Factors affecting measures of activities and participation in persons with mobility impairment

References

• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva 2001
   Google Scholar
• Wee J YM. Adjusting expectations after spinal cord injury across global settings: a commentary. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 659–661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alander D H, Parker J, Shannon S E. Intermediate-term outcome of cervical spinal cord-injured patients older than 50 years of age. Spine 1997; 22: 1189–1192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem N R, McColl M A, King W, Smith K M. Aging with a spinal cord injury: factors associated with the need for more help with activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1567–1577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Boschen K A. Perceived influence of the environment on social participation among individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2002; 7: 56–72
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D. Effect of incongruence of acute myocardial infarction symptoms on the decision to seek treatment in a rural population. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2005; 20: 365–371
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosswurm M A. Nursing perspective on the health care of rural elders. Geriatr Nurs 2001; 22: 231–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney F I, Barthel D W. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wee J, Schwarz R. An international comparative study assessing impairment, activities, and participation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation – a pilot study. Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J 2004; 15: 43–53
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G G, Harrison-Felix C L, Mellick D C, Brooks C A, Charlifue S B, Gerhart K A. Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1324–1335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keysor J J, Jette A M, Haley S M. Development of the home and community environment (HACE) instrument. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 37–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson S A. Chapter 6, Grounded theory: the method. Nursing research: a qualitative perspective2nd ed., P L Munhall, C O Boyd. National League for Nursing Press, New York 1993; 180–212
   Google Scholar
• Folstein M F, Folstein S E, McHugh P R. Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell J. Designing a qualitative study. Handbook of applied social research methods, L Bickman, D J Rogers. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1997; 69–100
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J W. Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches2nd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2003; 18–21
   Google Scholar
• Morse J M. The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995; 5: 147–149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caracelli V J, Greene J C. Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1993; 15: 195–207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford P W, Mayo N E. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making2nd ed. Canadian Physiotherapy Association, BC Decker Incorporated, Toronto, ON 2002
   Google Scholar
• Wellwood I, Dennis M S, Warlow C P. A comparison of the Barthel index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke – UK office of population censuses and surveys. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 54–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valach L, Signer S, Hartmeier A, Hofer K, Steck G C. Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment and modified Barthel index self-assessment in patients with vascular brain damage. Int J Rehabil Res 2003; 26: 93–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Brakel W H, Anderson A M, Mutatkar R K, Bakirtzief Z, Nicholls P G, Raju M S, Das-Pattanayak R K. The participation scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 193–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee J, Paterson M. Chapter 3. Exploring how factors impact the activities and participation of persons with disability – constructing a model through grounded theory. Factors affecting activities and participation in persons with disabilities – informing models and measures [dissertation], J Wee. Queen's University, Kingston, ON 2007; 39–151, Electronic Citation. Library and Archives Canada, or Queen's University, Canada. https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/handle/1974/1242
   Google Scholar
• Wee J, Paterson M. Exploring how factors impact the activities and participation of persons with disability – constructing a model through grounded theory, The Qualitative Report. in press; 14(Number 1), Electronic Citation. http://www. nova.edu/ssss/QR/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Campbell D T, Fiske D W. Contingent and discriminant validation by multitrast-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959; 56: 81–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 702–709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?. Qual Res 2006; 6: 97–113
   Google Scholar
• Norris D. Issues in producing data for rural areas: a Canadian perspective. Paper presented at the First International Rural Aging Conference, , WV, 2000, (cited in Havens)
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Tate D, Charlifue S. Predicting community reintegration after spinal cord injury from demographic and injury characteristics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1485–1491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazer D G, Landerman L R, Fillenbaum G, Homer R. Health services access and use among older adults in North Carolina: urban vs. rural residents. Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 1384–1390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge F I, Lawson B, Johnston G. Where a cancer patient dies: the effect of rural residency. J Rural Health 2005; 21: 233–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart L G, Larson E H, Lishner D M. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 1149–1155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havens B, Stloukal L, Racher F, Norris D, Keefe J, Coppin A. Finding and using rural aging data: an international perspective. J Rural Health 2001; 17: 350–355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care. Measuring remoteness: accessibility/remoteness index of Australia (ARIA)revised edition. Occasional papers. AUS. 2001; 14: 1–19, Electronic Citation http://www.health. gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/content/health-pubs-hfsocc- ocpariew14a.htm/$FILE/ocpanew14.pdf. Last accessed 30 September 2005
   Google Scholar
• Ocana-Riola R, Sanchez-Cantalejo C. Rurality index for small areas in Spain. Soc Indic Res 2005; 73: 247–266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn P A. The impact of the housing environment upon the ability of disabled people to live independently. Disabil Handicap Soc 1990; 5: 37–52
   Google Scholar
• Boschen K A. Variables affecting independent living for persons with physical disabilities, final report. Human Resources Development Canada, Toronto, ON 1994
   Google Scholar
• Wee J. The social dimensions of human disability across global settings [abstract]. Proceedings of CCIH/CCGHR 13th Canadian Conference on International Health, Ottawa, ON
   Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Ustün T B, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 205–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray D B, Hollingsworth H H, Stark S L, Morgan K A. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 189–197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Rehabilitation Reporting System. Canadian Institute for Health Information, Electronic Citation. http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page = services_nrs_e. Last accessed 3 November 2008
   Google Scholar
• Meyers A R, Andresen E M. Enabling our instruments: accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 81(Suppl. 2)S5–S9
   Google Scholar