Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Sollerman hand function test in patients with chronic stroke

References

• Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M H. Motor control. Theory and practical applications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 2001
   Google Scholar
• Crawford J D, Medendorp W P, Marotta J J. Spatial transformations for eye-hand coordination. J Neurophysiol 2004; 92: 10–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney A G, Wing A, Thonnard J L, Smith A M. The cutaneous grip contribution to adaptive precision grip. Trends Neurosci 2004; 27(10)638–643
   Google Scholar
• Land M, Mennie N, Rusted J. The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception 1999; 28(11)1311–1328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson R S, Westling G, Backstrom A, Flanagan J R. Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J Neurosci 2001; 21(17)6917–6932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia-Mayer A, Caminiti R, Lacquaniti F, Zago M. Multiple levels of representation of reaching in the parieto-frontal network. Cereb Cortex 2003; 13(10)1009–1022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan J R, King S, Wolpert D M, Johansson R S. Sensorimotor prediction and memory in object manipulation. Can J Exp Psychol 2001; 55(2)87–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan J R, Vetter P, Johansson R S, Wolpert D M. Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol 2003; 13: 146–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B J, van der Grond J, Prevo A JH. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper extremity limb. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181–2186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H, Jorgensen H S, Raaschou H O, Olsen T S. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994; 75: 394–398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S, Lecraw D, Barton L, Jann B. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989; 104: 125–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle R C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehab Research 1981; 4: 483–492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp B, Kunkel A, Flor H, Platz T, Rose U, Mauritz K H, et al. The Arm Motor Ability Test: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1997; 78(6)615–620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr J H, Shepherd R B, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985; 65(2)175–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnell M, Sigge L, Westlin C, Lindmark B. Vidareutveckling och reliabilitetsprovning av modifierad Motor Assessment Scale enligt Uppsala Akademiska Sjukhus. Sjukgymnasten 1996; 12(Suppl. 3)32–37, [in Swedish]
   Google Scholar
• Barkelius K, Johansson A, Korm K, Lindmark B. Reliabilitets-och validitetsprovning av Modifierad Motor Assessment Scale enligt Uppsala Akademiska sjukhus-95. Nordisk Fysioterapi 1997; 1: 121–126, [in Swedish]
   Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer A R, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med 1975; 7: 13–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sollerman C, Ejeskar A. Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29(2)167–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomgren I, Blomqvist G, Ejeskar A, Fogdestam I, Volkman R, Edshage S. Hand function after replantation or revascularization of upper extremity injuries. A follow-up study of 21 cases operated on 1979 – 1985 in Goteborg. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1988; 22(1)93–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen B, Dahlin L B, Lundborg G. Assessment of functional outcome after nerve repair in a longitudinal cohort. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2000; 34(1)71–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellhag B, Burckhardt C S. Predictors of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8(1)16–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Connor D, Kortman B, Smith A, Ahern M, Smith M, Krishnan J. Correlation between objective and subjective measures of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Ther 1999; 12(4)323–329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moller K, Sollerman C, Geijer M, Kopylov P, Tagil M. Avanta versus swanson silicone implants in the mcp joint-a prospective, randomized comparison of 30 patients followed for 2 years. J Hand Surg [Br] 2005; 30(1)8–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draviaraj K P, Chakrabarti I. Functional outcome after surgery for Dupuytren's contracture: A prospective study. J Hand Surg [Am] 2004; 29(5)804–808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limaye V, Frankham A, Disney A, Pile K. Evaluation of hand function in patients undergoing long term haemodialysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60(3)278–280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogårdh C, Sjölund B H. Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in patients with stroke: A pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use. Clin Rehab 2006; 20: 218–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation – A clinical review. J Rehab Res Dev 1999; 36: 237–251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifer N M, Anderson K M, Arciniegas D B. Constraint-induced therapy for moderate chronic upper extremity impairment after stroke. Brain Injury 2005; 19(5)323–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss J L. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 1971; 76(5)378–382
   Google Scholar
• Altman D G. Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman & Hall, London 1991; 406–407
   Google Scholar
• Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: An illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehab 1998; 12(3)187–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout P E, Fleiss J L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420–428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton B B, Granger C V, . A uniform national system for medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation outcomes: Analysis and measurement, M J Fuhrer, et al. Brookes, Baltimore 1987; 137–147
   Google Scholar
• Morris D M, Uswatte G, Crago J E, Cook E W, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2001; 82(6)750–755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee J H. The intra rater reliability of the Action Research Arm test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2001; 82: 14–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson L, Stratford P, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther 1993; 73(7)447–454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasziw M, Young S L, Woodbury M G, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: Using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther 1994; 74(8)777–788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar