A participatory program evaluation of a systems change program to improve access to information technology by people with disabilities

References

• Shapiro R J, Rohde G L. Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. A report on American's access to technology tools. The Secretary of Commerce, Washington, DC 2000
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan D. Access to technology: Unique challenges for people with disabilities. Generations 1997; 21(3)24–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye H S. Computer and Internet use among people with disabilities. US Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC 2000, Disability Statistics Report (13)
   Google Scholar
• Burrows R, Nettleton S, Pleace N, Loader B, Muncer S. Virtual community care? Social policy and the emergence of computer mediated support. Information, Communication and Society 2000; 3(1)95–121
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie H, Blanck P. The promise of the Internet for disability: A study of on-line services and web site accessibility at Centers for Independent Living. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2003; 21: 5–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan B V, Drainoni M, Warner G, Nesathurai S, Wierbicky J, Williams S. The impact of Internet access for people with spinal cord injuries: A descriptive analysis of a pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25(8)422–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse D, Krueger A, Drastal S. Computer use, computer training and employment: Outcomes among people with spinal cord injuries. Spine 1996; 21(7)891–896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard S, Nelson J. Math, computers and the Internet: better employment opportunities for persons with disabilities. American Rehabilitation 2001; 26(1)9–14
   Google Scholar
• McKay H G, Feil E G, Glasgow R E, Brown J E. Feasibility and use of an internet support service for diabetes self-management. The Diabetes Educator 1998; 24(2)174–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy C E, Lash A T, Iverson M A, Dixon R S. Using the Internet to enable access to medical conferences. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 79(6)509–512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauber R P, Vesmarovich S, Dufour L. The use of computers and the Internet as a source of health information for people with disabilities. Rehabilitation Nursing 2002; 27(4)142–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenhart A, Horrigan J, Rainie L, Allen K, Boyce A, Madden M. The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look at Internet and the Digital Divide. The Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2003
   Google Scholar
• National Telecommunications and Information Administration and Economics and Statistics Administration. A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the internet, chap 7. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 2002
   Google Scholar
• Cameron P J, Graham J R, Sieppert J D. Computer technology utilization and community-based AIDS organizations. Journal of Technology in Human Services 2000; 17(2/3)103–118
   Google Scholar
• Schoech D, Cavalier A R, Hoover B. Using technology to change the human service delivery system. Administration in Social Work 1993; 17(2)31–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council on Disability. Access to the information superhighway and emerging information technologies by people with disabilities. National Council on Disability, Washington, DC 1996
   Google Scholar
• Charlton J. Nothing about us without us. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Harris L & Associates. Highlights of the N. O. D/Harris 1998 Survey of Americans with Disabilities. National Organization on Disability, Washington, DC 1998
   Google Scholar
• Ito M, Adler A, Linde C, Mynatt E, O'Day V. Broadening Access: Research for Diverse Network Communities, Available from: http://www.seniornet.org/php/default.php?PageID=5475 (accessed 3 April 2004)
   Google Scholar
• Russel M, Ginsburg L. Learning online: Extending the meaning of community. A review of three programs from the Southeastern United States. National Center on Adult Literacy Technical Report. 1998
   Google Scholar
• Lavato K. Technology helps seniors feel connected, Palo Alto Weekly 14, January1998. Available: http://www.paloaltoonline.com/weekly/morgue/monthly/; Principal Investigator: Dr. David Lansdale, www.linkags.net> (accessed 5 May 2004)
   Google Scholar
• SeniorNet Survey on Internet Use November 2000. Available: http://www.seniornet.org/php/default.php?PageID=6880 (accessed 3 April 2004)
   Google Scholar
• Nalm E. Exploring internet use among older adults. June, 2002, (accessed 3 April 2004)
   Google Scholar
• Masi C, Suarez-Balcazar Y, Cassey M, Kinney L, Piotrowski Z. Internet access and empowerment: A community-based health initiative. Journal of General and Internal Medicine 2003; 18: 525–530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm M, Mann W C, Tomita M R, Fraas L F, Stanton K M, Gitlin L. Computer and internet use in physically frail elders. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 2001; 19(3)15–32
   Google Scholar
• Kruger D J. Barriers to independence: A study of housing and personal assistance issues for people with disabilities residing in nursing homes. 2000, (available from: Center for Urban Research and Learning Loyola University & Access Living Chicago, IL)
   Google Scholar
• Balcazar F, Keys C, Kaplan D, Suarez – Balcazar Y. Participatory action research and people with disabilities: Principles and challenges. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1998; 12(2)105–112
   Google Scholar
• Suarez-Balcazar Y, Orellana-Damacela L, Portillo N, Sharma A, Lanum M. Implementing an outcomes model in the participatory evaluation of community initiatives. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community 2003; 26(2)5–20
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Nursing Home Data Compendium. 2001
   Google Scholar
• Sahyoun N R, Pratt L A, Lentzner H, Dey A, Robinson K N. The changing profile of nursing home residents: 1985 – 1997. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD 2001, Aging Trends; No. 4
   Google Scholar
• US Census Bureau. Census. Using American Factfinder. 2000, Available from: http://factfinder.census.gov (accessed 25 July 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Felce D. Defining and applying the concept of quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 1997; 41(2)126–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy. Encyclopedia of human behavior, V S Ramachaudran. Academic Press, New York 1998; 4: 71–81, (reprinted in Friedman H, editor. Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998)
   Google Scholar
• Hill T, Smith N D, Mann M F. Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies. Journal of Applied Psychology 1987; 72: 307–314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajkovic A D, Luthans F. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1998; 124: 240–261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casidy S, Eachus P. Developing the Computer Self-Efficacy (CSE) Scale: Investigating the relationship between CSE, gender and experience with computers. 2003, Available from: http://www.chssc.salford.ac.uk/healthSci/selfeff/SELFEFFa.htm (accessed 3 April 2004)
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Walens D. Life role development assessment. 1999, Available: University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• Patton M Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Clason D L, Dormody T J. Analyzing data measured by individual likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education 1994; 35(4)31–35
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter F, Wallnau J. Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences. 4th ed. Wadsworth, Pacific Grove 2002
   Google Scholar
• Depoy E, Gitlin L. Introduction to research. Understanding and applying multiple strategies. 2nd ed. Mosby, St. Louis, MO 1998
   Google Scholar