Bifurcations in the evolutionary approach to multilateralizing trade policy

References

• Arellano, M., and S. R. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., and W. D. Hamilton. 1981. “The Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 211 (4489): 1390–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccini, L., and J. Urpelainen. 2014. “International Institutions and Domestic Politics: Can Preferential Trading Agreements Help Leaders Promote Economic Reform?” Journal of Politics 76 (1): 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagwell, K., and R. W. Staiger. 2001. “Domestic Policies, National Sovereignty, and International Economic Institutions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 519–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagwell, K., C. P. Bown, and R. W. Staiger. 2016. “Is the WTO Passé?” Journal of Economic Literature 54 (4): 1125–1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier, S. L., and J. H. Bergstrand. 2004. “Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements.” Journal of International Economics 64 (1): 29–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. 1987. “Politically Realistic Objective Functions and Trade Policy PROFs and Tariffs.” Economic Letters 24 (3): 287–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R. 2010. “Unilateral Tariff Liberalization.” The International Economy 14: 10–43.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J. 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2): 407–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, C. F. 2008. “Stata Tip 63: Modeling Proportions.” The Stata Journal 8 (2): 299–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlemann, M., and J.–E. Wesselhöft. 2014. “Estimating Aggregate Capital Stocks Using the Perpetual Inventory Method: A Survey of Previous Implementations and New Empirical Evidence for 103 Countries.” Review of Economics 65: 1–64.
   Google Scholar
• Beshkar, M. 2010. “Trade Skirmishes Safeguards: A Theory of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process.” Journal of International Economics 82 (1): 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R. W., and S. R. Bond. 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87 (1): 115–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boffa, M., and M. Olarreaga. 2012. “Protectionism During the Crisis: Tit-for-Tat or Chicken Games?” Economics Letters 117 (3): 746–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, S. R. 2002. “Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice.” Portuguese Economic Journal 1: 141–162.
   Google Scholar
• Bown, C. P., and B. M. Hoekman. 2008. “Developing Countries and Enforcement of Trade Agreements: Why Dispute Settlement Is Not Enough.” Journal of World Trade 42 (1): 177–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bown, C. P., and J. Pauwelyn. 2010. The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broda, C., N. Limão, and N. Weinstein. 2008. “Optimal Tariffs and Market Power: The Evidence.” American Economic Review 98 (5): 2032–2065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressman, R., and Y. Tao. 2014. “The Replicator Equation and Other Game Dynamics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (Suppl. 3): 10810–10817.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Benedictis, L., and L. Tajoli. 2007. “Openness, Similarity in Export Composition, and Income Dynamics.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 16 (1): 93–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devadoss, S. 2006. “Why do Developing Countries Resist Global Trade Agreements?” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 15 (2): 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Dluhosch, B., and D. Horgos. 2013. “(When) Does Tit-for-tat Diplomacy in Trade Policy Pay Off?” The World Economy 36 (2): 155–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dluhosch, B., and S. Krause. 2013. “Diversity and the Disinterest in Trade Liberalization: On the Prospects of Self-enforcing Cooperation.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 23 (2): 455–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenett, S. J., and A. Jara. eds. 2013. Building on Bali: A Work Program for the WTO. VoxEU.org ebook, December.
   Google Scholar
• Fudenberg, D., and E. Maskin. 1986. “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information.” Econometrica 54 (3): 533–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., H. Beladi, and R. Oladi. 2015. “North–South Trade Liberalization and Economic Welfare.” Review of Development Economics 19: 1006–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1995. “Trade Wars and Trade Talks.” Journal of Political Economy 103 (4): 675–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman, B. M., and P. C. Mavroidis. 2015. “Embracing Diversity and the Trading System.” World Trade Review 14 (1): 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, H., G. Maggi, and R. W. Staiger. 2010. “Trade Agreements as Endogenously Incomplete Contracts.” American Economic Review 100 (1): 394–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. 1986. “Reciprocity in International Relations.” International Organization 40 (1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laborde, D., and W. Martin. 2015. “Formulas for Failure? Were the Doha Tariff Formulas Too Ambitious for Success?” World Trade Review 14 (1): 45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. Z. 2003. Crimes and Punishments? Retaliation Under the WTO. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. Z. 2006. “Rulemaking Amidst Growing Diversity: A Club-of-Club Approach to WTO Reform and New Issue Selection.” Journal of International Economic Law 9 (4): 823–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.–S,. 2016. “The Long and Winding Road – Path Towards Facilitation of Development in the WTO: Reflections on the Doha Round and Beyond.” Law and Development Review 9 (2): 437–465.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, C. 1984. “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs.” World Politics 37 (1): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludema, R. D., and A. M. Mayda. 2013. “Do Terms-of-Trade Effects Matter for Trade Agreements? Theory and Evidence from WTO Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 (4): 1837–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magee, C. S. P., and S. P. Magee. 2008. “The United States Is a Small Country in World Trade.” Review of International Economics 16 (5): 990–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggi, G., and A. Rodríguez–Clare. 2007. “A Political–Economy Theory of International Trade Agreements.” American Economic Review 97 (4): 1374–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjit, S., B. Mandal, and S. Roy. 2014. “Trade Openness, Corruption and Factor Abundance: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel.” Review of Development Economics 18: 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Márquez–Ramos, L., I. Martínez–Zarzoso, and C. Suarez–Burguet. 2011. “Determinants of Deep Integration: Examining Socio-political Factors.” Open Economy Review 22 (3): 479–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., and W. Vergote. 2008. “On the Role of Retaliation in Trade Agreements.” Journal of International Economics 76 (1): 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, W. 1981. “Theoretical Considerations on Negotiated Tariff Adjustments.” Oxford Economic Papers 33 (1): 135–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard Smith, J. 1976. “Evolution and the Theory of Games: In Situations Characterized by Conflict of Interest, the Best Strategy to Adopt Depends on What Others Are Doing.” American Scientist 64 (1): 41–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nickell, S. 1981. “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects.” Econometrica 49 (6): 1417–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, M. A. 2006. “Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 314 (5805): 1560–1563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, C. S., and M. A. Ulubaşoğlu. 2016. “The Role of Endowments, Technology and Size in International Trade: New Evidence from Product-Level Data.” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 25 (7): 913–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaski, S. 2006. Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A., and A. M. Chammah. 1965. Prisoner's Dilemma: A Study in Conflict and Cooperation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2008. “Don't Cry for Doha.” Project Syndicate, August 4. Accessed 13 December 2016. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/don-t-cry-for-doha.
   Google Scholar
• Sally, R. 2008. Trade Policy, New Century: The WTO, FTAs and Asia Rising. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Sally, R. 2016. “Integrating Developing Countries into the Global Economy: The Role of the G8 and Global Governance.” In Securing the Global Economy: G8 Global Governance for a Post-Crisis World, edited by A. Freytag, J. J. Kirton, R. Sally, and P. Savona, 47–62. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, J. K., and H. Lee. 2016. “Outcome and Implications of the Nairobi Ministerial Conference.” KIEP Research Paper. World Economy Update 6 (9): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Windmeijer, F. 2000. “Moment Conditions for Fixed Effects Count Data Models with Endogenous Regressors.” Economics Letters 68 (1): 21–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar