References
- World Health Organization. WHODAS II. Disability Assessment Schedule Version 3.1.a. World Health Organization, Geneva 1999
- World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
- Engel G L. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129–136
- Chwastiak L A, Von Korff M. Disability in depression and back pain: evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 507–514
- van Tubergen A, Landewe R, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, van der Tempel H, van der Linden S. Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 140–145
- Chopra P K, Couper J W, Herrmann H. The assessment of patients with long-term psychotic disorders: application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II. Aust NZ J Psychiat 2004; 38: 753–759
- McKibbin C, Patterson T L, Jeste D V. Assessing disability in older patients with schizophrenia: results from the WHODAS-II. J Nerv Ment Dis 2004; 192: 405–413
- Chisolm T H, Abrams H B, McArdle R, Wilson R H, Boyle P J. The WHODAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss. Trends Amplif 2005; 9: 111–126
- Pickard A S, Johnson J A, Feeny D H, Shuaib A, Carriere K C, Nasser A M. Agreement between patient and proxy assessments of health-related quality of life after stroke using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Stroke 2004; 35: 607–612
- Duncan P W, Lai S M, Tyler D, Perera S, Reker D M, Studenski S. Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 2002; 33: 2593–2599
- Schlote A, Richter M, Wunderlich M T, Frank B, Poppendick U, Möller C, Wallesch C W. Der WHODAS II in der Anwendung bei Schlaganfallpatienten und ihren Angehörigen: Reliabilität und Inter-Rater-Reliabilität. Die Rehabilitation 2008; 47: 31–38
- Schlote A, Richter M, Frank B, Wallesch C W. A longitudinal study of Health Related Quality of Life of close relatives to first stroke survivors. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 22: 137–142
- Van Swieten J C, Koudstaal P J, Visser M C, Schouten H J, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988; 19: 604–607
- Brott T, Adams H P, Jr, Olinger C P, Marler J R, Barsan W G, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, Rorick M, Moomaw C J, Walker M. Measurement of acute cerebral infarction: a Clinical Examination Scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864–870
- Berge E, Fjaertoft H, Indredavik B, Sandset P M. Validity and reliability of simple questions in assessing short- and long-term outcome in Norwegian stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001; 11: 305–310
- Wirtz M, Caspar F. Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Hogrefe, Göttingen 2002
- Lienert G A, Raatz U. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Beltz, Weinheim 1998
- Segal M E, Gillard M, Schall R. Telephone and in-person proxy agreement between stroke patients and caregivers for the Functional Independence Measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 75: 208–212
- Evans R L. Prestroke family interaction as a predictor of stroke outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 508–512
- Clark P C, Dunbar S B, Shields C G, Viswanathan B, Aycock D M, Wolf S L. Influence of stroke survivor characteristics and family conflict surrounding recovery on caregivers mental and physical health. Nurs Res 2004; 53: 406–413
- United Nations. Decade of Disabled Persons 1983–1992. World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled Persons. United Nations, New York 1983