1,036
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Characteristics of assistive technology service delivery models: stakeholder perspectives and preferences

&
Pages 1461-1470 | Accepted 01 Jul 2005, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

References

  • Cook A, Hussey S. Assistive technology: Principles and practice. 2nd edition. Mosby, St. Louis, MO 2002
  • Deitz J C. Pediatric augmented mobility. Designing and using assistive technology, D Gray, L A Quatrano, M L Lieberman. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, Baltimore, MD 1998
  • Assistive technology connections: A summary of meeting the needs of Californians with disabilities. September, 2001, Alliance for technology access.
  • Cowan D M, Turner-Smith A R. The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: Equipping for life. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 62: 75–79
  • Cowan D M, Turner-Smith A R. The funding agencies' perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: Equipped for life. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 62: 2–6
  • Health Canada [Internet]. Ottawa, Canada; 2004 – [cited 2004 December 14]; Available from: http://www.hcc.gc.ca/medicare/home.htm.
  • Ringaert L A. The delivery of assistive technology viewed from the consumer perspective: Independent living considerations, University of Manitoba, 1997. unpublished
  • Craddock G, McCormack L. Delivering an AT service: A client-focused, social and participatory service delivery model in assistive technology in Ireland. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 160–170
  • Leonard C, Biggs H C. The delivery of equipment and home adaptations to people with disabilities in New Zealand: A review of an innovative model of service provision. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1996; 59: 583–585
  • Schoech D, Cavalier A, Hoover B. A model for integrating technology into a multi-agency community service delivery system. Assistive Technology 1993; 5: 11–23
  • Nochajski S M, Oddo C, Beaver K. Technology and transition: Tools for success. Technology and Disability 1999; 11: 93–101
  • Speziale H J, Carpenter D R. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadephia, PA 2003
  • Berg B L. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.4th ed. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA 2001
  • Burnard P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today 1991; 11: 461–466
  • Booth A, Ripat J. Identifying categories of need. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Annual Conference. Calgary, AlbertaCanada 2001
  • Scherer M J. The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 1–4
  • Hocking C. Function or feelings: Factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technology and Disability 1999; 11: 3–11
  • Wessels R, deWitte L, Andrich R. IPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision. Technology and Disability 2000; 13: 105–115
  • Bell P, Hinojosa J. Perception of the impact of assistive devices on daily life of three individuals with quadriplegia. Assistive Technology 1995; 7: 87–94
  • Scherer M J. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 439–448
  • deJonge D, Rodger S, Fitzgibbon H. Putting technology to work: Users' perspective on integrating assistive technology in the workplace. Work 2001; 16: 77–89
  • Scherer M J. Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities. 2nd ed. Brookline Books, Cambridge, MA 1996
  • Stern M, Restall G, Ripat J. The use of self-reflection to improve client-centred processes. Individuals in context: A practical guide to client-centred practice, G Fearing, J Clark. Slack Inc, Thorofare, NJ 2000
  • Jedeloo S, deWitte L P, Linssen B AJ, Schrijvers A JP. Client satisfaction with service delivery of assistive technology for outdoor mobility. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 550–557
  • Scherer M J. Matching person and technology (revised). Institute for Matching Person & Technology, Inc, Webster, NY 1998
  • Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. CAOT Publications, Ottawa, ON 1998
  • Price R H, Glickstein M, Horton D L, Sherman S J, Fazio R H. Principles of psychology 2nd ed. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL 1987
  • Riemer-Reiss M L. Applying Rogers' diffusion of innovations theory to assistive technology discontinuance. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling 1999; 30: 16–21
  • Lenker J A, Paquet V L. A review of conceptual models for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assistive Technology 2003; 15: 1–15
  • Louise-Bender Pape T, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: A review of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 5–20

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.