Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 39, 2017 - Issue 12
Submit an article Journal homepage
314
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assess Procedures

Referral decision support in patients with subacute brain injury: evaluation of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale – Extended

Asger R. PedersenHammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark; Correspondence[email protected]
,
Jørgen F. NielsenHammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark;
,
Jim JensenHammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Aarhus University, Hammel, Denmark;
&
Thomas MariboDepartment of Public Health, Rehabilitation Center Marselisborg, Section of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; ;DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
Pages 1221-1227 | Received 02 Dec 2015, Accepted 10 May 2016, Published online: 06 Jul 2016

References

  • WHO, World Health Organization. ICF – International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE clinical guideline 162. Stroke Rehabilitation: Long-term Rehabilitation After Stroke (clinical guideline CG162); 2013.
  • Wade D. Complexity, case-mix and rehabilitation: the importance of a holistic model of illness. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25:387–395.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Sutch S, Dredge R, et al. International casemix and funding models: lessons for rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26:195–208.
  • Wade DT, Smeets RJ, Verbunt JA. Research in rehabilitation medicine: methodological challenges. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:699–704.
  • Wade DT, Halligan PW. Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? BMJ. 2004;329:1398–1401.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Scott H, Williams H, et al. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale–extended version: detection of patients with highly complex needs. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:715–720.
  • Hoffman K, West A, Nott P, et al. Measuring acute rehabilitation needs in trauma: preliminary evaluation of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale. Injury. 2013;44:104–109.
  • Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, et al. AACVPR/ACCF/AHA 2010 update: performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services: a report of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Performance Measures for Cardiac Rehabilitation). J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2010;30:279–288.
  • Troigros O, Bejot Y, Rodriguez PM, et al. Measuring complexity in neurological rehabilitation: the Oxford Case Complexity Assessment Measure (OCCAM). Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:499–507.
  • Poulos CJ, Magee C, Bashford G, et al. Determining level of care appropriateness in the patient journey from acute care to rehabilitation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:291.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Disler R, Williams H. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale: a simple, practical tool to identify ‘complex specialised’ services in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Med. 2007;7:593–599.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Siegert RJ. The Rehabilitation Complexity Scale version 2: a clinimetric evaluation in patients with severe complex neurodisability. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:146–153.
  • Roda' F, Agosti M, Corradini E, et al. Cross-Cultural adaptation and preliminary test–retest reliability of the Italian version of the Complexity Rehabilitation Scale-Extended (13th Version). Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51:439–446.
  • Turner-Stokes L, Sutch S, Dredge R. Healthcare tariffs for specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation services: rationale and development of a UK casemix and costing methodology. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26:264–279.
  • Sundhedsstyrelsen. Forløbsprogram for rehabilitering af voksne med erhvervet hjerneskade. Sundhedsstyrelsen, København; 2011.
  • Curran C, Dorstyn D, Polychronis C, et al. Functional outcomes of community-based brain injury rehabilitation clients. Brain Inj. 2015;29:25–32.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.