Selection of outcome measures in lower extremity amputation rehabilitation: ICF activities

References

• Condie E, Scott H, Treweek S. Lower limb prosthetic outcome measures: a review of the literature 1995 to 2005. J Prosthet Orthot 2006; 18: 13–45
   Google Scholar
• Deathe B, Miller W C, Speechley M. The status of outcome measurement in amputee rehabilitation in Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 912–918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Turner-Stokes T. The use of standardized outcome measures in rehabilitation centres in the UK. Clin Rehabil 1997; 11: 306–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein A R, Josephy B R, Wells C K. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 413–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Buijk C A. Use and usefulness of lower limb prostheses. Int J Rehabil Res 1988; 11: 361–367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin C, Collin J. Mobility after lower-limb amputation. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 1010–1011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommers G M, Vos L D, Groothoff J W, Eisma W H. Mobility of people with lower limb amputations: scales and questionnaires: a review. Clin Rehabil 2001; 15: 92–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise M-C. Tools for outcome measurement in lower limb amputee rehabilitation. 10th World Congress of the International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, GlasgowScotland, 2001, Institute de Readaption de Montreal, Quebec, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lusher A, Lefebvre C, Westby M. A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1625–1634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 212–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller W C. Falling, fear of falling and balance confidence among individuals with a lower limb amputation: prevalence and consequence. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Western Ontario, Ontario 2000
   Google Scholar
• McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press, New York, NY 1996
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise M-C. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1309–1314, 12:1309–1314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legro M W, Reiber G D, Smith D G, Del Aguila M, Larsen J, Boone D. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire for persons with lower limb amputations: assessing prosthesis-related quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 931–938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton A D, Taylor P R, Thurlow S, Rootes E, McColl I. Success rates for rehabilitation of vascular amputees: implications for preoperative assessment and amputation level. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 753–755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryall N H, Eyres S B, Neumann V C, Bhakta B B, Tennant A. The SIGAM mobility grades: a new population-specific measure for lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 833–844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind P, Carr-Hill R. The Nottingham health profile: a useful tool for epidemiologists. Soc Sci Med 1987; 25: 905–910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton M J, Jones D R. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: 1–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottenbacher K J, Hsu Y, Granger C V, Fiedler R C. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1226–1232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin M, Pauley T, Head K, Garfinkel S. Houghton scale of prosthetic use in people with lower-extremity amputations: reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1339–1344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hseuh I P, Lee M M, Hsieh C L. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc 2001; 100: 526–532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M V, Graves D E. Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: an introduction with application to spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31: 13–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun T B, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The international classification of functioning, disability and health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 565–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P W, Mayo N E. Rehabilitation outcome measures. A guide to enhanced clinical decision-making. Canadian Physiotherapy Association, Toronto, Ontario 2002
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M E, Marino R J. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(12 Suppl 2)S21–S29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle D L, Stratford P W. Interpreting validity indexes for diagnostic tests: an illustration using the Berg balance test. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 939–948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart J C, Lamping D L, Freeman J A, Langdon D W, McLellan D L, Greenwood R J, Thompson A J. Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation?. Neurology 2001; 57: 639–644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D T. Measurement in neurologic rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, New York 1992
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J W, Teasell R W. The necessity and limitations of evidence-based practice in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2003; 10: 71–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deathe A B, Miller W C. The L test of functional mobility: measurement properties of a modified version of the timed ‘up & go’ test designed for people with lower-limb amputations. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 626–635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller W C, Deathe A B, Harris J. Measurement properties of the Frenchay activities index among individuals with a lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 414–422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller W C, Deathe A B, Speechley M. Psychometric properties of the activities-specific balance confidence scale among individuals with a lower-limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 656–661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller W C, Deathe A B, Speechley M. Lower extremity prosthetic mobility: a comparison of 3 self-report scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1432–1440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff J W, De Vries J, Goeken L NH, Eisma W H. The timed ‘up and go’ test: reliability and validity in persons with unilateral lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 825–828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra A M, Fidler V, Eisma W H. Walking speed of normal subjects and amputees: aspects of validity of gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 78–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin C, Wade D T, Cochrane G M. Functional outcome of lower limb amputees with peripheral vascular disease. Clin Rehabil 1992; 6: 13–21
   Google Scholar
• Datta D, Ariyaratnam R, Hilton S. Timed walking test – an all-embracing outcome measure for lower-limb amputees?. Clin Rehabil 1996; 10: 227–232
   Google Scholar
• Ryall N H, Eyres S B, Neumann V C, Bhakta B B, Tennant A. Is the Rivermead Mobility Index appropriate to measure mobility in lower limb amputees?. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 143–152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks D, Hunter J P, Parsons J, Livsey E, Quirt J, Devlin M. Reliability of the two-minute walk test in individuals with transtibial amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1562–1565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks D, Parsons J, Hunter J P, Devlin M, Walker J. The 2-minute walk test as a measure of functional improvement in persons with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1478–1483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner M D, Faux S, Jones L E. Inter-observer reliability of clinical outcome measures in a lower limb amputee population. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 219–225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspal R S, Newman W P. Mobility grades in amputee rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 1991; 5: 344
   Google Scholar
• Granger C V, Albrecht G L, Hamilton B B. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 145–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann L. Evaluation of disability and of results of rehabilitation with the use of the Barthel index and Russek's classification. Int Disabil Stud 1987; 9: 68–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Toole D M, Goldberg R T, Ryan B. Functional changes in vascular amputee patients: evaluation by Barthel Index, PULSES profile and ESCROW scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 508–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traballesi M, Brunelli S, Pratesi L, Pulcini M, Angioni C, Paolucci S. Prognostic factors in rehabilitation of above knee amputees for vascular diseases. Disabil Rehabil 1998; 20: 380–384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traballesi M, Paolucci S, Luff R, Pratesi L, Brunelli S. Non-traumatic above-knee amputation in elderly patients. Eura Medicophys 1995; 31: 21–26
   Google Scholar
• Treweek S P, Condie M E. Three measures of functional outcome for lower limb amputees: a retrospective review. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998; 22: 178–185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds T A, Martin D P, Stolov W C, Deyo R A. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 531–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Orlandini D, Ferriero G, Moscato T A. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the locomotor capabilities index in adults with lower-limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 743–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung E CC, Rush P J, Devlin M. Predicting prosthetic rehabilitation outcome in lower limb amputee patients with the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 605–608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masedo A I, Hanley M, Jensen M P, Ehde D, Cardenas D D. Reliability and validity of a self-report FIM (FIM-SR) in persons with amputation or spinal cord injury and chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 167–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muecke L, Shekar S, Dwyer D, Israel E, Flynn J P. Functional screening of lower-limb amputees: a role in predicting rehabilitation outcome?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 851–858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panesar B S, Morrison P, Hunter J. A comparison of three measures of progress in early lower limb amputee rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2001; 2: 157–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman M G, Shea J A, Jette A, Tassoni C J, Ottenbacher K J, Fiedler R, Granger C V. The Functional independence measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1101–1108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaby L, Torrance G. Reliability of a physiotherapy functional assessment used in a rehabilitation setting. Physiother Can 1989; 41: 264–271
   Google Scholar
• Seaby L S, Torrance G M. Measurement properties of the physiotherapy clinical outcome variables (COVS): a mobility functional assessment. Physiother Can 1994; 46(2 Suppl)76
   Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Brunelli S, Orlandini D, Ferriero G, Traballesi M. Is the Rivermead Mobility Index a suitable outcome measure in lower limb amputees? – A metric validation study. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 141–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best K L, Kirby R L, Smith C, MacLeod D A. Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 2316–2323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby R L, Dupuis D J, MacPhee A H, Coolen A L, Smith C, Best K L, Newton A M, Mountain A D, Macleod D A, Bonaparte J P. The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 794–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain A D, Kirby R L, Smith C. The wheelchair skills test, version 2.4: validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 416–423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby R L, Swuste J, Dupuis D J, MacLeod D A, Monroe R. The wheelchair skills test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 10–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day H J. The assessment and description of amputee activity. Prosthet Orthot Int 1981; 5: 23–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailey R S, Roach K E, Applegate E B, Cho B, Cunniffe B, Licht S, Maguire M, Nash M S. The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 613–627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunelli S, Averna T, Porcacchia P, Paolucci S, Di M F, Traballesi M. Functional status and factors influencing the rehabilitation outcome of people affected by above-knee amputation and hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 995–1000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferriero G, Dughi D, Orlandini D, Moscato T, Nicita D, Franchignoni F. Measuring long-term outcome in people with lower limb amputation: cross-validation of the Italian versions of the prosthetic profile of the amputee and prosthesis evaluation questionnaire. Eura Medicophys 2005; 41: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise M, Lepage Y. The locomotor capabilities index: content validity. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas 1998; 2: 40–46
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise M C, Potvin D. Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 706–713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Branemark R, Hagg O. Questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation (Q-TFA): initial validity and reliability of a new outcome measure. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41: 695–706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt S D, Varni J W, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in children with limb deficiency: development and initial validation of an outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1233–1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield A G. Beyond the 10-m time: a pilot study of timed walks in lower limb amputees. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 210–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis W, Renton C J. Mobility after major limb amputation for arterial occlusive disease. Prosthet Orthot Int 1987; 11: 85–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton E A, Nichols P J. Rehabilitation of the elderly lower-limb amputee. Br Med J 1972; 2: 95–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm P, Engel T, Holm A, Kristiansen V B, Rosendahl S. Function after lower limb amputation. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57: 154–157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kegel B, Carpenter M L, Burgess E M. Functional capabilities of lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1978; 59: 109–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narang I C, Mathur B P, Singh P, Jape V S. Functional capabilities of lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1984; 8: 43–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohjolainen T, Alaranta H, Karkkainen M. Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990; 14: 75–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siriwardena G J, Bertrand P V. Factors influencing rehabilitation of arteriosclerotic lower limb amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991; 28: 35–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg F U, Sunwoo I, Roettger R F. Prosthetic rehabilitation of geriatric amputee patients: a follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 742–745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susak Z, Gaspar A, Najenson T. Arterial occlusive disease in amputee patients: assessment with the Doppler ultrasound flowmeter and correlation with rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980; 61: 269–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpicelli L J, Chambers R B, Wagner F W, Jr. Ambulation levels of bilateral lower-extremity amputees. Analysis of one hundred and three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983; 65: 599–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dittmar S S, Gresham G E. Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health professional. Aspen Publication, Inc., Gaithersburg, MarylandUSA 1997
   Google Scholar
• Granger C V, Hamilton B B, Keith R A. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986; 1: 59–74
   Google Scholar
• Stineman M G, Goin J E, Granger C V, Fiedler R, Williams S V. Discharge motor FIM-function related groups. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 980–985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stineman M G, Goin J E, Tassoni C J, Granger C V, Williams S V. Classifying rehabilitation inpatients by expected functional gain. Med Care 1997; 35: 963–973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelchair Skills Program. Internet. Electronic Citation. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova ScotiaCanada 2006, http://www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/. Last accessed December 2008
   Google Scholar
• Houghton A D, Allen A, Luff R, McColl I. Rehabilitation after lower limb amputation: a comparative study of above-knee, through-knee and Gritti-Stokes amputations. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 622–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt S D, Varni J W, Seid M, Setoguchi Y. Functional status in limb deficiency: development of an outcome measure for preschool children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 405–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt S D, Seid M, Varni J W, Setoguchi Y. Toddlers with limb deficiency: conceptual basis and initial application of a functional status outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 819–824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen E M. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(Suppl 2)S15–S20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss S E, Richardson W S, Glasziou P, Haynes R B. Evidence-based medicine. How to practice and teach EBM4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 2005
   Google Scholar
• Collen F M, Wade D T, Bradshaw C M. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 6–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyatt G H, Pugsley S O, Sullivan M J, Thompson P J, Berman L, Jones N L, Fallen E L, Taylor D W. Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax 1984; 39: 818–822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• vanHerk I EH, Arendzen J H, Rispens P. Ten-metre walk, with or without a turn?. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 30–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 306–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart D A, Burns J MA, Dunn S G, Roberts M A. The two-minute walking test: a sensitive index of mobility in the rehabilitation of elderly patients. Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 273–276
   Google Scholar