The Role of Management Controls in New Product Development: Codifying a Collective Source of Creativity

References

• Abernethy, M. A., & Stoelwinder, J. U. (1991). Budget use, task uncertainty, system goal orientation and subunit performance: A test of the ‘fit’hypothesis in not-for-profit hospitals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90008-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancori, B., Bureth, A., & Cohendet, P. (2000). The economics of knowledge: The debate about codification and tacit knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.2.255
   Google Scholar
• Baldessarelli, G., Stigliani, I., & Elsbach, K. D. (2022). The aesthetic dimension of organizing: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baralou, E., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). How is New organizational knowledge created in a virtual context? An ethnographic study. Organization Studies, 36(5), 593–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T., & Douglas, D. (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R. E., & Svejenova, S. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies (pp. 597–616). SAGE Publications Sage UK.
   Google Scholar
• Busco, C., & Quattrone, P. (2015). Exploring how the balanced scorecard engages and unfolds: Articulating the visual power of accounting inscriptions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1236–1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busco, C., & Quattrone, P. (2018). In search of the “Perfect One”: How accounting as a maieutic machine sustains inventions through generative ‘in-tensions’. Management Accounting Research, 39, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2017.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatori, E. (2008). Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms. Research Policy, 37(9), 1591–1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatori, E., Tamoschus, D., & Grabher, G. (2012). Knowledge transfer across projects: Codification in creative, high-tech and engineering industries. Management Learning, 43(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611426240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P., & Rebentisch, E. S. (2003). Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science, 49(9), 1180–1195. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1180.16564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Wall, M., Goretzki, L., Kraus, K., & Lind, J. (2021). Exploring the role of management control anchor practices in new product development. European Accounting Review, 30(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1763187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, M. (2000). The craft of thought: Meditation, rhetoric, and the making of images, 400-1200. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cetina, K. K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R. H., Hall, M., & Smith, D. (2013). Performance measurement, modes of evaluation and the development of compromising accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(4), 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, E., & Sweeney, B. (2017). Managing different types of innovation: Mutually reinforcing management control systems and the generation of dynamic tension. Accounting and Business Research, 47(3), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2016.1255585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (1997). A narrative approach to organization studies. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• D'Adderio, L. (2001). Crafting the virtual prototype: How firms integrate knowledge and capabilities across organisational boundaries. Research Policy, 30(9), 1409–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00159-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Adderio, L. (2003). Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/12.2.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Adderio, L. (2011). Artifacts at the centre of routines: Performing the material turn in routines theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(2), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741000024X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, A. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4-5), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00034-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, A. (2005). An exploratory study on the emergence of management control systems: Formalizing human resources in small growing firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, A., & Ditillo, A. (2017). Management control systems for creative teams: Managing stylistic creativity in fashion companies. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(3), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davila, A., Foster, G., & Li, M. (2009). Reasons for management control systems adoption: Insights from product development systems choice by early-stage entrepreneurial companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4), 322–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, J. (2010). [In] visible [in] tangibles: Visual portraits of the business élite. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditillo, A. (2004). Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: The role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D., & Tolboom, J. N. (2008). Creative organizing to enable organizational creativity. In J. Zhou & C .E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (1st ed., pp. 237–261). Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (1987). How institutions think. Syracuse UP.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & Nembhard, I. M. (2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00341.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, H., & Gerdin, J. (2015). Developing enabling performance measurement systems: On the interplay between numbers and operational knowledge. European Accounting Review, 24(2), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.918517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, B., & Whyte, J. (2009). Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations asepistemic objects’. Organization Studies, 30(1), 07–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608083014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, E. S. (1977). The mind's eye: Nonverbal thought in technology. Science, 197(4306), 827–836. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.197.4306.827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. sage.
   Google Scholar
• Friis, I., Hansen, A., & Vámosi, T. (2015). On the effectiveness of incentive pay: Exploring complementarities and substitution between management control system elements in a manufacturing firm. European Accounting Review, 24(2), 241–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.976055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. P. (1993). The textual approach: Risk and blame in disaster sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1465–1514. https://doi.org/10.5465/256819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. P., Topal, C., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Future-oriented sensemaking: Temporalities and institutional legitimation. In T. Hernes & S. Maitlis (Eds.), Process, sensemaking, and organizing (pp. 275–312). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goretzki, L., Strauss, E., & Wiegmann, L. (2018). Exploring the roles of vernacular accounting systems in the development of “enabling” global accounting and control systems. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(4), 1888–1916. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabner, I., & Moers, F. (2013). Management control as a system or a package? Conceptual and empirical issues. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri, J.-F., & Wouters, M. (2019). Interdependence of management control practices for product innovation: The influence of environmental unpredictability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 86, 101073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.101073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek, M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). The innovation marathon: Lessons from high technology firms. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, B., & Messner, M. (2009). Management control in new product development: The dynamics of managing flexibility and efficiency. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 21(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2009.21.1.99
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., Milde, J., & Cowan, R. S. (2017). Symbiont practices in boundary spanning: Bridging the cognitive and political divides in interdisciplinary research. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1387–1414. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertcher, Z., & Coslor, E. (2020). Boundary objects and the technical culture divide: Successful practices for voluntary innovation teams crossing scientific and professional fields. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618783875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001) Objectual practice knowledge as social order (pp. 97–112). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukka, K. (2014). Exploring the possibilities for causal explanation in interpretive research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(7), 559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D. (2006) An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets (p. 1). MIT Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., More, P. H., & Faraj, S. (2012). Transcending knowledge differences in cross-functional teams. Organization Science, 23(4), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGivern, G., Dopson, S., Ferlie, E., Fischer, M., Fitzgerald, L., Ledger, J., & Bennett, C. (2018). The silent politics of temporal work: A case study of a management consultancy project to redesign public health care. Organization Studies, 39(8), 1007–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617708004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miura, A., & Hida, M. (2004). Synergy between diversity and similarity in group-idea generation. Small Group Research, 35(5), 540–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496404264942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, J., Hansen, A., & Hansen, CØ. (2009). Short and long translations: Management accounting calculations and innovation management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6-7), 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., Mengis, J., & Swan, J. (2012). Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organization Science, 23(3), 612–629. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippa, M. C., & Petzold, K. (2002). Economic functions of management consulting firms-an integrative theoretical framework, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W., Morlidge, S., & Rouse, P. (2016). Evaluating the completeness and effectiveness of management control systems with cybernetic tools. Management Accounting Research, 33, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prencipe, A., & Tell, F. (2001). Inter-project learning: Processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms. Research Policy, 30(9), 1373–1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00157-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quattrone, P. (2009). Books to be practiced: Memory, the power of the visual, and the success of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1), 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quattrone, P. (2017). Embracing ambiguity in management controls and decision-making processes: On how to design data visualisations to prompt wise judgement. Accounting and Business Research, 47(5), 588–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2017.1320842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revellino, S., & Mouritsen, J. (2015). Accounting as an engine: The performativity of calculative practices and the dynamics of innovation. Management Accounting Research, 28, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H. J. (1997). Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scarbrough, H., Panourgias, N. S., & Nandhakumar, J. (2015). Developing a relational view of the organizing role of objects: A study of the innovation process in computer games. Organization Studies, 36(2), 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614557213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606071942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skilton, P. F., & Dooley, K. J. (2010). The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.45577886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmueller, W. E. (2000). Will new information and communication technologies improve the'codification'of knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(2), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.2.361
   Google Scholar
• Stigliani, I., & Ravasi, D. (2012). Organizing thoughts and connecting brains: Material practices and the transition from individual to group-level prospective sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1232–1259. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, K. L., & Makhija, M. V. (2006). The role of organizational controls in managing knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 41–74.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, M., & Roijmans, D. (2011). Using prototypes to induce experimentation and knowledge integration in the development of enabling accounting information. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 708–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01055.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, M., & Wilderom, C. (2008). Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 488–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar