bGQ
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 2014, L 158/77.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(2), 133–151. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(84)90010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345–368. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., & Seavey, S. (2013). Does audit market concentration harm the quality of audited earnings? Evidence from audit markets in 42 countries. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 325–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01156.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Richard, C. (2009). Assessing France's joint audit requirement: Are two heads better than one? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(2), 35–63. doi: 10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157–191. doi: 10.1506/car.25.1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonthier-Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2007). Determinants of audit fees for French quoted firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 139–160. doi: 10.1108/02686900710718654
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191. doi: 10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, C., & Thinggaard, F. (2014). Leaving a joint audit system: Conditional fee reductions. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(2), 131–152. doi: 10.1108/MAJ-05-2013-0862
   Google Scholar
• Holm, C., & Thinggaard, F. (2015). Paying for joint or single audits? The importance of auditor pairings and differences in technology efficiency. International Journal of Auditing. doi:10.1111/ijau.12050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, C., & Warming-Rasmussen, B. (2008). An account of accountants. Audit regulation and the audit profession in Denmark. In R. Quick, S. Turley, & M. Willekens (Eds.), Auditing, trust and governance – Regulation in Europe (pp. 42–77). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ittonen, K., & Peni, E. (2012). Auditor's gender and audit fees. The International Journal of Auditing, 16(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2011.00438.x
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, J. (2011). Audit quality and cost of debt capital for private firms: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), 88–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2010.00424.x
   Google Scholar
• London Economics, & Ewert, R. (2006). Study on the economic impact of auditors’ liability regimes (MARKT/2005/24/F), Final report to EC-DG Internal market and services Retrieved from Brussels, European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/auditing/docs/liability/auditors-final-report_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mazars. (2012). An insight into joint audit. Internal Mazars documentation.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., & Walker, M. (1984). The free rider problem: Experimental evidence. Public Choice, 43(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00137902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1968). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proposal for the Act. (2001). Preparatory work for the “LOV nr 448 af 07/06/2001. Lov om erhvervsdrivende virksomheders aflæggelse af årsregnskab m.v.” (The Danish Financial Statements Act 2001). Fremsat den 10. januar 2001 af erhvervsministeren (Ole Stavad), Forslag til Lov om erhvervsdrivende virksomheders aflæggelse af årsregnskab m.v. (årsregnskabsloven).
   Google Scholar
• Quick, R., & Warming-Rasmussen, B. (2005). The impact of MAS on perceived auditor independence – Some evidence from Denmark. Accounting Forum, 29, 137–168. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2004.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Ratzinger-Sakel, N. (2013). Auditor fees and auditor independence – Evidence from going concern reporting decisions in Germany. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(4), 129–168. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEC. (2010). Public company accounting oversight board; Order approving proposed rules on Auditing Standard No. 7, Engagement quality review, and conforming amendment, Release No. 34–61363; File No. PCAOB-2009–02, January 15, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. doi: 10.2307/2490397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thinggaard, F., & Kiertzner, L. (2008). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from a small capital market with a joint audit requirement. International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), 141–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00377.x
   Google Scholar
• Treadway. (1987). Treadway commission: Report of the national commission on fraudulent financial reporting. New York, NY: AICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), 721–744. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsor, C., & Warming-Rasmussen, B. (2009). The rise of regulatory capitalism and the decline of auditor independence: A critical and experimental examination of auditors’ conflicts of interests. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 267–288. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2007.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Zeghal, D., Chtourou, S. M., & Fourati, Y. M. (2012). The effect of mandatory adoption of IFRS on earnings quality: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(2), 1–25. doi: 10.2308/jiar-10221
   Google Scholar
• Zerni, M., Haapamäki, E., Järvinen, T., & Niemi, L. (2012). Do joint audits improve audit quality? Evidence from voluntary joint audits. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 731–765. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.678599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerni, M., Kallunki, J.-P., & Nilsson, H. (2010). The entrenchment problem, corporate governance mechanisms, and firm value. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(4), 1169–1206. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar