References
- Ward D E. Prescribing seating for wheeled mobility. Theory, application, and terminology. Health Wealth International, Kansas City, KS 1994
- Aminzadeh F, Edwards N. Factors associated with cane use among community dwelling older adults. Publ Health Nurs 2000; 17: 474–483
- Roelands M, Van Oos P, Buysse A, Depoorter A M. Awareness among community-dwelling elderly of assistive devices of mobility and self-care and attitudes towards their use. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54: 1441–1451
- Yeomans S G. The clinical application of outcomes assessment. Appleton & Lange, Stamford, CT 2000
- Fuhrer M. Assistive technology outcomes research: Impressions of an interested newcomer. Paper presented at the International Conference on Outcome Assessment in Assistive Technology, OsloNorway, 1999, Available online at: http://www.utoronto.ca/atrc/reference/atoutcomes/newcomer/index.html, accessed 19 July 2005
- Swedish Handicap Institute. Förskrivningsprocessen för hjälpmedel till personer med funktionshinder. Hjälpmedelsinstitutet, VällingbySweden 2000
- Swedish Handicap Institute. QUEST 2.0—ett utvärderingsinstrument för hjälpmedel. Hjälpmedelsinsitutet, VällingbySweden 2001, [In Swedish]
- Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Queec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology: QUEST. Assist Technol 1996; 8: 3–13
- Wessels R D, De Witte L P. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 267–272
- Demers L, Monette M, Lapierre Y, Arnold D L, Wolfson C. Reliability, validity and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with Multiple Sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 21–30
- Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B, De Witte L P. Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: a cross-validation of a Canadian measure in the Netherlands. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 187–191
- Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol 2000; 12: 96–105
- Demers L, Wessels R D, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B, De Witte L P. An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction and Assistive Technology (QUEST). Occup Ther Int 1999; 6: 159–175
- Wressle E, Samuelsson K. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther 2004; 11: 143–150
- Scherer M J. The impact of assistive technology on the lives of people with disabilities. Designing and using assistive technology: The human perspective, D G Gray, L A Quatrano, M L Lieberman. Paul H Brooks, Balitmore 1998
- Benedict R E, Lee J P, Marrujo S K, Farel A M. Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: Evaluating outcomes. Technol Disabil 1999; 11: 79–90
- Brandt Å, Iwarsson S, Ståhl A. Satisfaction with rollators among community-living users: A follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 343–353
- Edyburn D L, Smith R O. Creating an assistive technology outcomes measurement system: Validating the components. Assist Technol Outcomes and Benefits 2004; 1: 8–15
- World Health Organization (WHO). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. WHO, GenevaSwitzerland 2001
- Lee K R. Where does assistive technology fit in ICIDH-2?. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 636
- Stineman M. Assistive technology outcomes: Commodity or a therapy?. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 636
- McMillen A -M, Söderberg S. Disabled persons' experience of dependence on assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther 2002; 9: 176–183
- Edyburn D L. Measuring assistive technology outcomes: Key concepts. J Special Educ Technol 2003; 18: 53–55