Collaborative goal setting with and for children as part of therapeutic intervention

References

• Brewer K, Pollock N, Wright FV. Addressing the challenges of collaborative goal setting with children and their families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34:138–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday RC, Ballinger C, Playford ED. Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: Patients' perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock N, Sharma N, Christenson C, et al. Change in parent-identified goals in young children with cerebral palsy receiving a context-focused intervention: associations with child, goal and intervention factors. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34:62–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol. 2002;57:705–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson A-M, Marcusson J, et al. Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:5–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné DE, Hoppes S. Brief report – the effects of collaborative goal-focused occupational therapy on self-care skills: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:215–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwing K, Bexelius A, Carlberg EB. Activity focused and goal directed therapy for children with cerebral palsy-do goals make a difference? Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1808–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsingdal S, St John W, Miller V, et al. Goal setting with mothers in child development services. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;40:587–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg L, Bart O, Ratzon NZ, et al. Complementary contribution of parents and therapists in the assessment process of children. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:410–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations [UN]. United nations convention on the rights of the child. Geneva: United Nations; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Costa U. Der KRAH®-Ansatz – Die vier Charakteristika der Ergotherapie. [The KRAH®-model: four characteristica of occupational therapy.]. Ergopraxis. 2011;4:22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Missiuna C, Pollock N. Perceived efficacy and goal setting in young children. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67:101–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Missiuna C, Pollock N, Law M. Perceived efficacy and goal setting system (PEGS). San Antonio TX: Psychological Corporation; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Costa U, Lindenthal M. Perceived competences in everyday activities: children’s self-report and parents’ and teachers’ report using the first Austrian-German PEGS (Perceived Efficacy and Goal Setting System) version. Int J Health Prof. 2015;2:16–30.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [WHO]. International classification of functioning, disability and health – children and youth version. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. An occupational perspective of health. 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Baum CM, Christiansen CH. Person-environment-occupation-performance: an occupation-based framework for practice. In: Christiansen CH, Baum CM, Bass-Haugen J, editors. Occupational therapy: performance, participation, and well-being. 3rd ed. Thorofare NJ: SLACK; 2005. p. 243–266.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Steinwender S, Leclair S. Occupation, health and well-being. Can J Occup Ther. 1998;65:81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Creek J. The core concepts of occupational therapy: a dynamic framework for practice. London: Jessica Kinsley Publisher; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen C. The 1999 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. Defining lives: occupation as identity: an essay on competence, coherence, and the creation of meaning. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:547–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:296–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stamm T, Cieza A, Machold K, et al. Exploring the link between conceptual occupational therapy models and the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Aust Occup Ther J. 2006;53:9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Costa U. KRAH® – Klientenzentrierung, Ressourcenorientierung, Alltagsrelevanz und Handlungsorientierung als Basis und Ausrichtung im ergotherapeutischen Prozess. [KRAH® – Client-centeredness, resource-orientation, day-to-day-life-relevance, and occupation-orientation as foundation and direction in the occupational therapy process.]. Ergotherapie. 2011;4:13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A, Franke A. Salutogenese: Zur Entmystifizierung der Gesundheit. [Salutogenesis: Unraveling the mystery of health.] Tübingen: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verhaltenstherapie; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Wright MZ. Partizipative Qualitätsentwicklung in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. [Participatory quality development in health promotion and prevention.] Bern: Verlag Hans Huber; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Costa U. Meaningful activity as health-promoting factor. Outcomes of KRAH®-based intervention. Ergoscience. 2014;9:46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Missiuna C, Pollock N, Law M, et al. Examination of the perceived efficacy and goal setting system (PEGS) with children with disabilities, their parents, and teachers. Am J Occup Ther. 2006;60:204–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel-Yeger B, Hanna Kasis A. The relationship between developmental co-ordination disorders, child´s perceived self-efficacy and preference to participate in daily activities. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36:670–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroland-Nordstrand K, Krumlinde-Sundholm L. The perceived efficacy and goal setting system (PEGS), part I: translation and cross-cultural adaptation to a Swedish context. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:497–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroland-Nordstrand K, Krumlinde-Sundholm L. The perceived efficacy and goal setting system (PEGS), part II: evaluation of test-retest reliability and differences between child and parental reports in the Swedish version. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:506–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunford C, Missiuna C, Street E, et al. Children’s perceptions of the impact of developmental coordination disorder on activities of daily living. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68:207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Costa U. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Perceived Efficacy and Goal Setting System (PEGS): results from the first Austrian-German PEGS version exploring meaningful activities for children. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2014;34:119–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures . Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick U. Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung. [Qualitative social research. An introduction]. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Costa U, Schönthaler E. Pediatric occupational therapy in Austria. J Occup Ther Sch Earl Interv. 2011;4:176–185.
   Google Scholar
• Harter S. Issues in the assessment of the self-concept of children and adolescents. In: La Greca AM, editor. Through the eyes of the child: obtaining self-reports from children and adolescents. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1990. p. 292–325.
   Google Scholar
• Tam C, Teachman G, Wright V. Paediatric application of individualised client-centred outcome measures: a literature review. Br J Occup Ther. 2008;71:286–296.
   Google Scholar
• Reed KD, Hocking C, Smythe L. Exploring the meaning of occupation: the case for phenomenology. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78:303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney J, Hay JA, Faught BE, et al. Developmental coordination disorder, generalised self-efficacy toward physical activity, and participation in organized and free play activities. J Pediatr. 2005;147:515–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Latham GP. New directions in goal-setting theory. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006;15:265–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Schunk DH. Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1981;41:586–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “What” and “Why” of Goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11:227–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunford C. Goal-orientated group intervention for children with developmental coordination disorder. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2011;31:288–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breuer D, Döpfner M. Die Erfassung von problematischen Situationen in der Familie. [The assessment of problem situations within the family]. Praxis Kinderpsychol Kinderpsych. 1997;46:583–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glattauer N. Der engagierte Lehrer und seine Feinde: zur Lage an Österreichs Schulen. [The engaged teacher and his/her enemies: the situation in Austrian schools]. Innsbruck, Wien: HaymonVerlag; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Costa U. Fähigkeiten und Möglichkeiten – Ausgangspunkte für Gesundheits-, Wachstums- und Entwicklungsförderung. Impulse aus der Ergotherapie für Kinder, Jugendliche und deren Bezugspersonen in Bezug zum Capability Approach nach Amartya Sen. In: Graf G, Kapferer E, Sedmak C, editors. Der Capability Approach und seine Anwendung – Fähigkeiten von Kindern und Jugendlichen erkennen und fördern. [Abilities and opportunities – starting point for promoting children’s health, growth, and development. Incentives from occupational therapy for children, adolescents, and their proxies, referring to Amartya Sens’s Capability Approach]. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2013. p. 245–270.
   Google Scholar
• Palisano R, Chiarello L, King G, et al. Participation-based therapy for children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:1041–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna K, Rodger S. Towards family-centred practice in paediatric occupational therapy: a review of the literature on parent–therapist collaboration. Aust Occup Ther J. 2002;49:14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn E, Miller LJ, Tickle-Degnen L. Parental hopes for therapy outcomes: children with sensory modulation disorders. Am J Occup Ther 2000;54:36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeglinsky I, Brogre Carlberg E, Autti-Rämo I. How are actual needs recognized in the content and goals of written rehabilitation plans? Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:441–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüther G. Lernen durch Erfahrung. Neurobiologische Erkenntnisse als Rückenstärkung für Wegbereiter einer neuen Schulkultur. [Learning through experience. Neurobiological insights for strengthening pioneers on the way to a new school culture]. Lernende Schule. 2009;12:46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Mende M. The special effects of hypnosis and hypnotherapy: a contribution to an ecological model of therapeutic change. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2006;54:167–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankl V. Man’s search for meaning. An introduction to logotherapy. Boston: Beacon; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan R, Long T. The effectiveness of occupational therapy for children with developmental disorder: a review of the qualitative literature. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75:10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Rezze B, Law M, Eva K, et al. Therapy behaviours in paediatric rehabilitation: essential attributes for intervention with children with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner EE. What can we learn about resilience from large-scale longitudinal studies? In: Goldstein S, Brooks RB editors. Handbook of resilience in children. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013, p. 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau KA, Bradley Cousins J. Making program evaluation activities family-centered: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:948–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, Levack WMM. Rehabilitation goal setting. theory, practice and evidence. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rodger S. Occupation centred practice with children: a practical guide for occupational therapists. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar