The Stroke Activity Scale: Results of a validity study

References

• Torenbeek M, Caulfield B, Garrett M, Van Harten W. Current use of outcome measures for stroke and low back pain rehabilitation in five European countries: First results of the ACROSS project. Int J Rehab Res 2001; 24: 95–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackley C M, Lincoln N B. Physiotherapy treatment for stroke patients: A survey of current practice. Physiother Theory Pract 1996; 12: 87–96
   Google Scholar
• Finn A M. Measurement in stroke. Physiother Ireland 1996; 17(2)13–15
   Google Scholar
• Daley K, Mayo N, Danys I, Cabot R, Wood-Dauphinee S. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): Refining and validating the content. Physiother Can 1997; 269–278
   Google Scholar
• Lennon S, Johnson L. The modified Rivermead Mobility Index. Disab Rehabil 2000; 22: 833–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan N F, Finn A M, O'Regan M, Cunningham C J. A new Stroke Activity Scale – results of a reliability study. Disab Rehabil 2003; 25(6)277–285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J H, Shepherd R B, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985; 65(2)175–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean C, Mackey F. Motor Assessment Scale scores as a measure of rehabilitation outcome following stroke. Aust J Physiother 1992; 38(1)31–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loewen S C, Andersen B A. Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther 1988; 68(7)1077–1081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole J L, Whitney S L. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: Concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 195–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: A comparison of the Fugl-Meyer assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1206–1212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewen S C, Anderson B A. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990; 21: 78–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307–310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai J W, Teasell R, Foley N C, Bitensky J. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Body Functions. Disab Rehabil 2005; 27(4)191–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. HSMO, London 1976
   Google Scholar
• Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980; 19: 382–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer A R, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post stroke hemiplegic patient: A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med 1975; 7: 13–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashburn A. A physical assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1982; 68(4)109–113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P W, Mayo N E. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: A guide to enhanced clinical decision making2nd ed. Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2002
   Google Scholar
• DeSouza L H, Ashburn A. Assessment of motor function in people with multiple sclerosis. Physio Res Int 1996; 1: 98–111
   Google Scholar
• Gladstone D J, Danells C J, Black S E. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16(3)232–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979; 65(2)48–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sackley C M, Lincoln N B. The verbal administration of the gross function scale of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Clin Rehab 1990; 4: 301–303
   Google Scholar
• Collen F M, Wade D T, Robb G F, Bradshaw C M. The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disab Stud 1988; 10: 64–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daley K, Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S. Reliability of scores of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) measure. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 8–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P W, Mayo N E, Gowland C, Mayo N. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. Produced by a working group convened by Health Services Directorate, Health Programs and Services Branch, Health Canada and theCanadian Physiotherapy Association. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreUSA 1995
   Google Scholar
• Wang C H, Hsieh C L, Dai M H, Chen C H, Lai Y F. Interrater reliability and validity of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) instrument. J Rehab Med 2002; 34: 20–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh I P, Ewang C H, Sheu C F, Hsieh C L. Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 1741–1745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Mayo N E, Higgins J, Salbach N M, Finch L, Wood-Dauphinee S L. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): A comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Phys Ther 2003; 83(7)617–630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryerson S, Levit K. Functional movement re-education: A contemporary model for stroke rehabilitation. Churchill Livingstone, New York 1997
   Google Scholar
• Carr J H, Shepherd R B. ‘Normal’ is not the issue: It is ‘effective’ goal attainment that counts. Behav Brain Sci 1996; 19(1)263–264
   Google Scholar