Exploring the Role of Management Control Anchor Practices in new Product Development

References

• Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1997). Management control systems in research and development organizations: The role of accounting, behavior and personnel controls. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(3-4), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00038-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00059-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abernethy, M. A., & Lillis, A. M. (1995). The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(4), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)E0014-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. (2011). Combining creativity and control: Understanding individual motivation in large-scale collaborative creativity. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(2), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, T. (2018). Management controls that anchor other organizational practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 58–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271–302. https://doi.org/10.1506/VJR6-RP75-7GUX-XH0X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2006). Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Farjoun, M. (2015). Dynamic conservatism: How institutions change to remain the same. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 44, 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20150000044005
   Google Scholar
• Barros, R. S., & Ferreira, A. M. D. S. d. C. (2019). Bridging management control systems and innovation. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 16(3), 342–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-05-2017-0043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berhausen, N. P., & Thrane, S. (2018). Control and coordination of design-driven innovation processes: Case evidence from the automotive industry. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(3), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnberg, J. G. (1988). Discussion of “An empirical analysis of the expenditure budget in research and development”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 4(2), 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1988.tb00686.x
   Google Scholar
• Bisbe, J., & Malagueño, R. (2009). The choice of interactive control systems under different innovation management modes. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 371–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180902863803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(8), 709–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, P. (1985). Budgetary systems and the control of functionally differentiated organizational activities. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 502–512. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkland, S., Zachariassen, F., & Oliveira, J. (2019). Meeting up for management control: Bracketing interaction in innovation development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 16(1), 144–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-06-2017-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Wall, M., & Kraus, K. (2010). Target costing in inter-organisational relationships and networks. In H. Håkansson, K. Kraus, & J. Lind (Eds.), Accounting in networks (pp. 198–224). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Wall, M., & Kraus, K. (2015). Opening the black box of the role of accounting practices in the fuzzy front-end of product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 45, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Wall, M., & Kraus, K. (2018). Accounting, cross-company negotiations and time-based compromises – a case study of product innovation. In M. Carlsson-Wall, H. Håkansson, K. Kraus, J. Lind, & T. Strömsten (Eds.), Accounting, innovation and inter-organisational relationships (pp. 130–139). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Wall, M., Kraus, K., & Lind, J. (2009). Accounting and distributed product development. IMP Journal, 3, 2–27.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Wall, M., Kraus, K., & Lind, J. (2015). Strategic management accounting in close inter-organisational relationships. Accounting and Business Research, 45(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.965128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2015). The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christner, C. H., & Strömsten, T. (2015). Scientists, venture capitalists and the stock exchange: The mediating role of accounting in product innovation. Management Accounting Research, 28, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial control and the construction of a relevant accounting. Management Accounting Research, 16(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, E., & Sweeney, B. (2017). Managing different types of innovation: Mutually reinforcing management control systems and the generation of dynamic tension. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1255585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, A. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, A., & Ditillo, A. (2017). Management control systems for creative teams: Managing stylistic creativity in fashion companies. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, A., Foster, G., & Oyon, D. (2009). Accounting and control, entrepreneurship and innovation: Venturing into new research opportunities. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180902731455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditillo, A. (2004). Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: The role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3-4), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditillo, A. (2012). Designing management control systems to foster knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: A network-based approach. European Accounting Review, 21(3), 425–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2012.661939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, O., & Pierce, B. (2018). Accounting and new product development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 15(2), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-05-2017-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Goretzki, L., Mack, S., Messner, M., & Weber, J. (2018). Exploring the persuasiveness of accounting numbers in the framing of ‘performance’ - A micro-level analysis of performance review meetings. European Accounting Review, 27(3), 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2016.1262273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goretzki, L., & Messner, M. (2016). Coordination under uncertainty: A sensemaking perspective on cross-functional planning meetings. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13(1), 92–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-09-2015-0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. C. (1977). The contingency theory of managerial accounting. The Accounting Review, 52(1), 22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri, J.-F., & Wouters, M. (in press). Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.101073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, B., & Messner, M. (2009). Management control in new product development: The dynamics of managing flexibility and efficiency. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2009.21.1.99
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, B., & Messner, M. (2010). Accounting and strategising: A case study from new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukka, K., & Modell, S. (2010). Validation in interpretive management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukka, K., & Vinnari, E. (2014). Domain theory and method theory in management accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(8), 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, K., & Van-der-Stede, W. (2012). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. (2016). Does industry matter? How industry context shapes management accounting practice. Management Accounting Research, 31, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1988). Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 280–308. https://doi.org/10.5465/256549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & O'Leary, T. (2007). Mediating instruments and making markets: Capital budgeting, science and the economy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 701–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, J. (2015). Special issue on innovation and product development. Management Accounting Research, 28, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, T., & Empson, L. (1998). Organisation and expertise: An exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting and consulting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5-6), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00032-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, J., Hansen, A., & Hansen, CØ. (2001). Inter-organizational controls and organizational competencies: Episodes around target cost management/functional analysis and open book accounting. Management Accounting Research, 12(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2001.0160
   Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, J., Hansen, A., & Hansen, CØ. (2009). Short and long translations: Management accounting calculations and innovation management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6-7), 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revellino, S., & Mouritsen, J. (2009). The multiplicity of controls and the making of innovation. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 341–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180802681529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revellino, S., & Mouritsen, J. (2015). Accounting as an engine: The performativity of calculative practices and the dynamics of innovation. Management Accounting Research, 28, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (1991). The possibilities of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90027-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockness, H. O., & Shields, M. D. (1984). Organizational control systems in research and development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(84)90005-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockness, H. O., & Shields, M. D. (1988). An empirical analysis of the expenditure budget in research and development. Contemporary Accounting Research, 4(2), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1988.tb00685.x
   Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A. (2001). What anchors cultural practices. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 74–92). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meer-Kooistra, J., & Scapens, R. W. (2015). Governing product co-development projects: The role of minimal structures. Management Accounting Research, 28, 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghootkar, K., & Gil, N. (2012). The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments. International Journal of Project Management, 30(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar