Accessible cell phone design: development and application of a needs analysis framework

References

• Anderson RH, Bikson TK, Law SA, Mitchell BM. Universal access to email: Feasibility and Societal Implications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Emiliani PL. Special needs and enabling technologies: An evolving approach to accessibility. In: C Stephanidis (ed) User Interfaces for All: Concepts, Methods, and Tools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001; 97-114.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 1997; IDEA 20: USC, Ch 33, Section 1401 (25) US.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson KB. Assisted living as a model of care delivery. In: Gamroth, L. M., et al. Enhancing autonomy in long-term care: Concepts and Strategies. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Yeager DM. Independent living: Perceptions, realities, and guide- lines. Activities, Adaptation, and Aging 1996; 20: 20–1.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler D, Namioka A. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers E. Diusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Jackson TL, Williges RC. User-centered design of telesup- port systems. Assistive Technology 2001; 13: 13–144.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. New York: Academic Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Stephanidis C, Salvendy D, Akoumianakis D, Arnold A, Bevan N, Dardailler D, Emiliani PL, Iakouidis I, Jenkins P, Karshmer A, Korn P, Marcus A, Murphy H, Oppermann C, Stary C, Tamura H, Tscheligi M, Veda H, Weber G, Ziegler J. Toward an information society for all: HCI challenges and R + D recom-mendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 1999; 11: 1 -28.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro JP. No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York, NY: Times Books (Random House), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Palen L, Salzman M. Beyond the handset: Designing for wireless communications usability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2002; 9: 9–125.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Editorial: The change in emphasis from people to person. Introduction to the special issue on assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 24–1.
   Google Scholar
• Yassi A, Cooper JE, Tate RB, Gerlach S, Muir M, Trottier J, Massey K. A randomized controlled trial to prevent patient lift and transfer injuries of health care workers. Spine 2001; 26: 26–1739.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S. Disability, injury and ergonomics intervention. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 23–805.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn JG, LeBlanc M, Mortola P. Measuring quality and performance of Assistive technology: results of a prospective monitoring program. Assistive Technology 1994; 6: 6–120.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens R. Last words on the (project) ight recording: A plea for user requirements. Requirements Engineering 1997; 2: 2–61.
   Google Scholar
• Card SK, Moran TP, Newell A. The Psychology of Human- Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster S. Overcoming the lack of screen space on mobile computers. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 2002; 6: 6–188.
   Google Scholar
• Chincholle D. Designing highly usable mobile services for small display devices. 15th Annual Conference of the Human-Computer Interaction Group of the British Computer Society. IHM-HCI 2001. Cepadues-Editions, 2001; pp. 225-6 Toulouse, France.
   Google Scholar
• Parks AM, Ward N. Case study: a safety and usability evaluation of two dierent carphone designs. International Journal of Vehicle Design 2001; 26: 26–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gilb T. Towards the engineering of requirements. Requirements Engineering 1997; 2: 2–165.
   Google Scholar
• Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H, Benyon D, Holland S, Carey T. Human-Computer Interaction. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Rosson MB, Carroll JM. Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chatzoglou PD, Macaulay LA. Requirements capture and analysis: A survey of current practice. Requirements Engineering 1996; 1: 1–75.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson JR, Corlett EN. Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Lane JP. Assessing consumer proles of 'ideal' assistive technologies in ten categories: An integration of quanti- tative and qualitative methods. Disability + Rehabilitation 1997; 19: 19–528.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus groups: Theory and practice.Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Leedy P. Practical Research, Planning and Design. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM. Future directions in assistive technology. In: MJ Scherer (ed) Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2002; pp. 269-279.
   Google Scholar