Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: One-year follow-up

References

• Stuart A, Xia S, Jiang Y, Jiang T, Kalinowski J, Rastatter M P. Self-contained in-the-ear device to deliver altered auditory feedback: Applications for stuttering. Ann Biomed Engineering 2003; 31: 233–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A, Kalinowski J, Rastatter M P, Saltuklaroglu T, Dayalu V N. Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: Initial fitting and four-month follow-up. Int J Lang Communic Dis 2004; 39: 93–113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J. Self-reported efficacy of an all in-the-ear-canal prosthetic device to inhibit stuttering during one hundred hours of university teaching: A case study. Disab Rehab 2003; 25: 107–111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J, Guntupalli V K, Stuart A, Saltuklaroglu T. Self-reported efficacy of an ear-level prosthetic device that delivers altered auditory feedback for the management of stuttering. Int J Rehab Res 2004; 27: 167–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley G D. Stuttering severity instrument for children and adults3rd ed. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1994
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). American National Standards Institute, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for audiologic screening. American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville Pike, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Armson J, Stuart A. Effect of extended exposure to frequency altered feedback on stuttering during reading and spontaneous speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 479–490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measure 1960; 20: 37–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss J L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1981
   Google Scholar
• Littell R C, Milliken G A, Stroup W W, Wolfinger R D. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC 1996
   Google Scholar
• Woolf G. The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance, and expectancy. Br J Dis Communic 1967; 2: 158–171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart A, Kalinowski J. The perception of speech naturalness of post-therapeutic and altered auditory feedback speech of adults with mild and severe stuttering. Folia Phoniatrica Logopaed 2004; 56: 347–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R R, Haroldson S K, Triden K A. Stuttering and speech naturalness. J Speech Hear Disord 1984; 49: 53–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shrout P E, Fleiss J L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psycholog Bull 1979; 86: 420–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss J L. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Keppel G, Wickens T D. Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook4th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2004
   Google Scholar
• Keppel G, Zedeck S. Data analysis for research design. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Hargrave S, Kalinowski J, Stuart A, Armson J, Jones K. Effect of frequency-altered feedback on stuttering frequency at normal and fast speech rates. J Speech Hear Res 1994; 37: 1313–1319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalinowski J, Armson J, Roland-Mieszkowski M, Stuart A, Gracco V L. Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency. Lang Speech 1993; 36: 1–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J, Stuart A, Sark S, Armson J. Stuttering amelioration at various auditory delays and speech rates. Eur J Disord Communic 1996; 31: 259–269
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLeod J, Kalinowski J, Stuart A, Armson J. Effect of single and combined altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency at two speech rates. J Communic Dis 1995; 28: 217–228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A, Mendez C, Kalinowski J. Effect of frequency altered feedback on stuttering duration and type. Presented at the 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention. San Diego, CA 18 Nov, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Howell P, El-Yaniv N, Powell D J. Factors affecting fluency in stutterers. Speech motor dynamics in stuttering, H FM Peters, W Hulstijin. Springer-Verlag, New York 1987; 361–369
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski J, Stuart A, Wamsley L, Rastatter M P. Effect of monitoring condition and altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 1347–1354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A, Kalinowski J, Armson J, Stenstrom R, Jones K. Fluency effect of frequency alterations of plus/minus one-half and one-quarter octave shifts in auditory feedback of people who stutter. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 396–401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart A, Kalinowski J, Rastatter M P. Effects of monaural and binaural altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency. J Acoustical Soc Am 1997; 101: 3806–3809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Borsel J, Reunes G, Van Den Bergh N. Delayed auditory feedback in the treatment of stuttering: Clients as consumers. Int J Lang Communic Dis 2003; 38: 119–129, 2003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloodstein O. A handbook on stuttering5th ed. Singular, San Diego 1995
   Google Scholar
• Dewar A, Dewar A D, Austin W TS, Brash H M. The long term use of an automatically triggered auditory feedback masking device in the treatment of stuttering. Br J Dis Communic 1979; 14: 219–229
   Google Scholar
• Johnson W. Measurements of oral reading and speaking rate and disfluency of adult male and female stutterers and nonstutterers. J Speech Hear Dis Monogr 1961; 7: 1–20
   Google Scholar
• Silverman F H. Disfluency behavior on elementary-school stutterers and nonstutterers. Lang Speech Hear Serv in Schools 1974; 5: 32–37
   Google Scholar
• Blood I M, Hood S B. Elementary school-aged stutterers' disfluencies during oral reading and spontaneous speech. J Fluency Dis 1978; 3: 155–165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber S F, Martin R R. The effects of white noise on the frequency of stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1974; 17: 73–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garber S F, Martin R R. Effects of noise and increased vocal intensity on stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20: 223–240
   Google Scholar
• Martin R R, Haroldson S K. Effects of five experimental treatments on stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1979; 31: 272–274
   Google Scholar
• Martin R R, Johnson L J, Siegel G M, Haroldson S K. Auditory stimulation, rhythm, and stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 487–495
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin R R, Siegel G M, Johnson L J, Haroldson S K. Sidetone amplification, noise, and stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 518–527
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ingham R J, Moglia R A, Frank P, Costello-Ingham J, Cordes A. Experimental investigation of the effects of frequency altered feedback on the speech of adults who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40: 361–372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White C, Kalinowski J, Armson J. Clinicians' naturalness ratings of stutterers' speech under auditory feedback conditions. Asha 1995; 37(10)107
   Google Scholar