Groves Mechanism vs. Profit Sharing for Corporate Budgeting – An Experimental Analysis with Preplay Communication

References

• Abbink, K., and Brandts, J., 2002. University of Nottingham and University of Barcelona; 2002, 24, Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. C., and Ponick, E., 2006. Kommunikation im Groves-Mechanismus – Ergebnisse eines Laborexperiments, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 58 (2006), pp. 89–120.
   Google Scholar
• Attiyeh, G., Franciosi, R., and Isaac, R. M., 2000. Experiments with the pivot process for providing public goods, Public Choice 102 (2000), pp. 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldenius, T., Dutta, S., and Reichelstein, S., 2007. Cost allocation for capital budgeting, The Accounting Review 82 (2007), pp. 837–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., and Datar, S. M., 1992. Optimal transfer pricing under postcontract information, Contemporary Accounting Research 8 (1992), pp. 329–352.
   Google Scholar
• Bochet, O., Page, T., and Putterman, L., 2006. Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60 (2006), pp. 11–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosig, J., Weimann, J., and Ockenfels, A., 2003. The effect of communication media on cooperation, German Economic Review 4 (2003), pp. 217–241.
   Google Scholar
• Budde, J., Göx, R. F., and Luhmer, A., 1998. Absprachen beim Groves-Mechanismus – eine spieltheoretische Untersuchung, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 50 (1998), pp. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bushman, R. M., Indjejikian, R. J., and Smith, A., 1995. Aggregate performance measures in business unit manager compensation: the role of intrafirm interpendencies, Journal of Accounting Research 33 (1995), pp. 101–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W., Hirst, M., and Shields, M. D., 1994. Motivating truthful subordinate reporting: an experimental investigation in a two-subordinate context, Contemporary Accounting Research 10 (1994), pp. 699–720.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W., Hirst, M., and Shields, M. D., 1995. The effects of pay schemes and probabilistic management audits on subordinate misrepresentation of private information: an experimental investigation in a resource allocation context, Behavioral Research in Accounting 7 (1995), pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W., Hwang, R. N.-C., and Liao, W., 2000. Motivating truthful upward communication of private information: an experimental study of mechanisms from theory and practice, Abacus 36 (2000), pp. 160–179.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, E. H., 1971. Multipart pricing of public goods, Public Choice 8 (1971), pp. 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. I., and Loeb, M., 1984. The Groves scheme, profit sharing and moral hazard, Management Science 30 (1984), pp. 20–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R., and Ross, T. W., 1989. Communication in the battle of the sexes game: some experimental results, Rand Journal of Economics 20 (1989), pp. 568–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R., and Ross, T. W., 1990. Selection criteria in cooperation games: some experimental results, The American Economic Review 80 (1990), pp. 218–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R., and Ross, T. W., 1994. "Alternative institutions for resolving coordination problems: experimental evidence on forward induction and preplay communication, in: J. Friedman (Ed.)". In: Problems of Coordination in Economic Activity. Boston, MA: Kluwer; 1994. pp. 129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Covaleski, M. A., Evans, J. H., Luft, J. L., and Shields, M. D., 2003. Budgeting research: three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration, Journal of Management Accounting Research 15 (2003), pp. 3–49.
   Google Scholar
• Crémer, J., 1996. Manipulation by coalitions under asymmetric information: the case of the Groves mechanism, Games and Economic Behavior 13 (1996), pp. 39–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash, R. K., Jennings, N. R., and Parkes, D. C., 2003. Computational mechanism design: a call to arms, IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 (2003), pp. 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., 1987. Cheap talk, coordination, and entry, Rand Journal of Economics 18 (1987), pp. 34–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., and Rabin, M., 1996. Cheap talk, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (1996), pp. 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., and Gächter, S., 2000. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments, The American Economic Review 90 (2000), pp. 980–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. G., Maines, L. A., Peffer, S. A., and Sprinkle, G. B., 2002. Using budgets for performance evaluation: effects of resource allocation and horizontal information asymmetry on budget proposals, budget slack, and performance, The Accounting Review 77 (2002), pp. 847–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohlich, N., and Oppenheimer, J., 1998. Some consequences of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiment, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35 (1998), pp. 389–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg, D., Narahari, Y., Foster, E., Kulkarni, D., and Tew, J. D., 2005. A Groves mechanism approach to decentralized design of supply chains, in:, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology (2005), pp. 330–337.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J., and Laffont, J.-J., 1979. On coalition incentive compatibility, The Review of Economic Studies 46 (1979), pp. 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, T., 1973. Incentives in teams, Econometrica 41 (1973), pp. 617–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, T., 1976. "Incentive compatible control of decentralized organizations". In: Ho, Y. C., and Mitter, S. K., eds. Directions in Large-Scale Systems – Many-Person Optimization and Decentralized Control. New York: Academic Press; 1976. pp. 149–185.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, T., and Loeb, M., 1979. Incentives in a divisionalized firm, Management Science 25 (1979), pp. 221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güth, W., Schmidtberger, R., and Schwarze, B., 1983. A theoretical and experimental analysis of bidding behavior in Vickrey-auction games, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 139 (1983), pp. 269–288.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. C., Otley, D. T., and Van der Stede, W. A., 2003. Practice developments in budgeting: an overview and research perspective, Journal of Management Accounting Research 15 (2003), pp. 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, M., Kriebel, C. H., and Raviv, A., 1982. Asymmetric information, incentives and intrafirm resource allocation, Management Science 28 (1982), pp. 604–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C., and Selten, R., 1988. A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, C., and Pfeiffer, T., 2003. Investitionsbudgetierung und Anreizprobleme: Ist der Groves- Mechanismus nur third-best? Zur Effizienz des Groves-Budgetierungsmechanismus, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 73 (2003), pp. 559–582.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, R. M., and James, D., 2000. Robustness of the incentive compatible combinatorial auction, Experimental Economics 3 (2000), pp. 31–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., 2003. Paying people to lie: the truth about the budgeting process, European Financial Management 9 (2003), pp. 379–406.
   Google Scholar
• Kamarei, H., and Morrison, C. C., 1990. Some experimental evidence regarding collusion, Atlantic Economic Journal 18 (1990), pp. 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kanodia, C., 1993. Participative budgets as coordination and motivational devices, Journal of Accounting Research 31 (1993), pp. 172–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karabuk, S., and Wu, S. D., 2005. Incentive schemes for semiconductor capacity allocation: a game theoretic analysis, Production and Operations Management 14 (2005), pp. 175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawagoe, T., and Mori, T., 2001. Can the pivotal mechanism induce truth-telling? An experimental study, Public Choice 108 (2001), pp. 331–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., and Wilson, R., 1982. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma, Journal of Economic Theory 27 (1982), pp. 245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, A. H., and Pfeiffer, T., 1999. Investitionsbudgetierung und implizite Verträge: Wie resistent ist der Groves-Mechanismus bei dynamischer Interaktion?, Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 51 (1999), pp. 203–223.
   Google Scholar
• Kutanoglu, E., and Wu, S. D., 2006. Incentive compatible, collaborative production scheduling with simple communication among distributed agents, International Journal of Production Research 44 (2006), pp. 421–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, M., and Magat, W. A., 1978. Soviet success indicators and the evaluation of divisional management, Journal of Accounting Research 16 (1978), pp. 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mookherjee, D., 2006. Decentralization, hierarchies, and incentives: a mechanism design perspective, Journal of Economic Literature 44 (2006), pp. 367–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. J., and Oyer, P., 2003. "Discretion in executive incentive contracts". University of Southern California and Stanford University; 2003, Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Nisan, N., and Ronen, A., 2001. Algorithmic mechanism design, Games and Economic Behavior 35 (2001), pp. 166–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, J., 1995. "Coordination problems". In: Kagel, J. H., and Roth, A. E., eds. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995. pp. 195–252.
   Google Scholar
• Osband, K., and Reichelstein, S. J., 1985. Information-eliciting compensation schemes, Journal of Public Economics 27 (1985), pp. 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichelstein, S. J., and Osband, K., 1984. Incentives in government contracts, Journal of Public Economics 24 (1984), pp. 257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sally, D., 1995. Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas, Rationality and Society 7 (1995), pp. 58–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T., 1966. The Strategy of Conflict, . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Tirole, J., 1986. Hierarchies and bureaucracies: on the role of collusion in organizations, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2 (1986), pp. 181–214.
   Google Scholar
• Van Huyck, J. B., Battalio, R. C., and Beil, R. O., 1990. Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure, The American Economic Review 80 (1990), pp. 234–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickrey, W., 1964. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders, The Journal of Finance 16 (1964), pp. 8–37.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, W. S., 1994. Discussion of ‘Motivating truthful subordinate reporting: an experimental investigation in a two-subordinate context’, Contemporary Accounting Research 10 (1994), pp. 721–734.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, W. S., and Bishop, R. A., 1990. An experimental study of incentive pay schemes, communication, and intrafirm resource allocation, The Accounting Review 65 (1990), pp. 812–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzman, M. L., 1976. The new Soviet incentive model, Bell Journal of Economics 7 (1976), pp. 251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, J., 2002. Internal capital markets and firm-level compensation incentives for division managers, Journal of Labor Economics 20 (2002), pp. S219–S262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y., and Matsubara, S., 2004. The effect of false-name bids in combinatorial auctions: new fraud in Internet auctions, Games and Economic Behavior 46 (2004), pp. 174–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar