References
- World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
- Baum CM. Fulfilling the promise: supporting participation in daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:169–175.
- Kersten P, Low JT, Ashburn A, et al. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:860–866.
- Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36:e100–e143.
- Wood JP, Connelly DM, Maly MR. ‘Getting back to real living’: a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:1045–1056.
- Barclay L, McDonald R, Lentin P. Social and community participation following spinal cord injury: a critical review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38:1–19.
- Bostan C, Oberhauser C, Stucki G, et al. Which environmental factors are associated with performance when controlling for capacity? J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:806–813.
- Smith EM, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. A review of factors influencing participation in social and community activities for wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;11:361–74.
- Wagner AK, Hammond FM, Sasser HC, et al. Return to productive activity after traumatic brain injury: relationship with measures of disability, handicap, and community integration. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:107–114.
- Walsh ME, Galvin R, Loughnane C, et al. Factors associated with community reintegration in the first year after stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1599–1608.
- Silver J, Ljungberg I, Libin A, et al. Barriers for individuals with spinal cord injury returning to the community: a preliminary classification. Disabil Health J. 2012;5:190–196.
- van de Velde D, Bracke P, van Hove G, et al. Perceived participation, experiences from persons with spinal cord injury in their transition period from hospital to home. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010;33:346–355.
- Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:578–588.
- Zhang L, Yan T, You L, et al. Barriers to activity and participation for stroke survivors in rural China. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1222–1228.
- McLafferty I. Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48:187–194.
- Bender DE, Ewbank D. The focus group as a tool for health research: issues in design and analysis. Health Transit Rev. 1994;4:63–80.
- Happell B. Focus groups in nursing research: an appropriate method or the latest fad? Nurse Res. 2007;14:18–24.
- Webb C, Kevern J. Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33:798–805.
- Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2002.
- Chang F-H, Coster WJ. Conceptualizing the construct of participation in adults with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1791–1798.
- Laidlaw K, Wang D, Coelho C, et al. Attitudes to ageing and expectations for filial piety across Chinese and British cultures: a pilot exploratory evaluation. Aging Ment Health. 2010;14:283–292.
- Daniel K, Wolfe CDA, Busch MA, et al. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009;40:e431–e440.
- Daruwalla P, Darcy S. Personal and societal attitudes to disability. Ann Tour Res. 2005;32:549–570.
- Keller C, Siegrist M. Psychological resources and attitudes toward people with physical disabilities. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2010;40:389–401.
- Charles ED, Gloria LK, Jana JP, et al. Chapter 8. Health of people with disabilities: determinants and disparities. Washington, DC: Disability and Public Health. American Public Health Association; 2009.