Effects on work resumption of a co-operation project in vocational rehabilitation. Systematic, multi-professional, client-centred and solution-oriented co-operation

References

• Socialstyrelsen. Samverkan för särskilt utsatta. Utvärdering av frivillig samverkan FRISAM (in Swedish) (The National Board of Health and Welfare, Co-operation for exposed persons). ORD&FORM, Uppsala 2001
   Google Scholar
• SOU. Rehabilitering till arbete. En reform med individen i centrum (in Swedish) (Swedish Government Official Report, Vocational rehabilitation. A reform with the individual in focus). Socialdepartementet, Stockholm 2000, no 78
   Google Scholar
• Regeringens proposition. Samverkan, socialförsäkringens ersättningsnivåer och administration, m.m. Parliamentary Publications, Stockholm 1996/97, (in Swedish) (Swedish Government Bill, Collaboration, social insurance benefit levels and administration etc.). no 63
   Google Scholar
• SOU. Egon Jönsson – en kartläggning av lokala samverkansprojekt inom rehabiliteringsområdet. Socialdepartementet, Stockholm 1996, (in Swedish) (Swedish Government Official Report, Egon Jönsson – a survey on local co-operation projects in the field of vocational rehabilitation). no 85
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist R, Grape O. Vocational rehabilitation of the socially disadvantaged long-term sick: Inter-organisational co-operation between welfare state agencies. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 1999; 1: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist R. Vocational Rehabilitation between Work and Welfare – the Swedish Experience. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 2003; 5: 69–92
   Google Scholar
• SOU. Handlingsplan för ökad hälsa i arbetslivet. Mål, ansvar och åtgärder med utgångspunkt från ett övergripande mål för människor i arbete. Socialdepartementet, Stockholm 2002, Del I Slutbetänkande (in Swedish) (Swedish Government Official Report, A plan of actions for increased health in working life). no 5
   Google Scholar
• Ovretveit J, Gustafson D. Evaluation of quality improvement programmes. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2002; 11: 270–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson B, Schuldt Haard U, Bergroth A, Selander J, Ekholm J. Improved cooperation in vocational rehabilitation with systematic rehabilitation group meetings. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 734–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson B, Bergroth A, Schüldt K, Ekholm J. Do Systematic Multiprofessional Rehabilitation Group Meetings Improve Efficiency in Vocational Rehabilitation?. Work 2005; 24: 279–290
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakobsson B, Schuldt U, Bergroth M, Kärrholm J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Utvärdering av Stockholmsprojektet: Rehabilitering i samverkan – slutrapport. Public Health Sciences, Stockholm 2000, (in Swedish) (Evaluation of the Stockholm Project: Rehabilitation in co-operation). no 31
   Google Scholar
• Selander J, Marnetoft S-U. Risk factors for disability pension among unemployed women on long-term sick leave. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1999; 22: 277–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riksförsäkringsverket Redovisar. Långvarigt sjukskrivna. Arbetslöshet och sammansatta riskfaktorer. NSIB, Stockholm 1996, (in Swedish) (The National Social Insurance Board Reports, Long-term sick leavers. Unemployment and compound risk factors) no 14
   Google Scholar
• Selander J, Marnetoft S-U, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: risk factors reviewed. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 704–712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond M F, O'Brien B, Stoddart G L, WTG. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2nd ed, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1997
   Google Scholar
• Nordström-Björverud G, Moritz U. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation of hospital employees with musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1998; 30: 31–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jakobsson B. Co-operation in Vocational Rehabilitation. Methods in multiprofessional intersectorial group meetings and their effects on employment. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 2004, [licentiate thesis] Available from: Karolinska Institutet, Section of Rehabilitation Medicine, Norrbacka Bldg., SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt M H. Collaboration improves the quality of care: methodological challenges and evidence from US health care research. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2001; 15: 47–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenkins G. Collaborative care in the United Kingdom. Primary Care 1999; 26: 411–422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultberg E-L, Lönnroth K, Allebeck P. Interdisciplinary collaboration between primary care, social insurance and social services in rehabilitation of people with musculoskeletal disorders: Effects on self-rated health and physical performance. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2005; 19: 115–124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marnetoft S-U, Selander J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Vocational rehabilitation – Early versus delayed. The effect of early vocational rehabilitation compared to delayed vocational rehabilitation among employed and unemployed, long-term sick-listed people. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1999; 22: 161–170
   Google Scholar
• Marnetoft S-U, Selander J. Long-term effects of early versus delayed vocational rehabilitation – A four-year follow-up. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 741–745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J, Marnetoft S-U, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. The process of vocational rehabilitation for employed and unemployed people on sick leave: employed people vs. unemployed people in Stockholm compared with circumstances in rural Jämtland, Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1998; 30: 55–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marnetoft S-U, Selander J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. The unemployed sick-listed and their vocational rehabilitation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1997; 20: 245–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riksförsäkringsverket Redovisar. Risk-frisk-faktorer – sjukskrivning och rehabilitering i Sverige. NSIB, Stockholm 1997, (in Swedish, summary in English) (The National Social Insurance Board Reports, Sickness absenteeism and vocational rehabilitation in Sweden). no 6
   Google Scholar
• Crepeau E. Three images of interdisciplinary team meetings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1994; 48: 717–722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark B, Kullberg C. Samverkan – Välfärdsstatens nya arbetsform. Studentlitteratur, Lund 1999, (in Swedish) (Co-operation – The new form of a welfare state).
   Google Scholar
• Riksförsäkringsverket Analyserar. Nybeviljade förtidspensioner. Utvecklingen av riskfaktorer under 1990-talet. NSIB, Stockholm 2004, (in Swedish) (The National Social Insurance Board Reports, Newly granted disability pensions. Development of risk factors during the 1990s). no 1
   Google Scholar
• Linder J, Schüldt K, Jansson K-Å, Ekholm J. Samverkan mellan psykiatri, ortopedi, rehabiliteringsmedicin och försäkringskassa – en möjlighet till bättre underlag för beslut?. 1999; 5: 52–60, (in Swedish) (Co-operation between psychiatry, orthopaedics, rehabilitation medicine and social insurance office – A possibility to better decision.making?). Socialmedicinsk tidskrift
   Google Scholar
• Bergendorff S, Lidwall U, Ljungberg D, Marklund S. Sickness Absenteeism and Vocational Rehabilitation in Sweden – A Summary, Riksförsäkringsverket Redovisar. NSIB, Stockholm 1997, Risk-frisk-faktorer, sjukskrivning och rehabilitering i Sverige (in Swedish) (The National Social Insurance Board Reports, Risk-well-factors, sicklisting and rehabilitation in Sweden). no 6
   Google Scholar