The Effects of Relative Performance Information and Transparency on Knowledge Sharing and Productive Effort

References

• Anderson, C. D., Crowell, C. R., Sponsel, S. S., Clarke, M., & Brence, J. (1983). Behavior management in the public accommodations industry: A three-project demonstration. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 4(1–2), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v04n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. A., Kaplan, R. S., & Young, S. M. (2004). Management accounting (4th ed.). Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bartol, K. M., & Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900105
   Google Scholar
• Beach, S. R. H., & Tesser, A. (1995). Self-esteem and the extended self-evaluation maintenance model. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 145–170). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, M. (2015). What motivates knowledge sharing at NASA? NASA Knowledge Journal, 1, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, L., Fiolleau, K., & MacTavish, C. (2019). I know something you don’t know: The effect of relative performance information and individual performance incentives on knowledge sharing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 31(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C. (1997). Learning to cooperate. In C. Bicchieri, R. C. Jeffrey, & B. Skyrms (Eds.), The dynamics of norms (pp. 17–46). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. W., Newman, A. H., Stikeleather, B. R., & Waddoups, N. J. (2019). Performance feedback type and employees’ subsequent willingness to help other employees. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 31(3), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, J. C., & Leiby, J. (2022). Status motives and agent-to-agent information sharing. Review of Accounting Studies, 27(1), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09598-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/259038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: Theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4–5), 202–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., & Southwood, N. (2013). Explaining norms. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. J., Ferris, D. L., Heller, D., & Keeping, L. M. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of the frequency of upward and downward social comparisons at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. L., Fisher, J. G., Sooy, M., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2014). The effect of rankings on honesty in budget reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A., & Cabrera, E. F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602235001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, G., Masclet, D., & Villeval, M. C. (2014). The dark side of competition for status. Management Science, 60(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. M., & Coyte, R. (2014). The effects of incentive subjectivity and strategy communication on knowledge-sharing and extra-role behaviours. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. (W.), Hecht, G., Tafkov, I. D., & Towry, K. L. (2016). Vicarious learning under implicit contracts. The Accounting Review, 91(4), 1087–1108. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2012). The effects of preventive and detective controls on employee performance and motivation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(2), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01106.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Tayler, W. B., & Wood, D. A. (2016). Compensation or feedback: Motivating performance in multidimensional tasks. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, T., & Thorn, B. K. (1990). Discretionary databases: Theory, data, and implications. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 219–233). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.5.4.400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ditillo, A. (2004). Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: The role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3–4), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala, L., & Suentes, S. (2017). Transparency and cooperation in repeated dilemma games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 20(4), 755–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9517-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, S. M., & Tor, A. (2007). Rankings, standards, and competition: Task vs. scale comparisons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 900–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, K., Cools, M., & van den Abbeele, A. (2018). Status differences and knowledge transfer: The effect of incentives. The Accounting Review, 93(1), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, R. L., Krishnan, R., & Newman, A. H. (2008). The effects of disseminating relative performance feedback in tournament and individual performance compensation plans. The Accounting Review, 83(4), 893–913. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.4.893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, R. L., McPhee, G. P., Newman, A. H., & Tafkov, I. D. (2013). The effect of relative performance information on performance and effort allocation in a multi-task environment. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 553–575. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan, R. L., McPhee, G. P., Newman, A. H., & Tafkov, I. D. (2019). The informativeness of relative performance information and its effect on effort allocation in a multitask environment. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1607–1633. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, F., & Schreck, P. (2018). Rankings, performance, and sabotage: The moderating effects of target setting. European Accounting Review, 27(2), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2016.1244015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P. J., Festinger, L., & Lawrence, D. H. (1954). Tendencies toward group comparability in competitive bargaining. Human Relations, 7(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzhacker, M., Kramer, S., Matějka, M., & Hoffmeister, N. (2019). Relative target setting and cooperation. Journal of Accounting Research, 57(1), 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indjejikian, R. J. (1999). Performance evaluation and compensation research: An agency perspective. Accounting Horizons, 13(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.2.147
   Google Scholar
• Jaggi, B. (1976). Human resources are assets. Management Accounting, 57(8), 41–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K. (2010). The effects of incentives on information exchange and decision quality in groups. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2010.22.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., & Presslee, A. (2017). Tournament group identity and performance: The moderating effect of winner proportion. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordstrom, R., Lorenzi, P., & Hall, R. V. (1991). A review of public posting of performance feedback in work settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 11(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v11n02_07
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (1999). The perils of internal competition. Stanford Business Magazine, 68(1).
   Google Scholar
• Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1435–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207305536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2009a). The joint impact of achievement goals and performance feedback on information giving. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(3), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903058276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2009b). Low ranks make the difference: How achievement goals and ranking information affect cooperation intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1144–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presslee, C. A. (2014). The effects of reward type and relative performance information on budget slack and performance [Doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo]. UWSpace. http://hdl.handle.net/10012/8121
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, R. T. S., & Thakor, A. V. (1991). Cooperation versus competition in agency. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7(2), 248–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R. (2012). Self-presentation. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 542–570). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnieder, C. (2022). How relative performance information affects employee behavior: a systematic review of empirical research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 44(1), 72–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-11-2021-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreck, P. (2015). Honesty in managerial reporting: How competition affects the benefits and costs of lying. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. H. (2000). Assimilative and contrastive emotional reactions to upward and downward social comparisons. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 173–200). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Song, H., Tucker, A. L., Murrell, K. L., & Vinson, D. R. (2018). Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Science, 64(6), 2628–2649. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprinkle, G. B. (2000). The effect of incentive contracts on learning and performance. The Accounting Review, 75(3), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.3.299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (eds.). (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafkov, I. D. (2013). Private and public relative performance information under different compensation contracts. The Accounting Review, 88(1), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. Z. (2006). The effect of incentives on knowledge sharing in computer-mediated communication: An experimental investigation. Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2006.20.1.103
   Google Scholar
• Tedeschi, J. T. (1981). Impression management theory and social psychological research. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 181–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60227-0
   Google Scholar
• Tesser, A., & Smith, J. (1980). Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don’t always help the one you like. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(6), 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90060-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E., & Manstead, A. S. (1985). Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology: A useful dichotomy? Psychological Review, 92(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.1.59
   Google Scholar
• Towry, K. L. (2003). Control in a teamwork environment - The impact of social ties on the effectiveness of mutual monitoring contracts. The Accounting Review, 78(4), 1069–1095. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera-Munoz, S. C., Ho, J. L., & Chow, C. W. (2006). Enhancing knowledge sharing in public accounting firms. Accounting Horizons, 20(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.2.133
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. W. (2017). Recognizing the best: The productive and counterproductive effects of relative performance recognition. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 966–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikoff, M. B., Anderson, D. C., & Crowell, C. R. (1983). Behavior management in a factory setting: Increasing work efficiency. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 4(1–2), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v04n01_04
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Introductory econometrics. A modern approach. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar