Budgeting in Public Organizations: The Influence of Managerial and Political Aspects

References

• Adam, B., & Behm, C. (2006). The use of budget reforms to modernize governance in German local government. Public Money and Management, 26(4), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00528.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque, A. (2009). Peer firms in relative performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, K. (2020). Evil geniuses: The unmaking of America: A recent history. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Anessi-Pessina, E., Barbera, C., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Public sector budgeting: A European review of accounting and public management journals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(3), 491–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2013-1532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antle, R., & Smith, A. (1986). An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. Journal of Accounting Research, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490802
   Google Scholar
• Apostolou, N. G., Giroux, G. A., & Welker, R. B. (1985). The information content of municipal spending rate data. Journal of Accounting Research, 853–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490842
   Google Scholar
• Aranda, C., Arellano, J., & Davila, A. (2014). Ratcheting and the role of relative target setting. The Accounting Review, 89(4), 1197–1226. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranda, C., Arellano, J., & Davila, A. (2017). Organizational learning in target setting. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L. (2013). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge (2nd ed.). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Azar, J., Duro, M., Kadach, I., & Ormazabal, G. (2021). The big three and corporate carbon emissions around the world. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. (2005). Professional accounting standards and the public sector – a mismatch. Abacus, 41(2), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. (2011). Why governments should use the government finance statistics accounting system. Abacus, 47(4), 411–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawn, K., & Rosenbluth, F. (2006). Short versus long coalitions: Electoral accountability and the size of the public sector. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00182.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., & Lowery, D. (1987). Understanding United States government growth: An empirical analysis of the postwar era. Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff, I., & Gohout, W. (2010). The political economy of tax projections. International Tax and Public Finance, 17(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-008-9103-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizjak, J. M., Lemmon, M. L., & Naveen, L. (2008). Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation? Journal of Financial Economics, 90(2), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., Blake, D., & Dion, S. (1993). Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, J. C., Keune, T. M., Matsumura, E. M., & Shin, J. Y. (2010). Supervisor discretion in target setting: An empirical investigation. The Accounting Review, 85(6), 1861–1886. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.6.1861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, J. C., & Lill, J. B. (2015). Performance target revisions in incentive contracts: Do information and trust reduce ratcheting and the ratchet effect? The Accounting Review, 90(5), 1755–1778. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwens, J., & Kroos, P. (2011). Target ratcheting and effort reduction. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwens, J., & Kroos, P. (2017). The interplay between forward-looking measures and target setting. Management Science, 63(9), 2868–2884. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2013). What organization theorists and public policy researchers can learn from one another: Publicness theory as a case-in-point. Organization Studies, 34(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612473549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1977). Towards a tax constitution for leviathan. Journal of Public Economics, 8(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(77)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (1980). The power to tax: Analytic foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunarski, K. R., Campbell, T. C., & Harman, Y. S. (2015). Evidence on the outcome of say-on-pay votes: How managers, directors, and shareholders respond. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., Rossi, F. M., & Aversano, N. (2015). Drivers for the financial condition of local government: A comparative study between Italy and Spain. Lex Localis, 13(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.4335/13.2.161-184(2015)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brülhart, M., & Jametti, M. (2019). Does tax competition tame the leviathan? Journal of Public Economics, 177, 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1977). Why does government grow? In T. E. Borcherding (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats: The sources of government growth (Vol. 3, pp. 13). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977). Democracy in deficit: The political legacy of Lord Keynes. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. R. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. The American Political Science Review, 72(4), 1243–1261. https://doi.org/10.2307/1954537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas-Arce, P., Holzhacker, M., Mahlendorf, M. D., & Matějka, M. (2018). Relative performance evaluation and the ratchet effect. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(4), 1702–1731. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B. H., Kim, S. J., & Merchant, K. A. (2013). Firms’ commitment to mitigate the ratchet effect under annual bonus plans with multiple performance measures. AAA.
   Google Scholar
• Craw, M. (2008). Taming the local leviathan: Institutional and economic constraints on municipal budgets. Urban Affairs Review, 43(5), 663–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087407311588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusack, T. R. (1997). Partisan politics and public finance: Changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955–1989. Public Choice, 91(3), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004995814758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Janvry, A., Finan, F., & Sadoulet, E. (2012). Local electoral incentives and decentralized program performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3), 672–685. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, D. A., Lovett, J., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2014). Partisan priorities and public budgeting. Political Research Quarterly, 67(4), 864–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914550045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., & Stapleton, P. (2012). The logics of budgeting: Theorization and practice variation in the educational field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(5), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkender, M., & Yang, J. (2010). Inside the black box: The role and composition of compensation peer groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galli, E., & Rossi, S. P. (2002). Political budget cycles: The case of the Western German Länder. Public Choice, 110(3), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013089504557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B. (2017). Does strategic planning ‘work’ in public organizations? Insights from Flemish municipalities. Public Money and Management, 37(7), 527–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1372116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M., Merchant, K. A., Van der Stede, W. A., & Vargus, M. E. (2004). Determinants and effects of subjectivity in incentives. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 409–436. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, G., & Shields, D. (1993). Accounting controls and bureaucratic strategies in municipal government. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 12(3), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(93)90029-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, G., Li, L. Y., & Shin, J. Y. (2011). Relative performance evaluation and related peer groups in executive compensation contracts. The Accounting Review, 86(3), 1007–1043. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, R. A., & Mehay, S. L. (1985). Bureaucracy and the divisibility of local public output. Public Choice, 45(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (2006). Why governmental accounting and financial reporting is – and should be – different (White Paper).
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2014). Give and take: Why helping others drives our success. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Grizzle, G. A. (1987). Linking performance to funding decisions: What is the budgeter's role? Public Productivity Review, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380085
   Google Scholar
• Grizzle, G. A., & Pettijohn, C. D. (2002). Implementing performance-based program budgeting: A system-dynamics perspective. Public Administration Review, 62(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., Reichard, C., & Ruggiero, P. (2016). Appropriateness and use of performance information in the budgeting process: Some experiences from German and Italian municipalities. Public Performance and Management Review, 39(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. K. (2011). PBB in American local governments: It's more than a management tool. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02359.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcombe, R. G. (2006). Public sector economics: The role of government in the American economy. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams. The Bell Journal of Economics, 324–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003457
   Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1987). Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 303–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913238
   Google Scholar
• Holzhacker, M., Kramer, S., Matějka, M., & Hoffmeister, N. (2019). Relative target setting and cooperation. Journal of Accounting Research, 57(1), 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Lunsford, R. S., Sides, K. C., & Jones, K. A. (2011). State performance-based budgeting in boom and bust years: An analytical framework and survey of the states. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2010). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, D. S., & Arrighi, J. T. (2015). ‘Keeping pandora's (ballot) box half-shut’: A comparative inquiry into the institutional limits of external voting in EU member states. Democratization, 22(5), 884–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.979161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indjejikian, R. J., Matějka, M., Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2014). Earnings targets and annual bonus incentives. The Accounting Review, 89(4), 1227–1258. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indjejikian, R. J., & Nanda, D. (2002). Executive target bonuses and what they imply about performance standards. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 793–819. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. G. (2008). Does more (or even better) information lead to better budgeting? A new perspective. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. G. (2011). The Obama administration and PBB: Building on the legacy of federal performance-informed budgeting? Public Administration Review, 71(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kido, N., Petacchi, R., & Weber, J. (2012). The influence of elections on the accounting choices of governmental entities. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 443–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. S., & Yang, J. (2010). Beating the target: A closer look at annual incentive plans (Unpublished Working Paper). Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lago-Peñas, I., & Lago-Peñas, S. (2008). Explaining budgetary indiscipline: Evidence from Spanish municipalities. Public Finance and Management, 8(1), 36–69.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (1988a). Capital budgeting, public service organizations and UK government policy. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 7(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(88)90005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (1988b). Research in public sector accounting: An appraisal. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004618
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. M., & Plummer, E. (2007). Budget adjustments in response to spending variances: Evidence of ratcheting of local government expenditures. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 19(1), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2007.19.1.137
   Google Scholar
• Leone, A. J., & Rock, S. (2002). Empirical tests of budget ratcheting and its effect on managers’ discretionary accrual choices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00044-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Rice, T. W. (1985). Government growth in the United States. The Journal of Politics, 47(1), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebman, J. B., & Mahoney, N. (2017). Do expiring budgets lead to wasteful year-end spending? Evidence from federal procurement. American Economic Review, 107(11), 3510–3549. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Some like it non-financial … politicians’ and managers’ views on the importance of performance information. Public Management Review, 14(7), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.650054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano-Reina, G., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2020). Say on pay and executive compensation: A systematic review and suggestions for developing the field. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, J. A., & Silva, J. S. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangen, C., & Magnan, M. (2012). ‘Say on pay’: A wolf in sheep's clothing? Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(2), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2010.0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, E. M., & Shin, J. Y. (2006). An empirical analysis of an incentive plan with relative performance measures: Evidence from a postal service. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 533–566. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., & Grossi, G. (2017). Insights into performance-based budgeting in the public sector: A literature review and a research agenda. Public Management Review, 19(7), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1243810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. C., & Olson, M. (1998). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: The invisible hand and the use of force. In S. Borner & M. Paldam (Eds.), The political dimension of economic growth (pp. 38–73). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, T. J. (1999). Proposition 13 and its offspring: For good or for evil? National Tax Journal, 52(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2012). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Millsap, A. A., Hobbs, B. K., & Stansel, D. (2019). Local governments and economic freedom: A test of the Leviathan hypothesis. Public Finance Review, 47(3), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142118817909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1976). Public finance in theory and practice. McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C., & Strøm, K. (2000). Coalition governance in Western Europe: An introduction. In W. C. Müller & K. Strøm (Eds.), Coalition governments in Western Europe (pp. 1–31). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A., & Baekgaard, M. (2015). Performance information, blame avoidance, and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: Evidence from an experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 545–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. (1985). Searching for Leviathan: An empirical study. The American Economic Review, 75(4), 748–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson-Lidbom, P. (2008). Do parties matter for economic outcomes? A regression-discontinuity approach. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1037–1056. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C. (2008). Intrinsic motivation and incentives. American Economic Review, 98(2), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reck, J. L. (2001). The usefulness of financial and nonfinancial performance information in resource allocation decisions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00018-7
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80(1), 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. D. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review, 33(5), 903–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(89)90002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2013). Performance information use by politicians and public managers for internal control and external accountability purposes. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7–8), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Marin, G., Lozano-Reina, G., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., & Lucas-Perez, M. E. (2017). Say on pay effectiveness, corporate governance mechanisms, and CEO compensation alignment. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 20(4), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinkle, G. A. (2012). Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. Journal of Management, 38(1), 415–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2017). Public budgeting in search for an identity: State of the art and future challenges. Public Management Review, 19(7), 905–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1243809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steccolini, I. (2018). Accounting and the post-new public management: Re-considering publicness in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(1), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (1988). Economics of the public sector. WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D. H. (1988). The political economy of government domestic expenditure in the affluent democracies, 1960–80. American Journal of Political Science, 32(4), 1120–1150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga, L. G., & Veiga, F. J. (2007). Political business cycles at the municipal level. Public Choice, 131(1–2), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9104-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, C., Benito, B., & Bastida, F. (2013). Transparency and political budget cycles at municipal level. Swiss Political Science Review, 19(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellman, M., & VanLandingham, G. (2007). Performance-based budgeting in Florida. In P. de Lancer Julnes, F. S. Berry, M. P. Aristigueta, & K. Yang (Eds.), International handbook of practice-based performance management (pp. 321–338). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson, G. S. (2003). Controlling ‘uncontrollable’ agency-influenced spending in the United States. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(4), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120019227
   Google Scholar
• Wu, A. M., & Lin, M. (2012). Determinants of government size: Evidence from China. Public Choice, 151(1–2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9746-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. L. (1977). The municipal accounting maze: An analysis of political incentives. Journal of Accounting Research, 107–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490636
   Google Scholar