“I’ve never been a yes person”: Decision-making participation and self-conceptualization after severe traumatic brain injury

References

• Douglas J. Conceptualizing self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2013;27:60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T. Self-identity after brain injury. Hove (UK): Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Markus H, Wurf E. The dynamic self-concept: a social psychological perspective. Ann Rev Psychol. 1987;38:299–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garro LC. Chronic illness and the construction of narratives. In: Del Vecchio Good M, Brodwin PE, Good BJ, Kleinman A, editors. Pain as human experience: an anthropological perspective. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1992. p. 100–137.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp R. Personal responses to traumatic brain injury: a qualitative study. Disabil Soc. 1993;8:393–404.
   Google Scholar
• Nochi M. Reconstructing self-narratives in coping with traumatic brain injury. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1795–1804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumisko E, Lexell J, Söderberg S. The meaning of living with traumatic brain injury in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Nurs. 2005;37:42–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chamberlain DJ. The experience of surviving traumatic brain injury. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54:407–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Baguley IJ, Cameron ID. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Med J Aust. 2003;178:290–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, et al. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:341–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Selassie AW, Orman JAL. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25:72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor P. Hospitalization due to traumatic brain injury (TBI), Australia 1997–98. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Theadom A, Barker-Collo S, et al. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: a population-based study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:53–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinlay A, Grace RC, Horwood LJ, et al. Prevalence of traumatic brain injury among children, adolescents and young adults: prospective evidence from a birth cohort. Brain Injury. 2008;22:175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Langlois JA, et al. Prevalence of long-term disability from traumatic brain injury in the civilian population of the United States, 2005. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23:394–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Downing M, Olver J, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at 2, 5, and 10-years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:64–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale TW, Engberg AW. Subjective well-being and quality of life following traumatic brain injury in adults: a long-term population-based follow-up. Brain Injury. 2005;19:1041–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Harris RD, Cameron ID, et al. Recovery of impairments after severe traumatic brain injury: findings from a prospective, multicentre study. Brain Impairment. 2006;7:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Salmond CH, Menon DK, Chatfield DA, et al. Deficits in decision-making in head injury survivors. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh L, Wood RL. Using a temporal discounting paradigm to measure decision-making and impulsivity following traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Injury. 2008;22:715–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows LK. Current concepts in decision-making research from bench to bedside. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18:937–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara A, Van Der Linden M. Decision-making and impulse control after frontal lobe injuries. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18:734–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows LK. Damaged self, damaged control: a component process analysis of the effects of frontal lobe damage on human decision making. In: Hassin RR, Ochsner KN, Trope Y, editors. Self control in society, mind, and brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone K, Levin H, Malec J, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for executive function: moving from bench to bedside in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18:1212–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart T, Evans J. Self‐regulation and goal theories in brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:142–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans J. Positive psychology and brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Impairment. 2011;12:117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuscak SJ, Peisah C, Ferguson A. A collaborative approach to supporting communication in the assessment of decision-making capacity. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1107–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Drummond M, Knox L, et al. Rethinking social-relational perspectives in rehabilitation: traumatic brain injury as a case study. In: McPherson K, Gibson BE, Leplege A, editors. Rethinking rehabilitation: theory and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2015. p. 137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson JC. Who shall decide? The relevance of theory and research to decision-making by people with an intellectual disability. Disabil Handicap Soc. 1993;8:361–375.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan RM. The nature of the self in autonomy and relatedness. In: Strauss J, Goethals GR, editors. The self: interdisciplinary approaches. New York (NY): Springer; 1991. p. 208–238.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McCluskey A, Johnson M, Tate RL. The process of care management following brain injury: a grounded theory study. Brain Impairment. 2007;8:293–311.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Callaway L, Sloan S, et al. Everyday choice making: outcomes of young people with acquired brain injury after moving from residential aged care to community-based supported accommodation. Brain Impairment. 2015;16:221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas J, Bigby C. ‘The biggest thing is trying to live for two people’: spousal experiences of supporting decision-making participation for partners with TBI. Brain Injury. 2015;29:745–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ells C. Lessons about autonomy from the experience of disability. Soc Theor Pract. 2001;27:599–615.
   Google Scholar
• Beadle EJ, Ownsworth T, Fleming J, et al. The impact of traumatic brain injury on self-identity: a systematic review of the evidence for self-concept changes. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31:E12–E25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Haslam C. Impact of rehabilitation on self-concept following traumatic brain injury: an exploratory systematic review of intervention methodology and efficacy. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;26:1–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muenchberger H, Kendall E, Neal R. Identity transition following traumatic brain injury: a dynamic process of contraction, expansion and tentative balance. Brain Injury. 2008;22:979–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracey F, Palmer S, Rous B, et al. “Feeling part of things”: personal construction of self after brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18:627–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi M. Dealing with the 'void': traumatic brain injury as a story. Disabil Soc. 1997;12:533–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi M. “Loss of self” in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: a qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:869–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas EJ, Levack WMM, Taylor WJ. Self-reflective meaning making in troubled times change in self-identity after traumatic brain injury. Qual Health Res. 2014;24:1033–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurius P. Possible selves and social support: social cognitive resources for coping and striving. In: Howard JA, Callero PL, editors. The self-society dynamic: cognition, emotion, and action. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1991. p. 239–258.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts BW, Donahue EM. One personality, multiple selves: integrating personality and social roles. J Personality. 1994;62:199–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris S, Morley S, Barton SB. Role loss and emotional adjustment in chronic pain. Pain. 2003;105:363–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg T. Adults with acquired traumatic brain injury: experiences of a changeover process and consequences in everyday life. Soc Work Health Care. 2009;48:276–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair KPS. Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:192–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus H, Nurius P. Possible selves. Am Psychologist. 1986;41:954–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Azulay J. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22:257–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyerman A, Humphrey M. Changes in self-concept following severe head injury. Int J Rehabil Res. 1984;7:11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WMM, Kayes NM, Fadyl JK. Experience of recovery and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:986–999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. The self as habit: the reconstruction of self in chronic illness. OTJR: Occup Participation Health. 2002;22:31S–41S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelech JM, Desjardins M. I am many: the reconstruction of self following acquired brain injury. Qual Health Res. 2011;21:62–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman A, Adams M, Ashworth F. An exploration of the experience of self in the social world for men following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25:189–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson S, Delamere FM, Hutchinson SL. A personal narrative of involvement in post-traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: what can we learn for therapeutic recreation practice? Ther Recreat J. 2008;42:236–250.
   Google Scholar
• Doering BK, Conrad N, Rief W, et al. Living with acquired brain injury: self-concept as a mediating variable in the adjustment process. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;21:42–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. 1st ed. London (UK): Sage Publications; 1994. p. 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne (NY): Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory as an emergent method. In: Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P, editors. Handbook of emergent methods. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008. p. 155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London (UK): Sage Publications; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Mills J, Bonner A, Francis K. The development of constructivist grounded theory. Int J Qual Res Methods. 2006;5:25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructionism and the grounded theory method. In: Holstein JA, Gubrium JF, editors. Handbook of constructionist research. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2007. p. 397–412.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt TA. The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall J. Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. Western J Nurs Res. 1999;21:743–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draucker CB, Martsolf DS, Ross R, et al. Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1137–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LEL, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 9) 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tweed A, Charmaz K. Grounded theory methods for mental health practitioners. In: Harper D, Thompson AR, editors. Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: a guide for students and practitioners. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2012. p. 131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. London (UK): Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. A call for qualitative power analyzes. Qual Quant. 2007;41:105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glen KB. Supported decision-making and the human right of legal capacity. Inclusion. 2015;3:2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Brown I, Brown RI. Choice as an aspect of quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities. J Policy Pract Intell Disabil. 2009;6:11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nota L, Ferrari L, Soresi S, et al. Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. J Intell Disabil Res. 2007;51:850–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains. Can Psychol. 2008;49:14–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloute K, Mitchell A, Yates P. Traumatic brain injury and the construction of identity: a discursive approach. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18:651–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraas MR, Calvert M. The use of narratives to identify characteristics leading to a productive life following acquired brain injury. Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2009;18:315–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reindal SM. Independence, dependence, interdependence: some reflections on the subject and personal autonomy. Disabil Soc. 1999;14:353–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper K, Widdershoven GAM, Abma TA. Citizenship and autonomy in acquired brain injury. Nurs Ethics. 2011;18:526–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, Jong BAD, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24: 970–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt MR, Ells C. Partners towards autonomy: risky choices and relational autonomy in rehabilitation care. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:961–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WMM, Boland P, Taylor WJ, et al. Establishing a person-centred framework of self-identity after traumatic brain injury: a grounded theory study to inform measure development. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracey F, Ownsworth T. The experience of self in the world: the personal and social contexts of identity change after brain injury. In: Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam AS, editors. The social cure: identity, health and well-being. London (UK): Taylor and Francis; 2012. p. 273–296.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reconstruction of identity after brain injury. Brain Impairment. 2000;1:12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell JD. Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. J Personality Soc Psychol. 1990;59:538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey (CA): Brooks/Cole; 1979. p. 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Haslam SA, Reicher SD, Levine M. When other people are heaven, when other people are hell: how social identity determines the nature and impact of social support. In: Jetten J, Haslam C, Haslam AS, editors. The social cure: identity, health and well-being. London (UK): Taylor and Francis; 2012. p. 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Clapton J, Kendall E. Autonomy and participation in rehabilitation: time for a new paradigm? Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:987–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Muenchberger H, Clapton J. Trends in Australian rehabilitation: reviving its humanitarian core. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:817–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J. Respect for autonomy: issues in neurological rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas J, Bigby C. Whose decision is it anyway? How clinicians support decision-making participation after acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35: 1926–1932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Clapton J. Time for a shift in Australian rehabilitation? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1097–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, McNeil JE, Greenwood R. Rehabilitation outcomes after brain injury: disability measures or goal achievement? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:398–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas J. Placing therapy in the context of the self and social connection. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2015;17:199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R, Levack WMM, Sinnott KA. Life goals and social identity in people with severe acquired brain injury: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1234–1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado AN. Friends: connecting people with disabilities and community members. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, Research and Training Center on Community Living; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas J, Bigby C. “I won't be around forever”: understanding the decision-making experiences of adults with severe TBI and their parents. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;26:236–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooding P. Psychiatrists’ perceptions of supported decision-making: a Victorian empirical study. Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2015;22:701–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Whiteside M, Douglas J. Supporting people with cognitive disabilities in decision making: processes and dilemmas. Melbourne (VIC): Living with Disability Research Center, La Trobe University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, et al. The effectiveness of social communication partner training for adults with severe chronic TBI and their families using a measure of perceived communication ability. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;38:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi M. Struggling with the labeled self: people with traumatic brain injury in social setting. Qual Health Res. 1998;8:665–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar