Audit Market Response to PCAOB Censures of US Big 4 Firms

References

• Abbott, L., Gunny, K., & Zhang, T. (2013). When the PCAOB talks, who listens? Evidence from client firm reaction to GAAP-deficient PCAOB inspection reports of small audits. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(2), 1–31. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aobdia. (2016). The validity of publicly available measures of audit quality: Evidence from the PCAOB inspection data. Ssrn.com.
   Google Scholar
• Aobdia. (2018). The impact of the PCAOB individual engagement inspection process –preliminary evidence. The Accounting Review. Retrieved from http://aaajournals.org/doi/10.2308/accr-51948?code=aaan-site
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Wang, C. C. (2013). Learning and the disappearing association between governance and returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), 323–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M., & Mauldin, E. (2014). Who’s really in charge? Audit Committee versus CFO Power and Audit Fees. The Accounting Review, 89(6), 2057–2085. doi: 10.2308/accr-50834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, J., Khurana, I., & Raman, K. (2015). Did the 2007 PCAOB disciplinary order against Deloitte impose actual costs on the firm or improve its audit quality?. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 405–441. doi: 10.2308/accr-50867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocard, M., Franke, B., & Voeller, D. (2018). Enforcement actions and auditor changes. European Accounting Review, 27(3), 407–436. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2017.1307130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J., Hollingsworth, C., & Mastrolia, S. (2011). The effect of PCAOB inspections on Big 4 audit quality. Research in Accounting Regulation, 23, 85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.racreg.2011.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Center for Audit Quality (CAQ). (2012). A guide to PCAOB inspections. Washington, DC: The CAQ.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ceresney, A. (2016). The SEC enforcement division’s focus on auditors and auditing. https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/ceresney-enforcement-focus-on-auditors-and-auditing.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Francis, J., & Jiang, W. (2005). Investor learning about analyst predictive ability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.-H., Kim, J.-B., Liu, X., & Simunic, D. A. (2008). Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 1–49. doi: 10.1506/car.25.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, B., Glover, S., Omer, T., & Shelley, M. (2014). Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit partners and investors. SSRN.com.
   Google Scholar
• Church, B., & Shefchik, L. (2012). PCAOB inspections and large accounting firms. Accounting Horizons, 26(1), 43–63. doi: 10.2308/acch-50077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183–199. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
   Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Larson, C. (2011). Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, C., Lulseged, A., & Zhang, T. (2011). Client stock market reaction to PCAOB sanctions against a Big 4 auditor. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 263–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01044.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. (2010). How should the auditors be audited? Comparing the PCAOB inspections with the AICPA peer reviews. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 04–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., Erkens, D., & Zhang, J. (2016). Do client characteristic really drive the Big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Science, 63(11), 3628–3649. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., & Lennox, C. (2017). Do PCAOB Inspections improve the quality of internal control audits? Journal of Accounting Research, 55(June), 591–627. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12151
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., Lennox, C., & Zhang, J. (2017). Some controversies in the auditing literature. Paper presented at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) symposium.
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Lennox, C. S. (2011). The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 21–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, C., Knechel, W. R., & Moroney, R. (2018). Public oversight of audit firms: The slippery-slope of enforcing regulation. Abacus. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/abac.12130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, K. D., Goldman, N. C., & Lusch, S. J. (2016). Do Income Tax related deficiencies in publicly disclosed PCAOB Part II Reports influence Audit Client Financial Reporting of Income Tax Accounts? The Accounting Review, 91(5), 1411–1439. doi: 10.2308/accr-51338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., & Shadab, H. B. (2005). The focus of future PCAOB auditor inspections. CPA Journal, 75(6), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J., Maydew, E., & Sparks, H. (1999). The role of big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18, 17–34. doi: 10.2308/aud.1999.18.2.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., Philbrick, D., & Schipper, K. (1994). Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures.. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 137–164. doi: 10.2307/2491279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and Big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, 157–191. doi: 10.1506/car.25.1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, J., Prawitt, D., & Taylor, M. (2009). Audit standard setting and inspection for US public companies: A critical assessment and recommendations for fundamental change. Accounting Horizons, 23, 221–237. doi: 10.2308/acch.2009.23.2.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, I., Ormazabal, G., & Taylor, D. (2010). Correcting for cross-sectional and time-series dependence in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 487–512. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramling, A. A., Krishnan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2011). Are PCAOB-identified audit deficiencies associated with a change in reporting decisions of triennially inspected audit firms? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 59–79. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-10048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunny, K., & Zhang, T. (2013). PCAOB inspection reports and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(2), 136–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, R., & Stefaniak, C. (2013). Audit partner perceptions of post-audit review mechanisms: An empirical examination of internal quality reviews and PCAOB inspections. Accounting Horizons, 27(1), 23–49. doi: 10.2308/acch-50323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, G. (2013). Update on audit quality indicators. (December): Speech by PCAOB Office of Research and Analysis Director. PCAOB.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228. doi: 10.2307/2491047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpoff, J. (2012). Does reputation work to discipline corporate misconduct? In M. Barnett & T. Pollock (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation (pp. 361–382). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, B., & Leffler, K. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 615–641. doi: 10.1086/260996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsman, W., Nelson, K., & Rountree, B. (2009). Auditor switches in the pre- and post-Enron Eras: Risk or realignment? The Accounting Review, 84(2), 531–558. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmrose, Z. (1988). An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63, 55–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peecher, M., & Solomon, I. (2014). PCAOB’s ‘audit failure’ rate is highly suspect. CFO.com (February 27).
   Google Scholar
• Peecher, M., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. (2013). An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38, 596–620. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2011). Order instituting disciplinary proceedings, making findings, and imposing sanctions in the matter of price Waterhouse, Bangalore. April 5: Release No. 105-2011-002.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2013a). Standing Advisory Group Meeting. Discussion – Audit Quality Indicators. May 15-16. www.pcaobus.org.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2013b). Report from the Working Group on Audit Quality Indicators. October. www.pcaobus.org.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2013c). Audit Quality Indicators update. November 14, 2013. www.pcaobus.org.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, K., & Thompson, R. (1983). The impact of merger-related regulations on the shareholders of acquiring firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 184–221. doi: 10.2307/2490943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefcik, S., & Thompson, R. (1986). An approach to statistical inference in cross-sectional models with security abnormal returns as dependent variable. Journal of Accounting Research, 24, 316–334. doi: 10.2307/2491136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C. (1982). Consumer information, product quality, and seller reputation. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 20–35. doi: 10.2307/3003427
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, G. (1984). Rational expectations. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, S. (2000). Auditor resignations: Clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(2), 173–205. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00019-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. doi: 10.2307/2490397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, D. J., & Srinivasan, S. (2012). Audit quality and auditor reputation: Evidence from Japan. The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1737–1765. doi: 10.2308/accr-50198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundgren, S., & Svanstrom, T. (2017). Is the public oversight of auditors effective? The impact of sanctions on loss of clients, salary and audit reporting. European Accounting Review, 26(4), 787–818. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2016.1203345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1986). Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, J., Willenborg, M., & Zhang, J. (2008). Does auditor reputation matter? The case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4), 941–972. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838. doi: 10.2307/1912934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmijewski, M. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59–82. doi: 10.2307/2490859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar