References
- Arnstein S. (1969). A ladder of public participation. J Am Inst Plan, 35, 216–24
- Balazs CL, Morello-Frosch R. (2013). The three Rs: How community-based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance, and reach of science. Environ Justice, 6, 9–14
- Barnes R, Auburn T, Lea S. (2004). Citizenship in practice. Br J Soc Psychol, 43, 187–206
- Beresford P. (2002). User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation? Soc Pol Soc, 1, 99–105
- Beresford P. (2007). User involvement, research and health inequalities: Developing new directions. Health Soc Care Commun, 15, 306–12
- Borg M, Karlsson B, Kim HS. (2009). User involvement in community mental health services–principles and practices. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs, 16, 285–92
- Charmaz K. (1994). Discovering chronic illness: Using grounded theory. In: Glaser BG, ed. More grounded theory methodology: A reader. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 65–94
- Chinman M, George P, Dougherty RH, et al. (2014). Peer support services for individuals with serious mental illnesses: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv, 65, 429–41
- Cohen AN, Drapalski AL, Glynn SM, et al. (2013). Preferences for family involvement in care among consumers with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv, 64, 257–63
- Davidson L, Tse S. (2014). What it will take for recovery to flourish in Hong Kong? East Asian Arch Psychiatry, 24, 110–16
- Davies K, Gary M, Webb SA. (2014). Putting the parity into service-user participation: An integrated model of social justice. Int J Soc Welfare, 23, 119–27
- Dixon LB, Glynn SM, Cohen AN, et al. (2014). Outcomes of a brief program, REORDER, to promote consumer recovery and family involvement in care. Psychiatr Serv, 65, 116–20
- Eassom E, Giacco D, Dirik A, Priebe S. (2014). Implementing family involvement in the treatment of patients with psychosis: A systematic review of facilitating and hindering factors. BMH Open, 4, 1–11
- Faulkner A. (2012). Participation and service users involvement. In: Harper D, Thompson AR, eds. Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 39–54
- Hickey G, Kipping C. (1998). Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum. J Clin Nurs, 7, 83–8
- Kolstad A, Gjesvik N. (2014). Collectivism, individualism, and pragmatism in China: Implications for perceptions of mental health. Transcult Psychiatry, 51, 264–85
- Lam CS. (2014). Is more choice better? Some thoughts on autonomy and self-determination for people with psychiatric disabilities. Hong Kong J Occup Ther, 24, 2–5
- Lammers J, Happell B. (2003). Consumer participation in mental health services: Looking from a consumer perspective. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs, 10, 385–92
- Leung TTF, Lam BCL. (2014). Challenges of partnership with the mental health services users in service planning and management. Hum Serv Org Manag Leadership Governance, 38, 320–35
- Lloyd-Evans B, Mayo-Wilson E, Harrison B, et al. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness. BioMed Central Psychiatry, 14, 39–12
- McDaid S. (2009). An equality of condition framework for user involvement in mental health policy and planning: Evidence from participatory action research. Disabil Soc, 24, 461–74
- Mizock L, Russinova Z, Shani R. (2014). New roads paved on losses: Photovoice perspectives about recovery from mental illness. Qual Health Res, 24, 1481–91
- Ng RMK, Pearson V, Pang YW, et al. (2013). The uncut jade: Differeing views of the potential of expert users on staff training and rehabilitation programmes for service users in Hong Kong. Int J Soc Psychiatry, 59, 176–87
- Roe D, Davidson L. (2005). Destinations and detours of users' movement. J Ment Health, 14, 429–33
- Ryan SM, Jorm AF, Toumbourou JW, Lubman DI. (2015). Parent and family factors associated with service use by young people with mental health problems: A systematic review. Early Interv Psychiatr, 9, 433–46
- Song LY, Hsu ST. (2011). The development of the stages of recovery scale for persons with persistent mental illness. Res Soc Work Prac, 21, 572–81
- Storm M, Davidson L. (2010). Inpatients' and providers' experiences with user involvement in inpatient care. Psychiatr Q, 81, 111–25
- Storm M, Edwards A. (2013). Models of user involvement in the mental health context: Intentions and implementation challenges. Psychiatr Q, 84, 313–27
- Sun CTL. (2008). Themes in Chinese Psychology. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd
- Tambuyzer E, Pieters G, Van Aidenhove C. (2014). Patient involvement in mental health care: One size does not fit all. Health Expect, 17, 138–50
- Tambuyzer E, Van Audenhove C. (2013). Service user and family carer involvement in mental health care: Divergent views. Community Ment Health J, 49, 675–85. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10597-012-9574-2
- Tang J, Tse S. (2015). Examining user participation in mental health services in Hong Kong: A qualitative analysis using multiple methods. Paper presented at the 16th International Mental Health Conference, Gold Coast, Australia
- Tang J, Tse S, Davidson L. (2016). The big picture unfolds: Using photovoice to study user participation in mental health services. Int J Soc Psychiatr, 62, 696–707
- Tse S, Tang J, Kan A. (2015). Patient involvement in mental health care: Culture, communication and caution. Health Expect, 18, 3–7
- Wang CC. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women's health. J Womens Health, 8, 185–92
- Yang FG. (1992) Responsibilities and rights: Traditions in Chinese society. In: Peachey P, Kromkowski J, McLean G, eds. The place of the person in social life. Washington, DC: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 209–23
- Yeung YWE, Ng SM. (2011). Engaging service users and carers in health and social care education: Challenges and opportunities in the Chinese community. Soc Work Educ, 30, 281–98
- Yip KS. (2004). The empowerment model: A critical reflection of empowerment in Chinese culture. Soc Work, 49, 479–87