The Impact of Management Control on Employee Motivation and Performance in the Public Sector

References

• Ahrens, T., & Chapman, T. S. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello, J. R. (1993). Computer-based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-Step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. S., & Speklé, R. F. (2018). Construct validity in survey-based management accounting and control research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 23–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. (2006). Motivation crowding and the federal civil servant: Evidence from the U.S. internal revenue service. International Public Management Journal, 9(1), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Birnberg, J. G., Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2007). Psychology theory in management accounting research. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), Handbook of management accounting research (Vol. 1 (pp. 113–135). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, P., & McInnes, M. (1986). Budgetary participation, motivation, and managerial performance. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 587–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerasoli, C. P., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, performance, and the mediating role of mastery goal orientation: A test of self-determination theory. The Journal of Psychology, 148(3), 267–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2012). The effects of preventive and detective controls on employee performance and motivation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(2), 432–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courty, P., & Marschke, G. (2011). Measuring government performance: An overview of dysfunctional responses. In J. J. Heckman, C. J. Heinrich, P. Courty, G. Marschke, & J. Schmith (Eds.), The performance of performance standards (pp. 203–230). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
   Google Scholar
• de Baerdemaeker, J., & Bruggeman, W. (2015). The impact of participation in strategic planning on managers’ creation of budgetary slack: The mediating role of autonomous motivation and affective organisational commitment. Management Accounting Research, 29, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, T. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic enlightenment. Public Administration, 87(4), 892–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14(2), 370–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 79–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. (2012). Crowding out and crowding in of intrinsic preferences. In E. Brousseau, T. Dedeurwaerdere, & B. Siebenhuener (Eds.), Reflexive governance for global public goods (pp. 75--83). Cambridge: MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., Homberg, F., & Osterloh, M. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organization Studies, 34(7), 949–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611. §.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M. H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgellis, Y., Iossa, E., & Tabvuma, V. (2011). Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 473–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2015). Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 489–521.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, B. A. C., Wouters, M. J. F., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2012). Why do employees take more initiatives to improve their performance after co-developing performance measures? A field study. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 120–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen, B. A. C., Wouters, M. J. F., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2017). Employee participation, performance metrics, and job performance: A survey study based on self-determination theory. Management Accounting Research, 36, 51–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, T. L., & Merchant, K. A. (2000). Control of international joint ventures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(6), 579–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. (2016). Realising the richness of psychology theory in contingency-based management accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 31, 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., & Miller, P. (2012). Rethinking impact and redefining responsibility: The parameters and coordinates of accounting and public management reforms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25(2), 295–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruis, A.-M., Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2016). The levers of control framework: An exploratory analysis of balance. Management Accounting Research, 32, 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, A. H., & Pfaff, D. (2002). Agency theory, performance evaluation, and the hypothetical construct of intrinsic motivation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(3), 275–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, J., & Linder, S. (2012). Organizational control and work effort – another Look at the Interplay of rewards and motivation. European Accounting Review, 21(3), 591–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. G. L. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J., & Shields, M. D. (2003). Mapping management accounting: Graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 169–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, V. S., & Matejka, M. (2009). Balancing the dual responsibilities of business unit controllers: Field and survey evidence. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1233–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, K. A. (1982). The control function of management. Sloan Management Review, 23(4), 43–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merchant, K. A., & van der Stede, W. A. (2007). Management control systems (2nd ed.). Edinburgh Gate, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, N., & Hatcher, L. (2013). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Brière, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The sport motivation scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A., & Recascino Wise, L. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management Reform - A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn!. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 343–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simons, R. (1995). Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 80–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The use of performance measurement systems in the public sector: Effects on performance. Emerging Issues in Performance Measurement, 25(2), 131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. S. K. (2018). Challenging issues in survey research: Discussion and suggestions. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, E., & Zecher, C. (2013). Management control systems: A review. Journal of Management Control, 23(4), 233–268.
   Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H. J. (2008). Management accounting change and new public management in local government: A reassessment of ambitions and results? An institutionalist approach to accounting change in the Dutch public sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(3), 209–241.
   Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H. J., van Helden, G. J., & van der Kolk, B. (2015). Challenging the NPM ideas about performance management - selectivity and differentiation in outcome-oriented performance budgeting. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(3), 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessier, S., & Otley, D. (2012). A conceptual development of Simons’ levers of control framework. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 171–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, B. (2016). Management control packages in public sector organizations. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, B., & Kaufmann, W. (2018). Performance measurement, cognitive dissonance and coping strategies: Exploring individual responses to NPM-inspired output control. Journal of Management Control, 29(2), 93–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, B., ter Bogt, H. J., & van Veen-Dirks, P. M. G. (2015). Constraining and facilitating management control in times of austerity: Case studies in four municipal departments. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(6), 934–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Stede, W. A. (2011). Management accounting research in the wake of the crisis: Some reflections. European Accounting Review, 20(4), 605–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. I. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• van Helden, G. J. (1998). A review of the policy and management instruments project for municipalities in the Netherlands. Financial Accountability and Management, 14(2), 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• van Helden, G. J., & Jansen, E. P. (2003). New public management in Dutch local government. Local Government Studies, 29(2), 68–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hengel, H., Budding, T., & Groot, T. (2014). Loosely coupled results control in Dutch municipalities. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(1), 49–74.
   Google Scholar
• van Veen-Dirks, P. (2010). Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 141–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations: Impact on performance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427–454.
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widener, S. K. (2004). An empirical investigation of the relation between the use of strategic human capital and the design of the management control system. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3–4), 377–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 757–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar