28,083
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Challenge of Setting Standards for a Worldwide Constituency: Research Implications from the IASB’s Early History

&
Pages 289-312 | Received 02 May 2016, Accepted 04 Feb 2017, Published online: 01 Mar 2017

References

  • Abela, M., & Mora, A. (2012). Understanding the consequences of accounting standards in Europe: The role of EFRAG. Accounting in Europe, 9(2), 147–170. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.720872
  • Adhikari, A., Betancourt, L., & Alshameri, F. (2014). The SEC’s proposed IFRS roadmap: An analysis of comment letters using content analysis and textual software. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 98–108. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.07.001
  • Albu, N., Albu, C. N., Bunea, S., Calu, D. A., & Girbina, M. M. (2011). A story about IAS/IFRS implementation in Romania. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 1(1), 76–100. doi: 10.1108/20421161111107868
  • Alexander, D., & Eberhartinger, E. (2010). The European Union endorsement process for international financial reporting standards: A telos-based analysis. Accounting in Europe, 7(1), 37–62. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2010.485373
  • Annisette, M. (2004). The true nature of the World Bank. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(3), 303–323. doi: 10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00064-9
  • Baker, C. R., Biondi, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2010). Disharmony in international accounting standards setting: The Chinese approach to accounting for business combinations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(2), 107–117. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2009.11.004
  • Bamber, M., & McMeeking, K. (2016). An examination of international accounting standard-setting due process and the implications for legitimacy. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2015.03.003
  • Baskerville, R. (2014). Turf wars or missionary zeal: IFRS, IFAC, the World Bank and the IMF. In C. Van Mourik & P. Walton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to accounting, reporting and regulation (pp. 281–298). London: Routledge.
  • Baudot, L. (2014). GAAP convergence or convergence gap: Unfolding ten years of accounting change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(6), 956–994. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1297
  • Bengtsson, E. (2011). Repoliticalization of accounting standard setting: The IASB, the EU and the global financial crisis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(6), 567–580. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2011.04.001
  • Benston, G. J., Bromwich, M., Litan, R. E., & Wagenhofer, A. (2006). Worldwide financial reporting: The development and future of accounting standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bischof, J., & Daske, H. (2016). Interpreting the European Union’s IFRS endorsement criteria: The case of IFRS 9. Accounting in Europe, 13(2), 129–168. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2016.1210181
  • Botzem, S. (2012). The politics of accounting regulation: Organizing transnational standard setting in financial reporting. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Botzem, S. (2014). Transnational standard setting in accounting: Organizing expertise-based self-regulation in times of crises. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(6), 933–955. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1301
  • Brown, A. M. (2006). The financial milieu of the IASB and the AASB. Australian Accounting Review, 16(1), 85–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2006.tb00329.x
  • Brown, P., & Tarca, A. (2005). A commentary on issues relating to the enforcement of international financial reporting standards in the EU. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 181–212. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000338997
  • Burlaud, A., & Colasse, B. (2011). International accounting standardisation: Is politics back? Accounting in Europe, 8(1), 23–47. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2011.574412
  • Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2007). Financial reporting and global capital markets: A history of the international accounting standards committee, 1973–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2015). Aiming for global accounting standards: The international accounting standards board, 2001–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Carlin, T. M., & Finch, N. (2010). Resisting compliance with IFRS goodwill accounting and reporting disclosures. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 6(2), 260–280. doi: 10.1108/18325911011048781
  • Cherry, A. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2013). What’s the rush? IFRS, the SEC, and the pressure on accounting instructors to teach still more financial reporting rules. American Journal of Business Education, 6(2), 161–176.
  • Chiapello, E. (2005). Les normes comptables comme institution du capitalisme: une analyse du passage aux normes IFRS en Europe à partir de 2005. Sociologie du Travail, 47, 362–382. doi: 10.1016/j.soctra.2005.06.002
  • Chiapello, E., & Medjad, K. (2009). An unprecedented privatisation of mandatory standard-setting: The case of European accounting policy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(4), 448–468. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.002
  • Crawford, L., Ferguson, J., Helliar, C. V., & Power, D. M. (2014). Control over accounting standards within the European Union: The political controversy surrounding the adoption of IFRS 8. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4), 304–318. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2013.03.001
  • Danjou, P., & Walton, P. (2012). The legitimacy of the IASB. Accounting in Europe, 9(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.664396
  • Dick, W., & Walton, P. (2007). The IASB agenda: A moving target. Australian Accounting Review, 17(2), 8–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2007.tb00438.x
  • Ding, Y., Hope, O.-K., Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2007). Differences between domestic accounting standards and IAS: Measurement, determinants and implications. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(1), 1–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.11.001
  • Fleckner, A. M. (2008). FASB and IASB: Dependence despite independence. Virginia Law & Business Review, 34(2), 276–309.
  • Fortin, H., Hirata Barros, A. C., & Cutler, K. (2010). Accounting for growth in Latin America and the Caribbean: Improving corporate financial reporting to support regional economic development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Gelter, M., & Kavame, Z. G. (2014). Whose Trojan horse? The dynamics of resistance against IFRS. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 36(1), 89–190.
  • Ghio, A., & Verona, R. (2015). Accounting harmonization in the BRIC countries: A common path? Accounting Forum, 39, 121–139. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2015.02.001
  • Giner, B., & Arce, M. (2012). Lobbying on accounting standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on share-based payments. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 655–691. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.701796
  • Goedl, P. (2012). Defining the IASB’s governance network: A social network analysis. International Journal of Critical Accounting, 4(1), 30–53. doi: 10.1504/IJCA.2012.045780
  • Gornik-Tomaszewski, S. (2005). Antecedents and expected outcomes of the new accounting regulation in the European Union. Research in Accounting Regulation, 18, 69–103. doi: 10.1016/S1052-0457(05)18004-7
  • Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. (2010a). Global accounting convergence and the potential adoption of IFRS by the U.S. (Part I): Conceptual underpinnings and economic analysis. Accounting Horizons, 24(3), 355–394. doi: 10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.355
  • Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. (2010b). Global accounting convergence and the potential adoption of IFRS by the U.S. (Part II): Political factors and future scenarios for U.S. accounting standards. Accounting Horizons 24(4), 567–588. doi: 10.2308/acch.2010.24.4.567
  • Haller, A. (2002). Financial accounting developments in the European Union: Past events and future prospects. European Accounting Review, 11(1), 153–190. doi: 10.1080/09638180220124770
  • Hoogendoorn, M. (2006). International accounting regulation and IFRS implementation in Europe and beyond – Experiences with first-time adoption in Europe. Accounting in Europe, 3(1), 23–26. doi: 10.1080/09638180600920087
  • Hope, O.-K., Jin, J., & Kang, T. (2006). Empirical evidence on jurisdictions that adopt IFRS. Journal of International Accounting Research, 5(2), 1–20. doi: 10.2308/jiar.2006.5.2.1
  • Jermakowicz, E. K., & Gornik-Tomaszewski, S. (2006). Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EU publicly traded companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 170–196. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.003
  • Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., & van der Tas, L. (2012). Formal participation in the IASB’s due process of standard setting: A multi-issue/multi-period analysis. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 693–729. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
  • Kavame, Z. G. (in press). The political economy of international standard setting in financial reporting: How the US led the adoption of IFRS across the world. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business.
  • Kaya, D., Henselmann, K., & Kirsch, R. J. (2016). The role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as intermediaries of the European Union decision to adopt international accounting standards: 1973–2002. Accounting Historians Journal, 43(2), 59–127.
  • Kaya, D., & Pillhofer, J. A. (2013). Potential adoption of IFRS by the United States: A critical view. Accounting Horizons, 27(2), 271–299. doi: 10.2308/acch-50423
  • Kirsch, R. J. (2012). The evolution of the relationship between the US financial accounting standards board and the international accounting standard setters: 1973–2008. The Accounting Historians Journal, 39(1), 1–51.
  • Königsgruber, R. (2010). A political economy of accounting standard setting. Journal of Management & Governance, 14(4), 277–295. doi: 10.1007/s10997-009-9101-1
  • Kosi, U. & Reither, A. (2014). Determinants of corporate participation in the IFRS 4 (insurance contracts) replacement process. Accounting in Europe, 11(1), 89–112. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2014.897459
  • Larson, R. K. (2007). Constituent participation and the IASB’s international financial reporting interpretations committee. Accounting in Europe, 4(1–2), 207–254. doi: 10.1080/17449480701727981
  • Larson, R. K., & Herz, P. J. (2013). A multi-issue/multi-period analysis of the geographic diversity of IASB comment letter participation. Accounting in Europe, 10(1), 99–151. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2013.772716
  • Larson, R. K., & Kenny, S. Y. (2011). The financing of the IASB: An analysis of donor diversity. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 20(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2010.12.003
  • Leblond, P. (2011). EU, US and international accounting standards: A delicate balancing act in governing global finance. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(3), 443–461. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.551083
  • Lin, J., & Fink, P. (2013). International financial reporting standards: Are they right for the United States? Journal of Global Business Issues, 7(2), 59–67.
  • Luthardt, U., & Zimmermann, J. (2009). A European view on the legitimacy of accounting procedures: Towards a deliberative-accountability framework for analysis. Research in Accounting Regulation, 21(2), 79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.racreg.2009.06.001
  • Maroun, W., & van Zijl, T. (2016). Isomorphism and resistance in implementing IFRS 10 and IFRS 12. The British Accounting Review, 48(2), 220–239. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2015.07.003
  • Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2005). Global private governance: Lessons from a national model of setting standards in accounting. Law and Contemporary Problems, 68(3/4), 225–262.
  • McGregor, W. (2012). Personal reflections on ten years of the IASB. Australian Accounting Review, 22(3), 225–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00184.x
  • Nobes, C. (2003). On the myth of “Anglo-Saxon” financial accounting: A comment. The International Journal of Accounting, 38(1), 95–104. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7063(02)00213-3
  • Nobes, C. (2011). IFRS practices and the persistence of accounting system classification. Abacus, 47(3), 267–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00341.x
  • Nölke, A. (2015). Rising powers and transnational private governance: The international accounting standards board. In D. Lesage & T. Van de Graaf (Eds.), Rising powers and multilateral institutions (pp. 96–116). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Pacter, P. (2005). What exactly is convergence? International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 2(1–2), 67–83. doi: 10.1504/IJAAPE.2005.006893
  • Pelger, C. (2016). Practices of standard-setting: An analysis of the IASB’s and FASB’s process of identifying the objective of financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 51–73. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.001
  • Perry, J., & Nölke, A. (2005). International accounting standard setting: A network approach. Business and Politics, 7(3), article 5. doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1136
  • Phuong, N. C. (2016) Vietnam. Institutional theory and accounting change: An analyze [sic] of accounting regulations in Vietnam. In D. Bensadon & N. Praquin (Eds.), Essays in honor of professor Jacques Richard: IFRS in a global world – International and critical perspectives on accounting (pp. 421–434). Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Posner, E. (2010). Sequence as explanation: The international politics of accounting standards. Review of International Political Economy, 17(4), 639–664. doi: 10.1080/09692291003723748
  • Previts, G., Walton, P., & Wolnizer, P. (Eds.). (2010–2012). A global history of accounting, financial reporting and public policy. Studies in the development of accounting thought (Vols. 14A–14D). Bingley: Emerald.
  • Raffournier, B. (2014). The application of IFRS across different institutional environments. In C. Van Mourik & P. Walton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to accounting, reporting and regulation (pp. 281–298). London: Routledge.
  • Ram, R. D. (2012). Development of the international financial reporting standard for small and medium-sized entities (Doctoral dissertation). University of Sydney, Sydney.
  • Ram, R., & Newberry, S. (2013). IFRS for SME’s: The IASB’s due process. Australian Accounting Review, 23(1), 3–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2012.00174.x
  • Ramanna, K., & Sletten, E. (2014). Network effects in countries’ adoption of IFRS. The Accounting Review, 89(4), 1517–1543. doi: 10.2308/accr-50717
  • Richardson, A. J. (2009). Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: A social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(5), 571–588. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.005
  • Richardson, A. J., & Eberlein, B. (2011). Legitimating transnational standard-setting: The case of the international accounting standards board. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(2), 217–245. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0543-9
  • Stevenson, K. M. (2010). Commentary: IFRS and the domestic standard setter – Is the mourning period over? Australian Accounting Review, 20(3), 308–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00103.x
  • Street, D. L., & Larson, R. K. (2004). Large accounting firms’ survey reveals emergence of “two standard” system in the European Union. Advances in International Accounting, 17, 1–29. doi: 10.1016/S0897-3660(04)17001-3
  • Tan, A., Chatterjee, B., Wise, V., & Hossain, M. (2016). An investigation into the potential adoption of international financial reporting standards in the United States: Implications and implementation. Australian Accounting Review, 26(76), 45–65. doi: 10.1111/auar.12081
  • Tyrrall, D., Woodward, D., & Rakhimbekova, A. (2007). The relevance of international financial reporting standards to a developing country: Evidence from Kazakhstan. The International Journal of Accounting, 42(1), 82–110. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2006.12.004
  • Van Hulle, K. (2002). International convergence of accounting standards: A comment on Jeffrey. Duke Journal of Comparative International Law, 12, 357–363.
  • Véron, N. (2007). The global accounting experiment. Brussels: Bruegel.
  • Wagenhofer, A. (2014). Global convergence of accounting standards. In C. Van Mourik & P. Walton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to accounting, reporting and regulation (pp. 246–264). London: Routledge.
  • Walton, P. (2004). IAS 39: Where different accounting models collide. Accounting in Europe, 1(1), 5–16. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000262711
  • Walton, P. (2015). IFRS in Europe – An observer’s perspective of the next ten years. Accounting in Europe, 12(2), 135–151. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2015.1095306
  • Whittington, G. (2005). The adoption of international accounting standards in the European Union. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 127–153. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000338022
  • Whittington, G. (2008). Fair value and the IASB/FASB conceptual framework project: An alternative view. Abacus, 44(2), 139–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00255.x
  • Wingard, C., Bosman, J., & Amisi, B. (2016). The legitimacy of IFRS: An assessment of the influences on the due process of standard-setting. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(1), 134–156. doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2014-0032
  • Zeff, S. A. (2007). Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. The British Accounting Review, 39(4), 290–302. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2007.08.001
  • Zeff, S. A., & Nobes, C. W. (2010). Has Australia (or any other jurisdiction) ‘adopted’ IFRS? Australian Accounting Review, 20, 178–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00089.x
  • Zeff, S. A., & Nobes, C. W. (2016). Have Canada, Japan and Switzerland adopted IFRS? Australian Accounting Review, 26, 284–290. doi: 10.1111/auar.12131
  • Zimmerman, J., Werner, J. R., & Volmer, P. B. (2008). Global governance in accounting: Rebalancing public power and private commitment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.