References
- Bigot P, Croutte E. La diffusion des technologies de l ’ information et de la communication dans la société. Rapp réalisé à la demande du Cons Général des Technol l’Information (Ministère l’Economie, des Financ l’Emploi) l’Autorité Régulation des Commun Electron des Postes Cent Rech pour l’Etude l’O. 2013:220.
- Laffont I, Biard N, Bouteille J, et al. Tétraplégie: solutions technologiques de compensation des incapacités découlant de l’atteinte des membres supérieurs. La Lett médecine Phys réadaptation. 2008;24:113–121.
- Betke M, Gips J, Fleming P. The camera mouse: visual tracking of body features to provide computer access for people with severe disabilities. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2002;10:1–10.
- Dalton JR, Peterson CQ. The use of voice recognition as a control interface for word processing. Occup Ther Health Care. 1997;11:75–81.
- Koester HH, Levine SP. Effect of a word prediction feature on user performance. Augment Altern Commun. 1996;12:155–168.
- Lau C, Leary SO. Comparison of computer interface devices for persons with severe physical disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;47:1022–1030.
- DeVries RC, Deitz J, Anson D. A comparison of two computer access systems for functional text entry. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:656–665.
- Le Pévédic B. Prédiction Morphosyntaxique Évolutive HandiAS. Doctoral Thesis. Nantes, France: Ecole Doctorale Sciences de l'Ingénieur; 1997.
- Turpin G, Armstrong J, Frost P, et al. Evaluation of alternative computer input devices used by people with disabilities. J Med Eng Technol. 2005;29:119–129.
- MacKenzie IS, Zhang SX. The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum factors Comput Syst CHI is limit – CHI ’99. 1999:25–31.
- Raynal M, Vigouroux N. Genetic algorithm to generate optimized soft keyboard. CHI ’05 Ext Abstr Hum factors Comput Syst – CHI '05 [Internet]. 2005:1729. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1056808.1057008
- Kushler C. AAC using a reduced keyboard. Proc CSUN Conf Technol Pers with Disabil CSUN’98 Calif State Univ Nortridge CA. 2001.
- Harbusch. An evaluation an evaluation study of two button scanning with ambiguous keyboards. In: 7th Conference for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe, AATE’2003. Dublin, Ireland. 2003.
- Wandmacher T, Antoine J, Poirier F, et al. Sibylle, an assistive communication system adapting to the context and its user. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2008.
- Pouplin S, Roche N, Hugeron C, et al. Recommendations and settings of word prediction software by health-related professionals for people with spinal cord injury: a prospective observational study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015; article in press.
- Koester HH, Levine S. Keystroke-level models for user performance with word prediction. Augment Altern Commun. 1997;13:239–257.
- Fraval Lye M, Boutard C. Textzados. Ortho Edit. Isbergues; 2004.
- Koester HH. Effect of system configuration on user performance with word prediction result for users with disabilities. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 2000: June 28–July 2; RESNA Press; 2000.
- Guttmann L. Spinal cord injuries, comprehensive management and research. 1st ed. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK; 1973.
- Antoine J, Maurel D. Aide à la communication pour personnes handicapées et prédiction de texte Problématique, état des lieux et retour sur trente ans. TAL. 2007;48:9–46.
- Choi-Kwon S, Jong SK. Poststroke fatigue: an emerging, critical issue in stroke medicine. Int J Stroke. 2011;6:328–336.
- Anson D, Moist P, Przywara M, et al. The effects of word completion and word prediction on typing rates using on-screen keyboards. Assist Technol. 2006;18:146–154.