75
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Cross cultural adaptations and psychometric domains of Brazilian version of PROFILE PD for Parkinson’s disease

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1759-1770 | Received 20 Sep 2015, Accepted 02 Jul 2016, Published online: 16 Aug 2016

References

  • Barbieri FA, Rinaldi NM, Santos PC, et al. Functional capacity of Brazilian patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD): relationship between clinical characteristics and disease severity. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;54:83–88.
  • PORTARIA SAS/MS n° 228 de 10 de maio de 2010. Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas: Doença de Parkinson (Republicada em 27.08.10). Available from: http://portal.saude.gov.br/portal/arquivos/pdf/pcdt_doenca_parkinson_livro_2010.pdf
  • Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008;23:2129–2170.
  • Shulman LM, Gruber-Baldini AL, Anderson KE, et al. The evolution of disability in Parkinson disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23:790–796.
  • Gallagher DA, Goetz CG, Stebbins G, et al. Validation of the MDS-UPDRS Part I for nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2012;27:79–83.
  • Custon TM, Sloane R, Schenkman M. Development of a clinical rating scale for persons with Parkinson's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47:763–764.
  • Schenkman M, McFann K, Barón A. Profile PD: profile of function and impairment level experience with Parkinson disease – clinimetric properties of a rating scale for physical therapist practice. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010;34:182–192.
  • Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
  • Bertolucci PHF, Brucki SMD, Campacci SR, et al. O mini-exame do estado mental em uma população geral: impacto da escolaridade. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994;52:1–7.
  • Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:812.
  • Schenkman ML, Clark K, Xie T, et al. Spinal movement and performance of a standing reach task in participants with and without Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2001;81:1400–1411.
  • Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Parkinson’s disease. The Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2003;18:738–750.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
  • Fleiss JL, Levin BA, Paik MC. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 3rd ed. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2003.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
  • Morris ME, Martin CL, Schenkman ML. Striding out with Parkinson disease: evidence-based physical therapy for gait disorders. Phys Ther. 2010;90:280–288.
  • Keus SHJ, Bloem BR, Hendriks EJM, et al. Evidence-based analysis of physical therapy in Parkinson's disease with recommendations for practice and research. Mov Disord. 2007;22:451–460.
  • Elbers RG, van Wegen EE, Verhoef J, et al. Reliability and structural validity of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:532–536.
  • Santos MP, Ovando AC, Silva BA, et al. Parkinson Activity Scale: cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the Brazilian version. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15:89–95.
  • Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–S189.
  • Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:735–743.
  • Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1693–1700.
  • Streiner DL, Norman GR. Measuring change, responsiveness and sensitivity to change. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, editors. Health measurement scales. 4th ed. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 277–288.
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and the use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.
  • Stratford PW, Riddle DL. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:23.
  • Nieuwboer A, De Weerdt W, Dom R, et al. Development of an activity scale for individuals with advanced Parkinson Disease: reliability and ‘on–off’ variability. Phys Ther. 2000;80:1087–1096.
  • Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland–Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther. 1996;76:359–365.
  • Gadotti IC, Vieira ER, Magee DJ. Importance and clarification of measurement properties in rehabilitation. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2006;10:137–146.
  • Eriksson B-M, Arne M, Ahlgren C. Keep moving to retain the healthy self: the meaning of physical exercise in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:237–244.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.