Experiences of adults with high-care needs and their family members with housing and support pathways in Australia

References

• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s welfare 2013. Australia’s welfare series no.11. Cat. no. AUS 174. Canberra: AIHW; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2009. Disability support services 2007–08: national data on services provided under the Commonwealth State/Territory Disability Agreement. Disability series. Cat. no. DIS 56. Canberra: AIHW Internet; [cited 2014 Nov 11] Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id =64424 55877.
   Google Scholar
• Beer A, Faulkner D. The housing careers of people with a disability and carers of people with a disability. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison M, Davis C. Housing, social policy and difference – Disability, ethnicity, gender and housing. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison M. Defining housing quality and environment: disability, standards and social factors. Hous Stud. 2004;19:691–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie R. Housing quality, disability and domesticity. Hous Stud. 2004;19:685–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie R. Disability, embodiment and the meaning of home. Hous Stud. 2004;19:745–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancino J, Williams J. Living in a community: An examination of the philosophic and practical aspects. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1994;9:35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds A, Inglis S, O’Brien A. Effective program linkages – an examination of current knowledge with particular emphasis on people with mental illness. Swinburne-Monash: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Farnworth L, Sloan S, et al. Moving from aged care facilities to community based accommodation: Outcomes and environmental factors. Brain Inj. 2010;25:153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Fyffe C. Position statement on housing and support for people with severe or profound intellectual disability. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009;34:96–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridge C, Kendig H, Quine S, et al. Housing and care for younger and older adults with disabilities. Final report no. 16, Sydney: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Younger people with disability in residential aged care: update from the 2009-10 Minimum Data Set. Bulletin no. 86. Cat. no. AUS 135. Canberra: AIHW; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Disability in Australia: Acquired brain injury, Bulletin no. 55, Cat no. AUS 96. Canberra: AIHW; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Community Affairs References Committee. (2005). Quality and equity in aged care, Canberra: The Senate; 2005. Available from: http://www.aph.gov.au/∼/media/wopapub/senate/committee/clac_ctte/completed_inquiries/2004_07/aged_care04/report/report_pdf.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• National People with a Disability and Carers Council. National disability strategy consultation report – ‘Shut Out: the experience of people with disabilities in Australia and their families’. Canberra: National People with a Disability and Carers Council; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bleasdale M. Supporting the housing of people with complex needs, Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4430.0 – Disability, Ageing and Carers, Australia: Summary of Findings, 2012. Canberra: ABS; 2012. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/4430.0Chapter2002012.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards B, Higgins DJ, Gray M, et al. The nature and impact of caring for a family member with a disability in Australia. Canberra: The Australian Institute of Family Studies; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Howse D, Patel J. Young adults with traumatic brain injury in long term homes: a population based study. Brain Impair. 2010;11:31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green G, Todd J. ‘Restricting choices and limiting independence’: social and economic impact of multiple sclerosis upon households by level of disability. Chronic Illness 2008;4:160–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kersten P, Low J, Ashburn S, et al. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:860–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopp L, Clark M, Hagglund K, et al. Life activities among individuals with spinal cord injury living in the community: perceived choice and perceived barriers. Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52:82–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiee P, Glendinning C. Choice: what, when and why? Exploring the importance of choice to disabled people. Disabil Soc. 2010;25:827–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Farnworth L, Sloan S, et al. Young people in aged care: progress of the current national program. Aust Health Rev. 2011;35:320–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battams S. Housing for people with psychiatric disability: community empowerment, partnerships and politics. Unpublished thesis. South Australia: Flinders University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Battams S, Baum F. What policies and policy processes are needed to ensure that people with psychiatric disabilities have access to appropriate housing? Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1026–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel I. Housing for people with intellectual disabilities and the National Disability Insurance Scheme Reforms. ResPract Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;2:45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grbich C. Qualitative data analysis – an introduction. London: Sage; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour R. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? Bmj. 2001;322:1115–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason M. [Internet] Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum – Qualitative Social Research Sept 2010;11, No. 3, Art 8. Internet; [cited 2014 Nov 13]. Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027.
   Google Scholar
• Green J, Willis K, Hughes E, et al. Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31:545–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton M. Qualitative research and evaluation method. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Housing assistance in Australia 2014. Cat. no. HOU 275. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Copley A, McAllister L, Wilson L. We finally learnt to demand: consumers’ access to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impair. 2013;14:436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellick D, Gerhart K, Whiteneck G. Understanding outcomes based on the post-acute hospitalization pathways followed by persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003;17:55–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron C, Pirozzo S, Tooth L. Long-term care of people below age 65 with severe acquired brain injury: appropriateness of aged care facilities. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25:261–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felce D. The determinants of staff and resident activity in residential services for people with severe intellectual disability: moving beyond size, building design, location and number of staff. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 1998;23:103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disability Investment Group. (2009). The way forward: a new disability policy framework for Australia. Canberra: Disability Investment Group; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Family Studies. The nature and impact of caring for family members with a disability in Australia. Research report no. 16. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Price-Waterhouse Coopers. Disability expectations– investing in a better stronger life; November 2011 Internet; [cited 2014 Nov 13]. Avaialble from: http://www.pwc.com.au/industry/government/assets/disability-in-australia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Foster M, Harris J, Jackson K, et al. Personalised social care for adults with disabilities: a problematic concept for frontline practice. Health Soc Care Community. 2006;14:125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins M. Disability care Australia making a difference. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan C, Garago J, Brandys, et al. Family caregivers' support needs after brain injury: a synthesis of perspectives from caregivers, programs, and researchers. Neurorehabilitation. 2010;27:5–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellon M, Crocker R, Farnden J, et al. Family support needs folloiwng acquired Brain Inj. acorss metropolitan and regional/remote South Australia. Brain Impair. 2015;16:131–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakenham K, Stebbins P, Cannon T, et al. Carers in contemporary Australia: relations among carer illness/disability Groups, biographics, caring context, coping and distress. Brisbane: PsyHealth Media; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning C. Increasing choice and control for older and disabled people: a critical review of new developments in England. Soc Policy Admin. 2008;42:451–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Farnworth L, Sloan S, et al. Getting out: mid-term evaluation of the younger people in residential aged care program. Melbourne: Summer Foundation Ltd; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Farnworth L, Sloan S. People under 60 living in aged care facilities in Victoria. Aust Health Rev. 2006;30:100–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster M, Henman P, Fleming J, et al. The politics of needs-based entitlement: Perspectives on a proposal for a national disability long-term care and support scheme in Australia. Soc Policy Soc. 2012;11:331–343.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth C, Gardner A. “We’re not asking for anything special”: direct payments and the carers of disabled children. Disabil Soc. 2007;22:235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. Disability care and support, Report no. 54. Canberra: Productivity Commission; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Henman P, Foster M. Models of disability support governance: a framework for assessing and reforming social policy [online]. Aust J Soc Issues. 2015;50:233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar