Brazilian Portuguese version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR-Br): cross-cultural validation, reliability, and construct and structural validation

References

• Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, et al. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthr Rheum. 1995;38:19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz LP. Worldwide epidemiology of fibromyalgia. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013;17:356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: a clinical review. JAMA 2014;311:1547–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghavidel-Parsa B, Bidari A, Amir Maafi A, et al. The iceberg nature of fibromyalgia burden: the clinical and economic aspects. Korean J Pain 2015;28:169–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr AJ, Thompson PW, Kirwan JR. Quality of life measures. Br J Rheumatol. 1996;36:275–281.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett RM, Friend R, Jones KD, et al. The Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): validation and psychometric properties. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009a;11:R120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burckhardt CS, Clark BD, Bennett RM. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J. Rheumatol. 1991;18:728–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques AP, Santos AMB, Assumpção A, et al. Validação da versão brasileira do Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). Rev Brasil Reumatol. 2006;46:24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Paiva ES, Heymann RE, Rezende MC, et al. A Brazilian Portuguese version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR): a validation study. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:1199–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments – COSMIN [Internet]. Amsterdam, Netherlands VU: University Medical Center; 2012 [Internet] [cited 2015 Sep 21]. Available from: http://www.cosmin.nl/images/upload/files/COSMIN%20checklist%20manual%20v9.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe F, Clauw D, Fitzcharles MA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthr Care Res. 2010;62:600–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf) 2005;27:281–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World health Organization (WHO). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments; 2016 [Internet] [cited 2016 Jun 14]. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakut Y, Yakut E, Bayar K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:1083–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Sothern RB, Campbell J. Aspects of diurnal rhythmicity in pain, stiffness, and fatigue in patients with fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:379–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zautra AJ, Fasman R, Parish BP, et al. Daily fatigue in women with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. Pain 2007;128:128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:400–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:82–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isomura T, Nakamura I, Kawaguchi M, et al. Psychometric assessment of the Japanese version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: reliability and validity. Int J Rheum Disord. 2015;4 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25939290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vet HC, Adèr HJ, Terwee CB, et al. Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1203–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. In: Kazdin AE, editor. Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 1998. p. 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong AG, Pearce SA. Beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutor Quant Meth Psychol. 2013;9:79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Meth Psychol Res. 2003;8:23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Dancey CP, Reidy J. Statistics without maths for psychology: using SPSS for Windows. New York: Prentice Hall; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, et al. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1990;17:1022–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaffi F, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, et al. Psychometric characteristics of the Italian version of the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire using classical test theory and Rasch analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31:S41–S49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ediz L, Hiz O, Toprak M, et al. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30:339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srifi N, Bahiri R, Rostom S, et al. The validity and reliability of the Moroccan version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgueiro M, García-Leiva JM, Ballesteros J, et al. Validation of a Spanish version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR). Health Qual Life Outc. 2013;11:132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Dahab S, AbuRuz SM, Mustafa K, et al. Validation of the Arabic version of the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR_A) on Jordanian females with fibromyalgia. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33:391–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo SR, Park DJ, Kang JH, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Revised Korean version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire: its association with physical function and quality of life. Int J Rheum Disord. 2015;27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesquisa Nacional por amostra de domicilio [internet]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ). Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE (Brazil); 2011. p. 1–135.
   Google Scholar
• de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink, et al. Measurement in medicine a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett RM, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, et al. Minimal clinically important difference in the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2009b;36:1304–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright A, Hannon J, Hegedus EJ, et al. Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). J Man Manip Ther. 2012;20:160–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar